Beijing says Philippines should not start conflict in South China Sea

Above, Chinese coast guard personnel onboard their vessel in the disputed South China Sea March 5, 2024. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 28 March 2025
Follow

Beijing says Philippines should not start conflict in South China Sea

  • Ministry spokesperson: Cooperation between the US and the Philippines should not target third parties

BEIJING: The Philippines should not start a conflict in the South China Sea with US support, China’s foreign ministry said on Friday.
Cooperation between the US and the Philippines should not target third parties, ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun told a regular press conference, when asked about US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s remarks on Friday saying that the two countries should strengthen deterrence against threats, including Chinese “aggression.”
“I would like to emphasize there has never been a problem with freedom of navigation and overflight in the South China Sea,” Guo said.


South Sudan at ‘critical tipping point’ as extreme hunger reaches its peak, World Food Program warns

Updated 49 min 58 sec ago
Follow

South Sudan at ‘critical tipping point’ as extreme hunger reaches its peak, World Food Program warns

  • The UN food agency says nearly 7.7m people, more than half the country’s population, are facing crisis, emergency or catastrophic levels of hunger
  • The nation is also grappling with a cholera outbreak as ongoing violence and mass displacement drive the spread of disease, and war in neighboring Sudan adds to the challenges

NEW YORK CITY: South Sudan is grappling with an unprecedented humanitarian crisis as escalating violence in the country, particularly in the conflict-ridden Greater Upper Nile region, exacerbates a dire situation of food insecurity, the UN’s food agency said on Wednesday.

The World Food Program warned that nearly 7.7 million people, more half of the country’s population, are currently facing crisis, emergency or catastrophic levels of hunger.

Mary-Ellen McGroarty, the WFP’s representative and country director for South Sudan, painted a grim picture of the deteriorating situation as she highlighted the compounded challenges the country faces as it enters its annual lean season, the time of year when hunger reaches its peak.

Tens of thousands of people have been displaced from their homes by the violence, political fragmentation and security instability, including more than 100,000 in the Upper Nile region alone.

“These are some of the most vulnerable and food-insecure areas of South Sudan, and the impact of conflict is only making matters worse,” McGroarty said.

More than 40 percent of the 7.7 million food-insecure people are concentrated in the Greater Upper Nile area, she added, where more than 60 percent of the population struggles to find a meal.

The worsening violence has also hindered humanitarian efforts, forcing the WFP to pause its operations in several regions. In total, more than 213,000 people in six counties are cut off from critical food aid. These areas, which lack roads or transportation infrastructure, rely on deliveries by river and air but active conflict means access is nearly impossible.

“The situation is catastrophic,” McGroarty said. “We’ve seen over 100 metric tons of food, including vital nutrition supplies for children, looted during recent clashes.

“These resources, which we cannot replace, were meant to feed children in a country where 17 percent of children are already malnourished.”

Beyond hunger, South Sudan is also grappling with a cholera outbreak that has compounded the public health crisis. The ongoing violence, coupled with mass displacement, is driving the spread of disease, further endangering the lives of vulnerable populations.

The war in neighboring Sudan adds an additional level of complexity. Since the conflict there began, more than 1.1 million refugees and South Sudanese returnees have fled across the border, many of them arriving with few or no possessions. McGroarty said that these individuals, who have endured harrowing journeys, add to the already immense pressure on resources and infrastructure in South Sudan.

“The economic toll of the Sudanese conflict is also being felt here,” she added. “Food prices in the border states have soared, with some rising by as much as 200 percent. Disrupted supply chains are forcing us to bring food from the south, significantly increasing costs.”

South Sudan’s vulnerability to climate change, manifested in both severe flooding and droughts, has further eroded the resilience of the country, leaving it ill-equipped to cope with escalating conflict.

“We are at a critical tipping point,” McGroarty warned. “The people of South Sudan, already trapped in the cycle of conflict and hunger, deserve freedom from these crises. They need our attention and support now more than ever.”

With humanitarian resources stretched thin and urgent needs continuing to rise, McGroarty told Arab News that the WFP needs $396 million in funding to enable it to reach 4.5 million people in need.

“That means, out of 7.7 million people, we will be leaving people behind,” she said.

Her organization needs to “preposition the food stocks as we approach the rainy season, so that communities that are food insecure have resources throughout (that) season,” she added.


Former Russian minister found guilty of breaching UK sanctions

Updated 09 April 2025
Follow

Former Russian minister found guilty of breaching UK sanctions

  • Dmitrii Ovsiannikov, 48, was found guilty of six counts of evading sanctions between February 2023 and January 2024
  • He became the first person to be convicted for breaching the United Kingdom’s Russia sanctions

LONDON: A former Russian minister and ally of President Vladimir Putin was found guilty of breaching sanctions along with his brother by a London court Wednesday, in the first such UK case.
Dmitrii Ovsiannikov, 48, was found guilty of six counts of evading sanctions between February 2023 and January 2024, becoming the first person to be convicted for breaching the United Kingdom’s Russia sanctions.
His brother Alexei Owsjanikow, 47, was convicted of two counts of breaching sanctions, while Dmitrii’s wife, Ekaterina Ovsiannikova, 47, was cleared of all charges by Southwark Crown Court.
The brothers are due to be sentenced at a later date.
The former minister breached restrictions imposed for his role in Russian-occupied Crimea by opening a UK bank account, receiving nearly £80,000 ($100,000) from his wife, and a car from his brother.
When the bank realized he was on the UK sanctions list, it froze the account.
Ovsiannikov was appointed by Putin as mayor of Crimea’s largest city, Sevastopol, two years after the peninsula’s annexation by Russia from Ukraine in 2014. He previously served as Russia’s deputy minister for industry and trade.
As a result, the European Union imposed financial sanctions on him in 2017, which the UK maintained after leaving the EU.
While the EU lifted its sanctions in February 2023, the UK ones still apply, banning him from traveling to and accessing funds in the country.
Ovsiannikov traveled from Russia to Turkiye in August 2022 and applied online for a UK passport, which was granted despite the sanctions, as his father was born in the UK.
He arrived in the UK to join his wife and two younger children in February 2023.
His brother was convicted for paying more than £40,000 in school fees for Ovsiannikov’s two youngest children to attend a school in London.
However, he was cleared of three counts of sanctions breach involving arranging car insurance for his brother and buying a Mercedes-Benz.
“We are resolutely committed to increasing pressure on Putin, his cronies, and all those who aid his barbaric war in Ukraine,” said Foreign Office sanctions minister Stephen Doughty.
Graeme Biggar, head of the National Crime Agency, said: “These convictions demonstrate not only that designated individuals are on our radar, but so are those who enable breaches of the regulations.”


Israel’s ambassador is ejected from African Union event

A general view of the flags of the member states of the African Union at the AU headquarters in Addis Ababa. (File/AFP)
Updated 09 April 2025
Follow

Israel’s ambassador is ejected from African Union event

  • The pan-African body has strong ties to the Palestinians, often inviting their leaders to address major gatherings
  • South Africa has brought a case against Israel at the ICJ, accusing it of genocide during its military operations in Gaza

ADDIS ABABA: Israel’s ambassador to Ethiopia was ejected from an African Union event this week and has described it as outrageous.
An Israeli official on Wednesday told The Associated Press the ejection from the annual event commemorating the 1994 Rwanda genocide was at the request of AU Commission Chairperson Mahmoud Youssouf. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to a journalist.
“The new African Union Commission chairperson chose to introduce anti-Israel political elements,” the ambassador, Avraham Nigusse, asserted Tuesday on social media. It “reveals a fundamental misunderstanding of the histories of both the Rwandan and Jewish peoples,” he added, saying he had been invited by Rwanda.
The spokesperson for Youssouf, a former foreign minister of Djibouti, did not respond to requests for comment. Youssouf started his four-year AU term in February.
A diplomat at the AU on Wednesday said Israel’s ambassador was removed because they no longer had observer status at the continental body based in Ethiopia’s capital, Addis Ababa. The diplomat spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to journalists.
Israel regained observer status at the AU in 2021, two decades after it was revoked over its conflict with the Palestinians, as Jerusalem sought wider ties with African nations. However, the observer status was suspended again in 2023 pending review by a committee of African heads of state.
They have yet to deliver a verdict. In 2023, a senior Israeli diplomat was evicted from the AU’s annual summit for not having proper accreditation.
The pan-African body has strong ties to the Palestinians, often inviting their leaders to address major gatherings.
Israel last month shattered a ceasefire and renewed its military offensive in Gaza. The territory’s Health Ministry says more than 50,000 Palestinians have been killed since the war with Hamas started with the militant group’s Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel.
South Africa, a prominent AU member, has brought a case against Israel at the International Court of Justice, accusing it of genocide during its military operations in Gaza. Israel has denied the allegations and called them outrageous.


Trump pauses tariffs on most nations for 90 days, raises taxes on Chinese imports

Updated 09 April 2025
Follow

Trump pauses tariffs on most nations for 90 days, raises taxes on Chinese imports

  • S&P 500 stock index jumped nearly 7 percent after the announcement
  • Trump says pause is because more than 75 Countries had reached out to the US for trade talks

WASHINGTON: Facing a global market meltdown, President Donald Trump on Wednesday abruptly backed down on his tariffs on most nations for 90 days, but raised the tax rate on Chinese imports to 125 percent.
It was seemingly an attempt to narrow what had been an unprecedented trade war between the US and most of the world to a showdown between the US and China. The S&P 500 stock index jumped nearly 7 percent after the announcement, but the precise details of Trump’s plans to ease tariffs on non-China trade partners were not immediately clear.
Trump posted on Truth Social that because “more than 75 Countries” had reached out to the US government for trade talks and have not retaliated in meaningful way “I have authorized a 90 day PAUSE, and a substantially lowered Reciprocal Tariff during this period, of 10 percent, also effective immediately.”
The 10 percent tariff was the baseline rate for most nations that went into effect on Saturday. It’s meaningfully lower than the 20 percent tariff that Trump had set for goods from the European Union, 24 percent on imports from Japan and 25 percent on products from South Korea. Still, 10 percent would represent an increase in the tariffs previously charged by the US government.
The announcement came after the global economy appeared to be in open rebellion against Trump’s tariffs as they took effect Wednesday, a signal that the US president was not immune from market pressures.
Business executives were warning of a potential recession caused by his policies, some of the top US trading partners are retaliating with their own import taxes and the stock market is quivering after days of decline.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the walk back was part of some grand negotiating strategy by Trump.
“President Trump created maximum negotiating leverage for himself,” she said, adding that the news media “clearly failed to see what President Trump is doing here. You tried to say that the rest of the world would be moved closer to China, when in fact, we’ve seen the opposite effect the entire world is calling the United States of America, not China, because they need our markets.”
But market pressures had been building for weeks ahead of Trump’s move.
Particularly worrisome was that US government debt had lost some of its luster with investors, who usually treat Treasury notes as a safe haven when there’s economic turbulence. Government bond prices had been falling, pushing up the interest rate on the 10-year US Treasury note to 4.45 percent. That rate eased after Trump’s reversal.
Gennadiy Goldberg, head of US rates strategy at TD Securities, said before the announcement that markets wanted to see a truce in the trade disputes.
“Markets more broadly, not just the Treasury market, are looking for signs that a trade de-escalation is coming,” he said. “Absent any de-escalation, it’s going to be difficult for markets to stabilize.”
John Canavan, lead analyst at the consultancy Oxford Economics, noted that while Trump said he changed course due to possible negotiations, he had previously indicated that the tariffs would stay in place.
“There have been very mixed messages on whether there would be negotiations,” Canavan said. “Given what’s been going on with the markets, he realized the safest thing to do is negotiate and put things on pause.”
Presidents often receive undue credit or blame for the state of the US economy as their time in the White House is subject to financial and geopolitical forces beyond their direct control.
But by unilaterally imposing tariffs, Trump is exerting extraordinary influence over the flow of commerce, creating political risks and pulling the market in different directions based on his remarks and social media posts. There still appear to be 25 percent tariffs on autos, steel and aluminum, with more imports set to be tariffed in the weeks ahead.
On CNBC, Delta Air Lines CEO Ed Bastian said the administration was being less strategic than it was during Trump’s first term. His company had in January projected it would have its best financial year in history, only to scrap its expectations for 2025 due to the economic uncertainty.
“Trying to do it all at the same time has created chaos in terms of being able to make plans,” he said, noting that demand for air travel has weakened.
Before Trump’s reversal, economic forecasters say his second term has had a series of negative and cascading impacts that could put the country into a downturn.
“Simultaneous shocks to consumer sentiment, corporate confidence, trade, financial markets as well as to prices, new orders and the labor market will tip the economy into recession in the current quarter,” said Joe Brusuelas, chief economist at the consultancy RSM.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has previously said it could take months to strike deals with countries on tariff rates, and the administration has not been clear on whether the baseline 10 percent tariffs imposed on most countries will stay in place. But in an appearance on “Mornings with Maria,” Bessent said the economy would “be back to firing on all cylinders” at a point in the “not too distant future.”
He said there has been an “overwhelming” response by “the countries who want to come and sit at the table rather than escalate.” Bessent mentioned Japan, South Korea, and India. “I will note that they are all around China. We have Vietnam coming today,” he said.
What’s not yet known is what Trump does with the rest of his tariff agenda. In a Tuesday night speech, he said taxes on imported drugs would happen soon.


Pressure builds on Afghans fearing arrest in Pakistan

Afghan refugees sit on a loaden vehicle at a holding centre ahead of their departure for Afghanistan.
Updated 09 April 2025
Follow

Pressure builds on Afghans fearing arrest in Pakistan

  • According to the UN refugee agency, more than 24,665 Afghans have left Pakistan since April 1, 10,741 of whom were deported

KARACHI: Convoys of Afghans pressured to leave Pakistan are driving to the border, fearing the “humiliation” of arrest, as the government’s crackdown on migrants sees widespread public support.
Islamabad wants to deport 800,000 Afghans after canceling their residence permits — the second phase of a deportation program which has already pushed out around 800,000 undocumented Afghans since 2023.
According to the UN refugee agency, more than 24,665 Afghans have left Pakistan since April 1, 10,741 of whom were deported.
“People say the police will come and carry out raids. That is the fear. Everyone is worried about that,” Rahmat Ullah, an Afghan migrant in the megacity Karachi told AFP.
“For a man with a family, nothing is worse than seeing the police take his women from his home. Can anything be more humiliating than this? It would be better if they just killed us instead,” added Nizam Gull, as he backed his belongings and prepared to return to Afghanistan.
Abdul Shah Bukhari, a community leader in one of the largest informal Afghan settlements in the coastal city, has watched multiple buses leave daily for the Afghan border, about 700 kilometers away.
The maze of makeshift homes has grown over decades with the arrival of families fleeing successive wars in Afghanistan. But now, he said “people are leaving voluntarily.”
“What is the need to cause distress or harassment?” said Bukhari.
Ghulam Hazrat, a truck driver, said he reached the Chaman border crossing with Afghanistan after days of police harassment in Karachi.
“We had to leave behind our home. We were being harassed every day.”
In Peshawar, the capital of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, on the Afghan border, police climb mosque minarets to order Afghans to leave: “The stay of Afghan nationals in Pakistan has expired. They are requested to return to Afghanistan voluntarily.”
Police warnings are not only aimed at Afghans, but also at Pakistani landlords.
“Two police officers came to my house on Sunday and told me that if there are any Afghan nationals living here they should be evicted,” Farhan Ahmad told AFP.
Human Rights Watch has slammed “abusive tactics” used to pressure Afghans to return to their country, “where they risk persecution by the Taliban and face dire economic conditions.”
In September 2023, hundreds of thousands of undocumented Afghans poured across the border into Afghanistan in the days leading up to a deadline to leave, after weeks of police raids and the demolition of homes.
After decades of hosting millions of Afghan refugees, there is widespread support among the Pakistani public for the deportations.
“They eat here, live here, but are against us. Terrorism is coming from there (Afghanistan), and they should leave; that is their country. We did a lot for them,” Pervaiz Akhtar, a university teacher, told AFP at a market in the capital Islamabad.
“Come with a valid visa, and then come and do business with us,” said Muhammad Shafiq, a 55-year-old businessman.
His views echo the Pakistani government, which for months has blamed rising violence in the border regions on “Afghan-backed perpetrators” and argued that the country can no longer support such a large migrant population.
However, analysts have said the deportation drive is political.
Relations between Kabul and Islamabad have soured since the Taliban returned to power in 2021.
“The timing and manner of their deportation indicates it is part of Pakistan’s policy of mounting pressure on the Taliban,” Maleeha Lodhi, the former permanent representative of Pakistan to the UN told AFP.
“This should have been done in a humane, voluntary and gradual way.”