Federal judge blocks Elon Musk’s DOGE from accessing sensitive US Treasury Department material

0 seconds of 36 secondsVolume 0%
Press shift question mark to access a list of keyboard shortcuts
00:00
00:36
00:36
 
Short Url
Updated 09 February 2025
Follow

Federal judge blocks Elon Musk’s DOGE from accessing sensitive US Treasury Department material

Federal judge blocks Elon Musk’s DOGE from accessing sensitive US Treasury Department material
  • US District Judge Paul Engelmayer issued the order after 19 Democratic attorneys general sued President Donald Trump

A federal judge early Saturday blocked Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency from accessing Treasury Department records that contain sensitive personal data such as Social Security and bank account numbers for millions of Americans.

US District Judge Paul Engelmayer issued the order after 19 Democratic attorneys general sued President Donald Trump. The case, filed in federal court in New York City, alleges the Trump administration allowed Musk’s team access to the Treasury Department’s central payment system in violation of federal law.

The payment system handles tax refunds, Social Security benefits, veterans’ benefits and much more, sending out trillions of dollars every year while containing an expansive network of Americans’ personal and financial data.

Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency, also known as DOGE, was created to discover and eliminate what the Trump administration has deemed to be wasteful government spending.

DOGE’s access to Treasury records, as well as its inspection of various government agencies, has ignited widespread concern among critics over the increasing power of Musk, while supporters have cheered at the idea of reining in bloated government finances.

Musk has made fun of criticism of DOGE on his X social media platform while saying it is saving taxpayers millions of dollars.

New York Attorney General Letitia James, whose office filed the lawsuit, said DOGE’s access to the Treasury Department’s data raises security problems and the possibility for an illegal freeze in federal funds.

“This unelected group, led by the world’s richest man, is not authorized to have this information, and they explicitly sought this unauthorized access to illegally block payments that millions of Americans rely on, payments for health care, child care and other essential programs,” James said in a video message released by her office.

James, a Democrat who has been one of Trump’s chief antagonists, said the president does not have the power to give away American’s private information to anyone he chooses, and he cannot cut federal payments approved by Congress.

Also on the lawsuit are Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Wisconsin.

The suit alleges that DOGE’s access to the Treasury records could interfere with funding already appropriated by Congress, which would exceed the Treasury Department’s statutory authority. The case also argues that the DOGE access violates federal administrative law and the US Constitution’s separation of powers doctrine.

It also accuses Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent of changing the department’s longstanding policy for protecting sensitive personally identifiable information and financial information to allow Musk’s DOGE team access to its payment systems.

“This decision failed to account for legal obligations to protect such data and ignored the privacy expectations of federal fund recipients,” including states, veterans, retirees, and taxpayers, the lawsuit says.

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong said it’s not clear what DOGE is doing with the information in the Treasury systems.

“This is the largest data breach in American history,” Tong said in a statement. “DOGE is an unlawfully constituted band of renegade tech bros combing through confidential records, sensitive data and critical payment systems. What could go wrong?”

The Treasury Department has said the review is about assessing the integrity of the system and that no changes are being made. According to two people familiar with the process, Musk’s team began its inquiry looking for ways to suspend payments made by the US Agency for International Development, which Trump and Musk are attempting to dismantle. The two people spoke with The Associated Press on condition of anonymity for fear of retaliation.

Separately, Democratic lawmakers are seeking a Treasury Department investigation of DOGE’s access to the government’s payment system.

Also, labor unions and advocacy groups have sued to block the payments system review over concerns about its legality. A judge in Washington on Thursday temporarily restricted access to two employees with “read only” privileges.


Somalia’s army and peacekeepers recapture key town from militants

A general view of shoes scattered near the site of a suicide bombing in Mogadishu on May 18, 2025. (AFP)
A general view of shoes scattered near the site of a suicide bombing in Mogadishu on May 18, 2025. (AFP)
Updated 10 sec ago
Follow

Somalia’s army and peacekeepers recapture key town from militants

A general view of shoes scattered near the site of a suicide bombing in Mogadishu on May 18, 2025. (AFP)
  • Al-Shabab claimed responsibility for an attack in March that narrowly missed the convoy of Somalia’s President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud, and fired shells at Mogadishu’s airport in April

MOGADISHU: The Somali army and international peacekeepers have “fully secured” a strategic town from Islamist militants after over a week of fighting, the Defense Ministry said.

Since the beginning of last year, the Al-Qaeda-affiliated Al-Shabab group has seized dozens of towns and villages in an offensive that has reversed nearly all of the gains made by the troubled Horn of Africa nation’s army in 2022 and 2023.

On Aug. 1, the African Union Support and Stabilization Mission in Somalia, or AUSSOM, launched an offensive to retake the town of Bariire, around 100 km west of the capital Mogadishu, in the Bas-Shabelle region.

Home to a major military operational base, Bariire fell to Al-Shabab in March without a fight after Somalia’s soldiers retreated, with the jihadists destroying a bridge vital to the military’s supply lines.

On Friday, the Somali Defense Ministry announced that the town had been recaptured by federal forces and Ugandan troops, under the auspices of AUSSOM.

“This afternoon, fully secured the strategic town of Bariire ... following a week-long offensive,” it said in a statement, putting Al-Shabab’s losses at “over 100 militants.”

There was no indication of casualty numbers among AUSSOM troops.

“The forces are now conducting clearance operations in the town surrounding the areas, seizing a significant cache of weapons and military supplies,” the ministry added.

Although AUSSOM has more than 10,000 troops in Somalia, Al-Shabab has in recent months racked up a spate of successes against the peacekeeping mission and its allies in the Somali army.

At the end of June, its fighters killed at least seven Ugandan soldiers deployed to another town in Bas-Shabelle.

Al-Shabab claimed responsibility for an attack in March that narrowly missed the convoy of Somalia’s President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud, and fired shells at Mogadishu’s airport in April.

 


Portugal’s top court blocks bill restricting immigration

View of the Portuguese parliament in Lisbon, Portugal, November 29, 2023. (REUTERS)
View of the Portuguese parliament in Lisbon, Portugal, November 29, 2023. (REUTERS)
Updated 11 min 2 sec ago
Follow

Portugal’s top court blocks bill restricting immigration

View of the Portuguese parliament in Lisbon, Portugal, November 29, 2023. (REUTERS)
  • The bill would have made hundreds of thousands of migrants legally resident in Portugal wait for two years before they could request permission for immediate family members to join them

LISBON: Portugal’s Constitutional Court has blocked a bill approved by the right-wing parliamentary majority that was designed to limit the inflow of immigrants, citing obstacles it creates for family members in joining immigrants legally resident in Portugal.

Immediately after the decision, President Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa sent the bill back to parliament, which is on recess until September. Last month, the president told the court to check the document for potential infringements of the principles of equality, proportionality and legal security.

The bill illustrates the rightward shift in politics in much of Europe, as governments try to fend off the rise of the far-right by being tougher on immigration.

The bill would have made hundreds of thousands of migrants legally resident in Portugal wait for two years before they could request permission for immediate family members to join them. Only highly skilled workers and investors with special residence permits would be exempt.

The court ruled that the bill was “likely to lead to the separation of family members” of foreign citizens legally resident in Portugal, which it said would be a “violation of the rights enshrined in the constitution.”

Last year, the government scrapped a program that allowed migrants entering Portugal on a tourist visa or waiver to stay and get residence permits if they find work.

Immigrants from the Community of Portuguese Language Countries still enjoy most such privileges but the bill would impose the requirement of a long-term work or residence visa that they would need to apply for in the country of origin.

Parliament approved the bill on July 16 with support from the center-right ruling coalition and far-right Chega party, which emerged as the second-largest parliamentary force in a May general election.

Left-wing opposition parties have criticized the government for what they call an inhumane bill, and for allowing Chega to impose its anti-immigration agenda on the minority administration.

The government denies such accusations, arguing that immigration inflows require better controls, and has already said it intends to adjust the bill to the court’s objections.

 


Japan opposes Israel plan to take control of Gaza City

Japan opposes Israel plan to take control of Gaza City
Updated 09 August 2025
Follow

Japan opposes Israel plan to take control of Gaza City

Japan opposes Israel plan to take control of Gaza City
  • “Japan once again urges all parties to return to negotiations,” Minister Iwaya said
  • “Improving the catastrophic humanitarian situation in Gaza is an urgent priority”

TOKYO: Japan opposes Israel’s plan to take control of Gaza City as it undermines the realization of a two-state solution, Foreign Minister Iwaya Takeshi stated.

Japan is strongly concerned that this decision will further exacerbate the already dire humanitarian situation in Gaza.

“Japan once again urges all parties to return to negotiations and to work in good faith toward a ceasefire and the release of hostages,” Minister Iwaya said in an official statement issued by the Ministry.

“Improving the catastrophic humanitarian situation in Gaza is an urgent priority. Japan calls on Israel to take substantive measures to end the serious humanitarian crisis, including starvation, and reiterates our strong demand for its full compliance with international law, including international humanitarian law,” the statement added.

Japan has consistently supported a two-state solution, whereby Israel and a future independent Palestinian state live side by side in peace and security, through confidence building and negotiations between the parties.

Japan remains committed to continuing to work for its realization, according to the statement.


Philippines’ Marcos moves to address online gambling crisis amid calls for ban 

Philippines’ Marcos moves to address online gambling crisis amid calls for ban 
Updated 09 August 2025
Follow

Philippines’ Marcos moves to address online gambling crisis amid calls for ban 

Philippines’ Marcos moves to address online gambling crisis amid calls for ban 
  • Government has been raking in significant revenue from gaming sites
  • Filipino lawmakers divided between tighter regulation and outright ban

MANILA: Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. will examine policy options to address the online gambling crisis gripping the nation, his office said on Saturday, as calls mount for the government to enact tighter regulations, or ban internet betting completely.

Concerns are growing over the rising number of Filipinos battling addiction to online gambling, which has become more accessible through social media and e-wallet platforms. 

Marcos is planning to convene a conference of stakeholders to help develop a policy to tackle the crisis, the Presidential Communications Office said in a statement issued on Saturday. 

“The president underscored the need to carefully examine policy options, saying an outright ban on online gambling is not (necessarily the) solution,” the statement read.  

Marcos recently told a media gathering that “a ban will not take care of the problem,” adding that his administration seeks to identify its root cause. 

“We really have this tendency sometimes, when there’s a problem, we just ban it. It’s not necessarily the solution,” Marcos said, according to a transcript supplied by his office. “Maybe it is. Maybe after all the discussions, we’ll conclude that a ban is necessary — then we’ll implement a ban. But let’s study it properly. Let’s not jump into it impulsively. We have to be measured in our responses. If it comes down to a ban, then we will ban. But if there are better solutions than a ban, we will take those on.”

Online gambling has been called a “silent epidemic” in the Philippines, amid a surge in cases that have sometimes reportedly torn families apart, depleted savings and pushed students into financial ruin. 

While there is no official data on how many Filipinos are addicted to online gambling, a 2023 survey by Capstone-Intel found that 64 percent of the nation’s 117 million-strong population had tried online betting. More than 80 gaming platforms run by local operators are legally registered with the government, and the revenue from e-games has also become a key source of government revenue. 

In the first half of 2025, the government’s gaming regulator — the Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corporation — recorded a gross gaming revenue of 114.83 billion pesos, (around $2 billion) from the e-gaming sector alone, accounting for more than 50 percent of the government’s total gaming revenues over the same period.

Last month, Senator Juan Miguel Zubiri filed a bill seeking to ban all forms of online gambling in the country, saying in a statement issued on July 4 that the practice was “quietly harming” Filipinos, especially minors and the most vulnerable. 

The Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines has also called on the government to “declare any type of online gambling illegal.” CBCP president Cardinal Pablo Virgilio David said in a pastoral letter: “This is no longer a simple problem of individuals. It is now a public health crisis in our society, just like drug addiction, alcoholism and other types of addiction. It destroys not only the individual but also their families.”

Others, like Senator Sherwin Gatchalian, are pushing for tighter regulations — including raising the minimum age of players from 18 to 21 and prohibiting e-wallets from providing direct links to online gambling platforms — rather than an outright ban. 

DigiPlus Interactive, which operates gaming sites BingoPlus, ArenaPlus and GameZone, has said that banning licensed platforms “does not eliminate demand for online gaming, but merely shifts users to unregulated black markets,” and that it supports tighter regulation. 

 


UN plastic pollution treaty talks progress not ‘sufficient’: chair

UN plastic pollution treaty talks progress not ‘sufficient’: chair
Updated 09 August 2025
Follow

UN plastic pollution treaty talks progress not ‘sufficient’: chair

UN plastic pollution treaty talks progress not ‘sufficient’: chair
  • “Progress made has not been sufficient,” Ecuadoran diplomat Luis Vayas Valdivieso said
  • “We have arrived at a critical stage where a real push to achieve our common goal is needed“

GENEVA: Talks at the United Nations on forging a landmark treaty to combat the scourge of plastic pollution have made insufficient progress, the negotiations chair warned Saturday in a frank mid-way assessment.

The negotiations, which opened on Tuesday, have four days left to find consensus on a legally-binding instrument that would tackle the growing problem choking the environment.

“Progress made has not been sufficient,” Ecuadoran diplomat Luis Vayas Valdivieso told delegates in a blunt summary as all 184 country delegations gathered in the main assembly hall.

“We have arrived at a critical stage where a real push to achieve our common goal is needed,” ahead of the Thursday deadline.

“August 14 is not just a deadline for our work: it is a date by which we must deliver.”

The draft text as it stands, released publicly ahead of Saturday’s session, has now ballooned from 22 to 35 pages, with the number of brackets in the text going up from 371 to almost 1,500.

It does not specify which countries or groups inserted the proposed text — meaning the changes could have majority support or be backed by one country alone.

“Some articles still have unresolved issues and show little progress toward reaching a common understanding,” Valdivieso said.

“We have had two and a half years of opportunities for delegations to make proposals,” he said, adding: “there is no more time” for such interventions.

Countries have reconvened at the UN in Geneva to try and find common ground after the failure of what was supposed to be the fifth and final round of talks in Busan, South Korea, which closed in December without agreement.