Portrait of Boutros Boutros-Ghali in his Cairo office a few days before becoming the sixth UN General Secretary. Getty Images
Portrait of Boutros Boutros-Ghali in his Cairo office a few days before becoming the sixth UN General Secretary. Getty Images

1991 - When Boutros Boutros-Ghali became UN secretary-general

Short Url
Updated 19 April 2025
Follow

1991 - When Boutros Boutros-Ghali became UN secretary-general

1991 - When Boutros Boutros-Ghali became UN secretary-general
  • The Egyptian diplomat, who served from 1992 to 1996, remains the only Arab to have assumed the role

CAIRO: Perhaps no Egyptian diplomat of the second half of the 20th century enjoyed the fame and international status of Boutros Boutros-Ghali. He remains the only Arab to have assumed the role of secretary-general of the UN, his term lasting from 1992 until 1996. 

To this day in Egypt, the name of Boutros-Ghali often resonates when discussing the crises the country is now facing, especially regarding the issue of the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam. The people of the country, including the simplest of them, know very well that he was the Egyptian official most closely tied to Africa’s diplomacy in the nation’s history. Even his nomination for the office of secretary-general of the UN was primarily supported by a number of African countries. 

Boutros-Ghali is one of the most prominent political figures in the history of modern Egypt. His fame went from local to global. The UN faced major worldwide challenges during his term as secretary-general, which coincided with radical transformations around the world including the collapse of the Soviet Union, the end of the Cold War, and the start of the unipolar era and US hegemony. This period also included the repercussions of the Gulf War, the break-up of Yugoslavia and the Rwandan genocide. 

During his time heading the UN, Boutros-Ghali successfully developed the working mechanisms of the organization and the means for it to intervene in conflicts to mitigate them and resolve disputes through peaceful means. He developed a concept for preventive diplomacy and peacemaking efforts, and for the attempted preservation of peace and support for it after a conflict ends. 

How we wrote it




Arab News covered Boutros Boutros Ghali’s acceptance speech as UN secretary-general where he was “expected to give priority” to the Arab-Israeli conflict.

Boutros-Ghali was born in Cairo on Nov. 14, 1922, to a Coptic family. His paternal grandfather, after whom he was named, was the prime minister of Egypt from 1908 until he was assassinated in 1910. His maternal grandfather, Mikhail Sharobim, was an important historian and author of “The Ample Guide to the Ancient and Modern History of Egypt.” 

Boutros-Ghali once said in an interview: “I was born in a family linked to government bodies from the beginning.” Most of his family was associated with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 

He first assumed the position of acting foreign minister in 1977, succeeding Ismail Fahmy, who resigned from the role following President Anwar Sadat’s peacemaking visit to Jerusalem. Boutros-Ghali was reinstated to the position in 1978-79 to succeed Mohammed Ibrahim Kamel, who disagreed with Sadat for similar reasons as Fahmy and quit on the eve of the signing of the Camp David Accords. 

Boutros-Ghali remained in the role under Hosni Mubarak’s rule and held several other positions, including deputy prime minister, minister of state for immigration, and deputy foreign minister for several months before he became secretary-general of the UN, in the face of strong opposition from the US. 

Despite his career with the Egyptian Foreign Ministry, he only assumed the role of minister of state for foreign affairs and was never named foreign minister. It is no secret to those close to him that the fact he was never given the title foreign minister made his heart heavy all his life, even though one of the nicknames given to him by Egyptians was “the father of popular diplomacy.” 

Boutros-Ghali was elected to the post of UN secretary-general in 1991 and faced great difficulties during his tenure. He wrote about these challenges in his book, “Five Years in a Glass House,” in which he revealed many hidden matters, including America’s role in the crises that swept the world during that time. 

His book also shed light on the souring of his relationship with Washington, describing the administration as being content with adopting loud external positions while pushing the UN into raging battles without providing it with real power or the necessary funds. 

Key Dates

  • 1

    Boutros Boutros-Ghali born in Cairo.

  • 2

    Accompanies Egyptian President Anwar Sadat on historic visit to Jerusalem.

    Timeline Image Nov. 19-21, 1977

  • 3

    Serves as Egypt’s minister of state for foreign affairs.

  • 4

    Attends Camp David Summit as negotiator of accords signed by Egypt and Israel.

    Timeline Image Sept. 5-17, 1978

  • 5

    Appointed secretary-general of the UN.

    Timeline Image Dec. 3, 1991

  • 6

    Begins five-year term as UN’s secretary-general.

  • 7

    The UN-mandated “Black Hawk Down” raid in Mogadishu, Somalia, leaves 19 US troops dead. Boutros-Ghali blamed by the US for the failure of the mission.

    Timeline Image Oct. 3-4, 1993

  • 8

    Denied a second term as secretary-general of the UN by a US veto.

  • 9

    Publishes memoir, “Unvanquished: A US-UN Saga,” in which he describes his 5-year battle with Washington and blames the “two-faced, arrogant” US for UN failures.

    Timeline Image 1999

  • 10

    Dies at the age of 93 in Cairo.

The decline of this relationship ultimately cost him his position with the UN. In 1996, 10 members of the Security Council, including Egypt, Guinea-Bissau and Botswana, tabled a resolution calling for Boutros-Ghali’s term to be extended for five more years. Fourteen of the 15 council members supported the resolution, but the US used its power of veto and suspended his candidacy, making him the first secretary-general to be denied a second term.

Boutros-Ghali said there were several reasons for Washington’s decision to veto his nomination for a second term, including political pressures related to the 1996 US presidential election, disagreements between America and the UN over issues such as the Bosnian War and the Rwandan genocide, and tensions over the outstanding dues owed by the US to the organization. 

After leaving the UN, he headed the Organization Internationale de la Francophonie as its first secretary-general. He also chaired Egypt’s National Council for Human Rights, before resigning in February 2011 following the events of Jan. 25 and the departure of Mubarak. 

When the Egyptian state decided to establish the National Council for Human Rights in 2003, it could not have found a more worthy and prominent Egyptian figure to head it. Boutros-Ghali had all the required qualities and continued to lead the council until 2011. He was reappointed in 2013 as its honorary president. 




UN Secretary General, Boutros Boutros Ghali addresses high-level open-ended working group on the UN’s financial situation in New York. Getty Images

Among his stances that are most memorable to Egyptians was the time when, following the popular uprising in 2013 that overthrew the Muslim Brotherhood, Boutros-Ghali wrote to Ban Ki-moon, the UN secretary-general at the time, saying: “What happened in Egypt on June 30, the day that saw protests demanding the removal of (President) Mohammed Morsi, was a full-fledged revolution, during which a fascist regime in a religious guise was eliminated.” 

Boutros-Ghali added in his message that the role of the UN, with all its mechanisms and components, was to “achieve international peace and security and cooperation between states,” and that what it does must seek to “fulfill its principles and charter to serve peace, security and justice, and fight terrorism.” 

He also wrote that “the people of Egypt revolted to eliminate a fascist regime that had a religious guise and worked to divide society in favor of one faction at the expense of all the other people,” and to “eliminate a regime that deepened discrimination.” 

Boutros-Ghali died on Feb. 16, 2016, at the age of 93 in a hospital in Cairo after a fight against illness. He was preparing to travel in a UN air ambulance to Paris to continue his treatment and undergo urgently required surgery. However, it was his fate to pass away in Cairo, connected to the city until his last breath, as if Egypt refused to let his soul leave its lands, out of loyalty to him and in appreciation for his time and effort. He had dedicated his life to Egypt from a young age. 

Egypt bade him farewell with a military funeral, during which prayers were led by Coptic Pope Tawadros II. The mourners in attendance included President Abdel Fattah El-Sisi and other state officials. Boutros-Ghali was buried at St. Peter and St. Paul’s Church in Cairo’s Abbassia district. 

  • Dr. Abdellatif El-Menawy, a columnist for Arab News, is a critically acclaimed multimedia journalist and writer who has covered war zones and conflicts worldwide. 


New militarized border zone spurs national security charges against hundreds of immigrants

New militarized border zone spurs national security charges against hundreds of immigrants
Updated 17 min 34 sec ago
Follow

New militarized border zone spurs national security charges against hundreds of immigrants

New militarized border zone spurs national security charges against hundreds of immigrants

SANTA FE, N.M.: Several hundred immigrants have been charged with unauthorized access to a newly designated militarized zone along the southern US border in New Mexico and western Texas since the Department of Justice introduced the new approach in late April.
President Donald Trump’s administration has transferred oversight of a strip of land along the US-Mexico border to the military while authorizing US troops to temporarily detain immigrants in the country illegally — though there’s no record of troops exercising that authority as US Customs and Border Protection conducts arrests. The designated national defense areas are overseen by US Army commands out of Fort Bliss in the El Paso area in Texas and Fort Huachuca in Arizona.
The novel national security charges against immigrants who enter through those militarized zones carry a potential sentence of 18 months in prison on top of a possible six month sentence for illegal entry. The full implications are unclear for migrants who pursue legal status through separate proceedings in federal immigration court.
The Trump administration is seeking to accelerate mass removals of immigrants in the country illegally and third-country deportations, including Venezuelans sent to an El Salvador prison amid accusations of gang affiliation. The administration has deployed thousands of troops to the border, while arrests have plunged to the lowest levels since the mid-1960s.
The federal public defender’s office in Las Cruces indicates that roughly 400 cases had been filed in criminal court there as of Tuesday as it seeks dismissal of the misdemeanor and petty misdemeanor charges for violating security regulations and entering restricted military property. Court records show that federal prosecutors in Texas — where a National Defense Area extends about 60 miles  from El Paso to Fort Hancock — last week began filing the military security charges as well.
Las Cruces-based federal Magistrate Judge Gregory Wormuth is asking for input from federal prosecutors and public defense attorneys on the standard of proof for the trespassing charges “given the unprecedented nature of prosecuting such offenses in this factual context.”
Public defenders say there needs to be proof that immigrants knew of the military restrictions and acted “in defiance of that regulation for some nefarious or bad purpose.”
New Mexico-based US Attorney Ryan Ellison, appointed in April, says hundreds of “restricted area” signs have been posted in Spanish and English to warn that entry is prohibited by the Department of Defense, along New Mexico’s nearly 180-mile  stretch of border.
In a court filings, Ellison has said there’s no danger of ensnaring innocent people when it comes to immigrants who avoid ports of entry to cross the border in willful violation of federal law — and now military regulations.
ACLU attorney Rebecca Sheff said basic freedoms are at risk as the government flexes its power at the border and restricts civilian access.
“The extension of military bases ... it’s a serious restriction, it’s a serious impact on families that live in the border area,” she said.
The Department of Justice has warned Wormuth against issuing an advisory opinion on legal standards for trespassing in the military area.
“The New Mexico National Defense Area is a crucial installation necessary to strengthen the authority of servicemembers to help secure our borders and safeguard the country,” Ellison said in a court briefing.
Democratic US Sen. Martin Heinrich of New Mexico expressed concern Wednesday in a letter to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth that anyone may be stopped and detained by US Army soldiers for entering a 170-square-mile  area along the border previously overseen by the Department of Interior and frequently used for recreation and livestock ranching.
Hegseth has emphasizing a hard-line approach to enforcement.
“Let me be clear: if you cross into the National Defense Area, you will be charged to the FULLEST extent of the law,” he said in a post on the social platform X.


Indian travel firms report drop in Turkey, Azerbaijan bookings over Pakistan support

Indian travel firms report drop in Turkey, Azerbaijan bookings over Pakistan support
Updated 17 min 54 sec ago
Follow

Indian travel firms report drop in Turkey, Azerbaijan bookings over Pakistan support

Indian travel firms report drop in Turkey, Azerbaijan bookings over Pakistan support
  • Both countries have remained popular destinations for Indians, but now bookings are down by 60%
  • Indians are also canceling planned trips to the two countries after they openly supported Pakistan

BENGALURU: Indians are cancelling holidays in popular resorts in Turkey and Azerbaijan after the countries supported Pakistan during its recent conflict with New Delhi, two booking firms said. Ties between India and Pakistan nosedived after a deadly attack in Indian-administered Kashmir last month that New Delhi said was backed by Islamabad.

Pakistan denied involvement, but intense fighting broke out when India struck what it said were "terrorist camps" in Pakistan last week.

They agreed a ceasefire on Saturday which has largely held.

Turkey and Azerbaijan, popular budget holiday destinations for Indians, issued statements backing Islamabad after India's strikes.

"Bookings for Azerbaijan and Turkey decreasing by 60% (over the last week) while cancellations have surged by 250% during the same period," a spokesperson for MakeMyTrip said.

EaseMyTrip's Chief Executive Officer, Rikant Pittie, said the platform had seen a 22% rise in cancellations for Turkey and 30% for Azerbaijan "due to recent geopolitical tensions.”

Travellers had switched to Georgia, Serbia, Greece, Thailand and Vietnam, he added.

Another ticketing platform, ixigo, earlier said in a post on X that it would be suspending flight and hotel bookings for Turkey, Azerbaijan and China.

EaseMyTrip's founder and chairman Nishant Pitti said in a post on X that 287,000 Indians visited Turkey last year and 243,000 visited Azerbaijan.

"When these nations openly support Pakistan, should we fuel their tourism and their economies?" Pitti said.


Families of victims in South Korea plane crash file complaint against 15 officials

Families of victims in South Korea plane crash file complaint against 15 officials
Updated 24 min 49 sec ago
Follow

Families of victims in South Korea plane crash file complaint against 15 officials

Families of victims in South Korea plane crash file complaint against 15 officials
  • Police suggested a complex incident like the Jeju Air crash would require a lengthy investigation but declined to say when they expect to wrap up their probe

SEOUL, South Korea: Families of victims of December’s devastating plane crash in South Korea have filed a complaint against 15 people including the transport minister and the airline chief who they believe are responsible for the disaster that killed all but two of the 181 people on board.
Police and government officials have already been investigating the Jeju Air crash, so the complaint is largely seen as a symbolic step calling for a swifter and more thorough probe. Many bereaved families complain of what they see as a lack of meaningful progress in efforts to determine what caused the disaster and who is responsible.
On Tuesday, 72 bereaved relatives submitted the complaint to the Jeonnam Provincial Police agency in southern South Korea, according to their lawyers and police.
The 15 people cited in the complaint include the transport minister, Jeju Air’s president and airline officials handling maintenance and safety issues, along with officials at Muan International Airport who are responsible for preventing bird strikes, air traffic control and facility management, according to a statement from a lawyers’ group supporting the relatives.
The statement said the crash was “not a simple accident but a grave public disaster caused by negligent management of risks that must be prevented.”
“Four months after the disaster, we can’t help feeling deep anger and despair over the fact that there has been little progress” in the investigation, Kim Da-hye, a bereaved family member, said in the statement.
Lawyer Lee So-Ah said Wednesday the complaint would formally require police to brief bereaved families of their investigation, though police have so far only voluntarily done so.
The Boeing 737-800 operated by Jeju Air skidded off the runaway at the Muan airport on Dec. 29 after its landing gear failed to deploy, slamming into a concrete structure and bursting into flames.
Authorities have since said they found traces of bird strike in the plane’s engines and that the plane’s two black boxes stopped recording about 4 minutes before the crash. Many analysts said the concrete structure, which housed a set of antennas called a localizer that guides aircraft during landings, should have been built with lighter materials that could break more easily upon impact.
But no exact cause of the crash has been announced and no one has been legally persecuted yet over the crash, the country’s deadliest aviation disaster since 1997.
Jeonnam Provincial Police agency officials said they’ve been investigating the accident. They suggested a complex incident like the Jeju Air crash would require a lengthy investigation but declined to say when they expect to wrap up their probe.


Pakistan and Kuwait review trade, investment cooperation during bilateral consultations 

Pakistan and Kuwait review trade, investment cooperation during bilateral consultations 
Updated 33 min 32 sec ago
Follow

Pakistan and Kuwait review trade, investment cooperation during bilateral consultations 

Pakistan and Kuwait review trade, investment cooperation during bilateral consultations 
  • Fourth round of Pakistan-Kuwait Bilateral Political Consultations held in Kuwait, says Islamabad 
  • Pakistan has increasingly eyed trade, investment to ensure consistent, sustainable economic growth 

ISLAMABAD: Pakistani and Kuwaiti officials reviewed their countries’ cooperation in trade, investment, human resource collaboration and other economic spheres, the Pakistani foreign ministry said on Wednesday, as the two sides held their bilateral political consultations. 

Pakistan and Kuwait held the fourth round of their Bilateral Political Consultations (BPC) in Kuwait on Wednesday. The Kuwaiti delegation was led by Sameeh Essa Johar Hayat, the Gulf country’s assistant foreign minister (Asia Affairs) while Additional Foreign Secretary (Middle East) Shehryar Akbar Khan led the Pakistani side. 

“The two sides reviewed the entire spectrum of bilateral relations including trade, investment, human resource collaboration, consular and people-to-people contacts with a view to further enhance bilateral cooperation,” the statement said on Wednesday. 

It added that the two delegations also exchanged views on regional and international issues, and reaffirmed their commitment to continued cooperation and consultation.

“While expressing satisfaction over the upward trajectory in bilateral relations and the momentum of high-level interactions and exchanges, both sides agreed to further deepen engagement in diverse areas of mutual interest,” the Pakistani foreign ministry said. 
It said that the next round of the BPC between the two sides will take place in Islamabad on mutually agreed dates.
Since narrowly escaping a default in 2023, Pakistan has eyed increasing foreign trade and investment with regional allies, especially Gulf countries. 
Islamabad formed the Special Investment Facilitation Council (SIFC), a hybrid civil-military government body, tasked with attracting international investment in key economic sectors such as tourism, agriculture, livestock, mines and minerals and others. 


Ukraine peace talks: What are Kyiv and Moscow’s positions?

Ukraine peace talks: What are Kyiv and Moscow’s positions?
Updated 40 min 25 sec ago
Follow

Ukraine peace talks: What are Kyiv and Moscow’s positions?

Ukraine peace talks: What are Kyiv and Moscow’s positions?

ISTANBUL: Delegations from Kyiv and Moscow are set to hold their first direct talks on the possibility of ending the war in Ukraine for more than three years.
Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelensky has announced he will travel to Turkiye, while Russia’s Vladimir Putin indicated he will not attend the talks.
Despite the flurry of diplomacy and US President Donald Trump’s call for a swift end to the fighting, Moscow and Kyiv’s demands appear to be far apart.
Russia has repeatedly demanded to keep the territory in southern and eastern Ukraine that it occupies and for Kyiv to cede even more land.
Moscow in 2022 annexed four Ukrainian regions — Donetsk, Lugansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson — despite not having full control over them.
Russia also annexed the Crimean peninsula from Ukraine in 2014 and has held it ever since.
President Vladimir Putin last year demanded Ukraine pull its forces out of parts of those regions that its army still controls as a prerequisite to any peace settlement.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has said recognition of Moscow’s ownership of these territories was “imperative” for any negotiations.
Kyiv has said it will never recognize its occupied territories, including Crimea, as Russian.
But Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has said Kyiv may be forced to try to secure their return through diplomatic means — effectively conceding that Russia could maintain control over some land in any peace deal.
Russia has also demanded that Ukraine be barred from joining the NATO military alliance and has repeatedly said it wants Zelensky removed from office.
Russia had intended to topple Zelensky when it launched its invasion in 2022, with Putin calling in a televised address for Ukraine’s generals to oust him in a coup d’etat and then open talks with Moscow.
Putin in March floated the idea of Ukraine being put under a UN-backed “temporary administration,” refreshing his call to essentially remove Zelensky.
Russian officials have throughout the war called for the “de-militarization” and “de-Nazification” of Ukraine — casting Kyiv as a neo-Nazi “regime.”
Kyiv, the West and independent experts have rejected those narratives.
Russia has also sought at times to limit the size of Ukraine’s army, wants Ukraine to be declared a neutral state and for Western countries to stop supplying it weapons.
Zelensky has for months been calling for “security guarantees” for Ukraine to stop Russia invading again.
His top demand would be for Ukraine to be admitted to NATO, or for Ukraine to fall under the military alliance’s Article Five collective defense term.
Trump has however, dismissed the possibility of Ukraine joining the bloc and Russia says NATO membership would be “unacceptable.”
Instead, Kyiv is pushing for some other form of Western military commitment that would deter Moscow.
Britain and France are leading discussions about a possible European troop deployment to enforce any ceasefire, among a group of countries dubbed the “coalition of the willing.”
But Zelensky and Kyiv still want Washington to back-up any “security guarantee.”
Moscow has said it would not accept troops from NATO countries being deployed to Ukraine in any capacity.
Zelensky wants an immediate, full and unconditional ceasefire to cover combat on air, sea and land.
He accepted a US proposal for that in March but Putin rejected it.
Putin has instead ordered two short “truces” — over Easter and to cover Russia’s May 9 Victory Day celebrations.
Air attacks dipped during the periods but Ukraine accused Moscow of violating both on hundreds of occasions.
In his late-night address from the Kremlin calling for the direct Russia-Ukraine talks, Putin said he did not “exclude” that some kind of ceasefire could be agreed between the sides.