Warrants of ICC are binding, Borrell says

High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Josep Borrell speaks during a conference in Nicosia, Cyprus November 23, 2024. (REUTERS)
High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Josep Borrell speaks during a conference in Nicosia, Cyprus November 23, 2024. (REUTERS)
Short Url
Updated 23 November 2024
Follow

Warrants of ICC are binding, Borrell says

Warrants of ICC are binding, Borrell says
  • I have the right to criticize the decisions of the Israeli government without being accused of antisemitism

NICOSIA: EU governments cannot pick and choose whether to execute arrest warrants issued by the International Criminal Court against two Israeli leaders and a Hamas commander, the EU’s foreign policy chief said on Saturday.

The ICC issued the warrants on Thursday against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, his former defense minister Yoav Gallant, and Hamas leader Ibrahim Al-Masri for alleged crimes against humanity.
All EU member states signed the ICC’s founding treaty, the Rome Statute.
Several EU states have said they will meet their commitments under the statute if needed, but Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban has invited Netanyahu to visit his country, assuring him he would face no risks if he did so.
“The states that signed the Rome convention must implement the court’s decision. It’s not optional,” Josep Borrell, the EU’s top diplomat, said during a visit to Cyprus for a workshop of Israeli and Palestinian peace activists.
Those same obligations were also binding on countries aspiring to join the EU, he said.
“It would be very funny that the newcomers have an obligation that current members don’t fulfill,” he said.
The US rejected the ICC’s decision and Israel said the ICC move was antisemitic.
“Every time someone disagrees with the policy of one Israeli government — (they are) being accused of antisemitism,” said Borrell, whose term as EU foreign policy chief ends this month.
“I have the right to criticize the decisions of the Israeli government, be it Mr. Netanyahu or someone else, without being accused of antisemitism. This is not acceptable. That’s enough.”
In their decision, the ICC judges said there were reasonable grounds to believe Netanyahu and Gallant were criminally responsible for acts including murder, persecution, and starvation as a weapon of war as part of a “widespread and systematic attack against the civilian population of Gaza.”
The warrant for Al-Masri lists charges of mass killings during the Oct. 7, 2023, attacks. Israel says it has killed Al-Masri.
Turkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has praised the “courageous decision” of the International Criminal Court to seek the arrest of Netanyahu and Gallant.
“We support the arrest warrant. We consider it important that this courageous decision be carried out by all country members of the accord to renew the trust of humanity in the international system,” Erdogan said in a speech in Istanbul.
“It is imperative that Western countries — who for years have given the world lessons on law, justice, and human rights — keep their promises at this stage,” added Erdogan, whose country is not a state party in the ICC accord.
Erdogan has become a fierce critic of Israel since the start of its military offensive on Gaza in October 2023.
He has vowed several times to make sure that Israel’s prime minister is “brought to account” over the Israeli military campaign in the Palestinian territory.
Turkiye and 52 other countries this month sent a letter to the UN demanding an end to arms sales and deliveries to Israel.

 


Rubio headed to Paris for Ukraine war talks

Updated 2 sec ago
Follow

Rubio headed to Paris for Ukraine war talks

Rubio headed to Paris for Ukraine war talks
Rubio is traveling with US envoy Steve Witkoff for talks with European officials
Trump’s push for a ceasefire in the war has yet to yield fruit

WASHINGTON: US Secretary of State Marco Rubio is headed Wednesday to Paris for talks on ending the war in Ukraine, his office said.
The State Department said in a communique that Rubio is traveling with US envoy Steve Witkoff for talks with European officials on advancing President Donald Trump’s goal of ending the war triggered by the Russian invasion of its pro-Western neighbor in 2022.
Trump’s push for a ceasefire in the war has yet to yield fruit, and a Russian missile strike Sunday in the Ukrainian city of Sumy that killed at least 35 people showed how the war is far from over, even as peace overtures are under way.
Witkoff said Monday, three days after holding his third meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin, that he himself sees a peace deal “emerging.”
The Paris talks also come as rare discussions between the United States and Iran on Tehran’s nuclear program were held Saturday in Oman. Another round is scheduled for April 19, also in Oman.

EU lists seven ‘safe’ countries of origin, tightening asylum rules

EU lists seven ‘safe’ countries of origin, tightening asylum rules
Updated 7 min ago
Follow

EU lists seven ‘safe’ countries of origin, tightening asylum rules

EU lists seven ‘safe’ countries of origin, tightening asylum rules
  • The European Commission said it was proposing to designate Egypt, Morocco, Tunisia, Kosovo, Bangladesh, Colombia, and India as “safe countries of origin“
  • Brussels has been under pressure to clamp down on irregular arrivals and facilitate deportations

BRUSSELS: The European Union on Wednesday published a list of seven countries it considers “safe,” in a bid to speed up migrant returns by making it harder for citizens of those nations to claim asylum in the bloc.
The European Commission said it was proposing to designate Egypt, Morocco, Tunisia, Kosovo, Bangladesh, Colombia, and India as “safe countries of origin.”
The move, criticized by rights groups, is set to allow EU governments to process asylum applications filed from citizens of those countries more quickly — by introducing a presumption that such claims lack merit.
“Many member states are facing a significant backlog of asylum applications, so anything we can do now to support faster asylum decisions is essential,” said Magnus Brunner, the EU’s commissioner for migration.
Brussels has been under pressure to clamp down on irregular arrivals and facilitate deportations, following a souring of public opinion on migration that has fueled hard-right electoral gains in several countries.
On Wednesday, the commission said EU candidate nations would also in principle meet the criteria to be designated as safe countries.
But it also laid out exceptions, including when they are hit by a conflict — something that would for example exclude Ukraine.
The EU had already presented a similar list in 2015 but the plan was abandoned due to heated debates over whether or not to include Turkiye, another candidate for membership.
The list published Wednesday can be expanded or reviewed over time and was drawn up looking at nations from which a significant number of applicants currently come, the commission said.
Several member states already designate countries they deem “safe” with regard to asylum — France’s list for instance includes Mongolia, Serbia and Cape Verde.
The EU effort aims to harmonize rules and ensure that all members have the same baseline.
States can individually add countries to the EU list, but not subtract from it.
Asylum cases will still have to be examined individually, ensuring that existing safeguards remain in place and asylum-seekers are not rejected outright, the commission added.
The plan has to be approved by the European Parliament and member states before it can enter into force.
But it has already come under fire by human rights groups.
EuroMed Rights, an umbrella group, said some of the countries featured in the EU list suffered from “documented rights abuses and limited protections for both their own citizens and migrants.”
“Labelling them ‘safe’ is misleading — & dangerous,” it wrote on X.
Irregular border crossings detected into the European Union were down 38 percent to 239,000 last year after an almost 10-year peak in 2023, according to EU border agency Frontex.
But led by hawks including Italy, Denmark and the Netherlands, EU leaders called in October for urgent new legislation to increase and speed up returns and for the commission to assess “innovative” ways to counter irregular migration.
Currently less than 20 percent of people ordered to leave the bloc are returned to their country of origin, according to EU data.
Last month the commission unveiled a planned reform of the 27-nation bloc’s return system, which opened the way for member states to set up migrant return centers outside the EU.
Italy’s interior minister Matteo Piantedosi Wednesday hailed the EU’s latest move as “a success for the Italian government.”


France urges release of jailed Russian journalists who covered Navalny

France urges release of jailed Russian journalists who covered Navalny
Updated 12 min 38 sec ago
Follow

France urges release of jailed Russian journalists who covered Navalny

France urges release of jailed Russian journalists who covered Navalny
  • A judge sentenced the reporters – Antonina Kravtsova, Konstantin Gabov, Sergei Karelin, and Artem Kriger – who all covered late opposition leader Alexei Navalny time in jail

PARIS: France on Wednesday urged Russia to immediately release four journalists sentenced to long prison terms for their association with the late opposition leader Alexei Navalny.
Navalny – Putin’s main opponent – was declared an “extremist” by Russian authorities, a ruling that remains in force despite his death in an Arctic penal colony on February 16, 2024.
Moscow also banned Navalny’s organizations as “extremist” shortly before launching its 2022 Ukraine offensive and has ruthlessly targeted those it deems to have links to him.
“France condemns the five-and-a-half-year prison sentences handed down yesterday,” French foreign ministry spokesman Christophe Lemoine said.
A judge sentenced the reporters – Antonina Kravtsova, Konstantin Gabov, Sergei Karelin, and Artem Kriger – who all covered Navalny to “five years and six months in a general-regime penal colony,” an AFP journalist heard.
“The ‘trial of the journalists’ is a new demonstration by the Russian authorities to repress any dissenting opinion and intimidate those who attempt to document the human rights violations for which the Russian government is responsible,” he said.
“France is calling for the immediate and unconditional release of all those prosecuted for political reasons and for Russia to respect its international commitments regarding the right to information and access to information,” Lemoine added.
Kravtsova, 35, is a journalist who worked for the independent SOTAvision outlet.
Gabov, 38, collaborated with Reuters and other foreign outlets, while 42-year-old Karelin, who is also an Israeli citizen, with the Associated Press and Deutsche Welle.
Kriger, 24, the youngest among the accused, covered political trials and protests for SOTAvision.


EU approves sale of new Alzheimer’s drug, with conditions

EU approves sale of new Alzheimer’s drug, with conditions
Updated 42 min 48 sec ago
Follow

EU approves sale of new Alzheimer’s drug, with conditions

EU approves sale of new Alzheimer’s drug, with conditions
  • Leqembi is the brand name of an active substance called lecanemab
  • The EMA “concluded that the benefits of this medicine outweighed the risks”

BRUSSELS: The European Commission said Wednesday that it had given formal approval for Leqembi, a long-awaited new treatment for early-stage Alzheimer’s disease, to be sold in the EU under strict conditions.
The authorization was granted Tuesday based on a favorable decision by Europe’s medicines watchdog, which after initial misgivings endorsed the treatment last November for a set category of patients.
Leqembi, developed by US multinational Biogen and Japanese-based Eisai, is the brand name of an active substance called lecanemab that is used to treat adults with mild memory and cognitive problems resulting from the early stages of the common type of dementia.
The first such medicine to be allowed in the EU, the drug was approved in line with the “positive scientific assessment of the European Medicines Agency,” the commission said in a statement.
The EMA “concluded that the benefits of this medicine outweighed the risks, in a particular population of patients with such disease and as long as risk minimization measures are applied,” the commission said.
“Therefore, the authorization decision also sets strict conditions on the use of Leqembi, as well as clear risk mitigation requirements,” it said.
The EMA endorsed the drug only for patients with a lower risk of potential brain bleeding: those who have “only one copy or no copy of ApoE4,” a type of gene known as an important risk factor for Alzheimer’s.
Lecanemab has been hailed by Alzheimer’s researchers and charities for being the first approved treatment that tackles the early stages of the disease, rather than managing the symptoms.
It works by using antibodies that bind to and clear the proteins that normally build up in the brains of people with Alzheimer’s, the most common type of dementia.
The treatment has been shown to decrease cognitive decline by a quarter in people in the early stages of the disease.
Leqembi, together with another Alzheimer’s drug called Aduhelm, received approval from the US Food and Drug Administration in 2023.


WHO countries strike landmark agreement on tackling future pandemics

WHO countries strike landmark agreement on tackling future pandemics
Updated 45 min 9 sec ago
Follow

WHO countries strike landmark agreement on tackling future pandemics

WHO countries strike landmark agreement on tackling future pandemics
  • Negotiators stumbled over the agreement’s Article 11, which deals with transferring technology for pandemic health products toward developing nations

GENEVA: Years of negotiations culminated early Wednesday with countries agreeing the text of a landmark accord on how to tackle future pandemics, aimed at avoiding the mistakes made during the Covid-19 crisis.
After more than three years of talks and one last marathon session, weary delegates at the World Health Organization’s headquarters finally sealed the deal at around 2:00 am (0000 GMT) Wednesday.
“Tonight marks a significant milestone in our shared journey toward a safer world,” said WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.
Five years after the emergence of Covid-19, which killed millions of people, devastated economies and upturned health systems, a sense of urgency hung over the talks, with new threats lurking — including H5N1 bird flu, measles, mpox and Ebola.
The final stretch of the talks also took place under the shadow of cuts to US foreign aid spending and threatened tariffs on pharmaceuticals.

Right until the last minute, disagreement lingered over a few thorny issues.
Negotiators stumbled over the agreement’s Article 11, which deals with transferring technology for pandemic health products toward developing nations.
During the Covid-19 pandemic, poorer states accused rich nations of hoarding vaccines and tests.
Countries with large pharmaceutical industries have strenuously opposed the idea of mandatory tech transfers, insisting they must be voluntary.
But it appeared the obstacle could be overcome by adding that any transfer needed to be “mutually agreed.”
The core of the agreement is a proposed Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing System (PABS), aimed at allowing the swift sharing of pathogen data with pharmaceutical companies, enabling them to quickly start working on pandemic-fighting products.
In the end, the 32-page agreement was entirely highlighted in green, indicating all of it had been fully approved by WHO member states.
“It’s adopted,” negotiations co-chair Anne-Claire Amprou announced, to thunderous applause.
“In drafting this historic agreement, the countries of the world have demonstrated their shared commitment to preventing and protecting everyone, everywhere, from future pandemic threats.”
The finalized text will now be presented for sign-off at the WHO’s annual assembly next month.

Congratulations quickly poured in.
“Excellent news from Geneva,” European Union chief Ursula von der Leyen said on X.
“We have learnt the lessons of COVID. To beat a pandemic, you need tests, treatments and vaccines. And you equally need solidarity and global cooperation.”
The EU had led the charge arguing for flexibility and voluntary measures in the text.
The International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and Associations (IFPMA), which participated in the talks, had also taken that stance.
Looking ahead toward implementation, the leading pharma lobby said intellectual property and legal certainty would be essential for encouraging investment in high-risk research and development in the next crisis.
“The pandemic agreement is a starting point,” insisted IFPMA chief David Reddy.
Developing countries and NGOs also hailed the agreement, while acknowledging that not all of their ambitions were met.
“While the process may not have yielded all the outcomes we aspired for, it has opened an important avenue for future collaboration,” Tanzania’s representative told the gathering, speaking on behalf of dozens of African countries.

As intense talks in corridors and closed rooms drew toward an end late Tuesday, Tedros told reporters he thought a deal would bring “more equity.”
While taking measures against pandemics could be costly, “the cost of inaction is much bigger,” he insisted.
“Virus is the worst enemy. (It) could be worse than a war.”
The United States, which has thrown the global health system into crisis by slashing foreign aid spending, was absent.
US President Donald Trump ordered a withdrawal from the United Nations’ health agency and from the pandemic agreement talks after taking office in January.
The US absence, and Trump’s threat to slap steep tariffs on pharmaceutical products, still hung over the talks, making manufacturers and governments more jittery.
But in the end, countries reached consensus.

Many saw the approval of the text as a victory for global cooperation.
“At a time when multilateralism is under threat, WHO member states have joined together to say that we will defeat the next pandemic threat in the only way possible: by working together,” said New Zealand’s former prime minister Helen Clark, co-chair of the Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response.
As the congratulatory speeches continued on toward daybreak, Eswatini’s representative cautioned that “whilst we celebrate this moment, we need not rest on our laurels.”
“The real work begins now.”