What can be done about food waste?

Follow

What can be done about food waste?

What can be done about food waste?
Shutterstock illustration image
Short Url

This Sept. 29 marks the fifth International Day of Awareness of Food Loss and Waste. Held under the theme “Climate Finance for Food Loss and Waste Reduction,” this year’s day highlights the link between food and our climate goals.

Indeed, the UN Sustainable Development Goal of halving food waste by 2030 will prove critical to cutting emissions and rising to the challenges of environmental sustainability.

The UN Environment Programme’s latest Food Waste Index Report estimates that in 2022 household and retail food waste accounted for 19 percent of all food available to consumers, while at the same time 783 million people were affected by hunger.

Households alone are responsible for generating 60 percent of all food waste. It is estimated that households waste the equivalent of at least one billion meals per day around the globe. This translates to approximately 1.3 meals per day for every individual affected by hunger.

Food waste is not something that occurs in rich countries alone. High-, upper-middle, and lower-middle-income countries differ in observed average levels of household food waste by just 7 kg, per capita, per year.

The world also faces a growing demand for a greater quantity, quality, and diversity of food. The global population is expected to grow from 7.2 billion in 2010 to more than 9 billion by 2050, with corresponding food demand predicted to increase by 60 percent.

Food waste contributes to climate change as it generates 8 to 10 percent of the greenhouse gases responsible for global warming.

Addressing food waste requires action on both an individual and a systemic level.

We must reimagine sustainable food systems that ensure the production and consumption of sufficient, affordable, and nutritious food, while also conserving the natural resources and ecosystems on which food systems depend.

We cannot tackle this problem without the necessary tools to measure it accurately. Reliable data is essential for making informed decisions and implementing effective solutions.

Countries should therefore use the Food Waste Index to consistently measure waste, establish strong national baselines, and track progress.

Unfortunately, only a handful of countries have gathered comprehensive food waste data, which is crucial for understanding the scope of the issue, identifying key problem areas, and evaluating the effectiveness of interventions.

Behavioral change is also essential, supported by robust regulations that integrate food waste solutions into national strategies and promote a circular economy.

It is of utmost importance that financing is secured to combat food waste in the global effort to meet the climate goals and advance the 2030 UN SDGs.

Sami Dimassi

In West Asia, it is estimated that 100 to 150 kg per capita of food waste occurs at the household stage per year. The region suffers from severe climate stress, including high temperatures and water scarcity, and relies heavily on food imports to meet the nutritional needs of its citizens.

Meanwhile, the region’s cultural diversity, varied diets and traditions often complicate food management, resulting in increased levels of waste.

Furthermore, weak infrastructure, especially for cool storage, coupled with armed conflicts, hamper efforts to mitigate food waste.

Higher seasonal temperatures, extreme heat events, and droughts make it more challenging to store, process, transport, and sell food safely, often leading to significant volumes being wasted.

As of 2022, only 21 countries have included food loss and waste reduction in their national climate plans.

The upcoming 2025 revision process of the Nationally Determined Contributions and the National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans are a key opportunity to raise climate ambition by integrating food loss and waste.

The UN Environment Programme has always played a crucial role in this regard, with successful campaigns such as the “Recipe of Change,” led by UNEP Regional Office for West Asia, which targets households, the hospitality industry, retail, and educational institutions.

During the month of Ramadan, in cooperation with the Hilton Hotels Chain, the campaign helped bring about a considerable reduction of food waste in hotel kitchens of 61 percent in 2023 and a further 21 percent in 2024, with a growing number of hotels joining the initiative.

We have proven that collective action can lead to substantial reductions in food waste.

Furthermore, we are committed to support the Global Cooling Pledge through working with our partners on implementing efficient cooling systems in the food supply chain, which can dramatically minimize waste.

As we mark the International Day of Awareness of Food Loss and Waste, we stress that it is of utmost importance that financing is secured to combat food waste in the global effort to meet the climate goals and advance the 2030 UN SDGs.

Sami Dimassi is the UN Environment Programme’s representative and regional director for West Asia

 

 

Disclaimer: Views expressed by writers in this section are their own and do not necessarily reflect Arab News' point of view

Pakistan deputy PM in Washington to discuss trade, economic cooperation

Pakistan deputy PM in Washington to discuss trade, economic cooperation
Updated 3 min 32 sec ago
Follow

Pakistan deputy PM in Washington to discuss trade, economic cooperation

Pakistan deputy PM in Washington to discuss trade, economic cooperation
  • Pakistan, US have been in talks after Washington announced a 29 percent ‘reciprocal tariff’ on Pakistani exports in April
  • The US is Pakistan’s top export destination, with shipments totaling 5.44 billion dollars in fiscal year 2023-2024

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s deputy prime minister and foreign minister, Ishaq Dar, has arrived in Washington to discuss trade, economic cooperation and other matters, the Pakistani foreign ministry said on Friday.

Pakistan and the United States (US) have been engaged in talks after Washington announced a 29 percent “reciprocal tariff” on Pakistani exports in April. Islamabad said the move, paused in June for a 90-day period, may undercut its fragile, export-led recovery.

The US is Pakistan’s top export destination, with shipments totaling $5.44 billion in fiscal year 2023-2024, according to official data. From July 2024 to February 2025, exports rose 10 percent from a year earlier.

Deputy PM Dar, who was received by Pakistan’s Ambassador Rizwan Saeed Sheikh upon arrival in Washington, is scheduled to meet US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Friday, according to the Pakistani foreign ministry.

“The meeting will discuss important facets of Pakistan-US relations exploring ways and means to strengthen bilateral ties, with a particular focus on promoting trade, investment and economic cooperation,” the Pakistani foreign ministry said.

“The Deputy Prime Minister/Foreign Minister is also scheduled to speak at the US think tank, The Atlantic Council, sharing Pakistan’s perspective on regional and global issues as well as the future of Pakistan-US relations.”

Nearly 90 percent of Pakistan’s exports to the US are textiles, a sector that is most vulnerable to the duties. The South Asian country is also seeking to diversify its trade destinations and export base to mitigate risks related to its international trade as it recovers from a macroeconomic crisis under a $7 billion International Monetary Fund (IMF) program.

Pakistan’s Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb said last week that Islamabad and Washington are exploring a shift in their economic engagement from a trade-focused relationship to one anchored in long-term investment, following his meeting with US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer in Washington.

“One thing we discussed was that we have to move beyond the immediate trade imperative for it to be brought into the next level and bring in a real step change,” Aurangzeb said.

“So, the investment imperative will come forward, and areas have already been identified in terms of minerals and mining, in terms of AI [artificial intelligence], in terms of digital infrastructure [and] crypto,” he continued. “We feel that this will be a real game changer, God willing, in terms of the relationship and the economic relationship between Pakistan and the United States.”

The Pakistani finance chief said both sides were committed to resolving outstanding trade issues to move “toward the finishing line” and begin investment-related discussions “very quickly.”


Europeans and Iran meet in Istanbul as the return of sanctions looms over nuclear deadlock

Europeans and Iran meet in Istanbul as the return of sanctions looms over nuclear deadlock
Updated 12 min 19 sec ago
Follow

Europeans and Iran meet in Istanbul as the return of sanctions looms over nuclear deadlock

Europeans and Iran meet in Istanbul as the return of sanctions looms over nuclear deadlock
  • The talks are centered on the possibility of reimposing sanctions on Iran that were lifted in 2015 in exchange for Iran accepting restrictions and monitoring of its nuclear program
  • European leaders have said the reinstating of sanctions will start by the end of August if there is no progress on containing Iran’s nuclear program

ISTANBUL: Iranian and European diplomats are set to meet in Istanbul Friday to embark on the latest drive to unpick the deadlock over Tehran’s nuclear program.

Representatives from Britain, France and Germany, known as the E3 nations, will gather at the Iranian consulate building for the first talks since Iran’s 12-day war with Israel in June, which involved US bombers striking nuclear-related facilities.

The talks are centered on the possibility of reimposing sanctions on Iran that were lifted in 2015 in exchange for Iran accepting restrictions and monitoring of its nuclear program.

The return of sanctions, known as a “snapback” mechanism, “remains on the table,” according to a European diplomat speaking on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the talks.

“A possible delay in triggering snapback has been floated to the Iranians on the condition that there is credible diplomatic engagement by Iran, that they resume full cooperation with the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency), and that they address concerns about their highly-enriched uranium stockpile,” the diplomat said.

European leaders have said sanctions will resume by the end of August if there is no progress on containing Iran’s nuclear program.

Tehran, meanwhile, has said the US, which withdrew from the 2015 deal during President Donald Trump ‘s first term, needs to rebuild faith in its role in negotiations.

Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi said Iran’s engagement was dependent on “several key principles” that included “rebuilding Iran’s trust – as Iran has absolutely no trust in the United States.”

In a social media post Thursday, he also said the talks shouldn’t be used “as a platform for hidden agendas such as military action.” Gharibabadi insisted that Iran’s right to enrich uranium “in line with its legitimate needs” be respected and sanctions removed.

Iran has repeatedly threatened to leave the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, which commits it to refrain from developing nuclear weapons, if sanctions return.

Friday’s talks will be held at the deputy ministerial level, with Iran sending Deputy Foreign Minister Majid Takht-e Ravanchi. A similar meeting was held in Istanbul in May. The identity of the E3 representatives were not immediately clear but the European Union’s deputy foreign policy commissioner is expected to attend.

The UK, France and Germany were signatories to the 2015 deal, alongside the US, Russia and China. When the US withdrew in 2018, Trump insisted the agreement wasn’t tough enough. Under the original deal, neither Russia nor China can veto reimposed sanctions.

Since the Israeli and US strikes on Iran, which saw American B-52 bombers hit three nuclear sites, Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has accused the E3 of hypocrisy, saying they failed to uphold their obligations while supporting Israel’s attacks.

Against the backdrop of the conflict, which saw Iran respond with missile attacks on Israel and a strike on a US base in Qatar, the road ahead remains uncertain

While European officials have said they want to avoid further conflict and are open to a negotiated solution, they have warned that time is running out.

Tehran maintains it is open to diplomacy, though it recently suspended cooperation with the IAEA.

A central concern for Western powers was highlighted when the IAEA reported in May that Iran’s stockpile of uranium enriched to 60 percent – just below weapons-grade level – had grown to over 400 kilograms (882 pounds).

In an interview with Al Jazeera that aired Wednesday, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said Iran is prepared for another war and reiterated that its nuclear program will continue within the framework of international law while adding the country had no intention of pursuing nuclear weapons.

A spokesman for Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization said Thursday the country’s nuclear industry would “grow back and thrive again” after the recent attacks by Israel and the US


US lifts sanctions on Myanmar junta allies after general praises Trump

US lifts sanctions on Myanmar junta allies after general praises Trump
Updated 19 min 2 sec ago
Follow

US lifts sanctions on Myanmar junta allies after general praises Trump

US lifts sanctions on Myanmar junta allies after general praises Trump
  • Human Rights Watch describes the American move ‘extremely worrying’
  • Suggests major shift was underway in US policy toward Myanmar’s military

WASHINGTON: The United States lifted sanctions designations on several allies of Myanmar’s ruling generals on Thursday, two weeks after the head of the ruling junta praised President Donald Trump and called for an easing of sanctions in a letter responding to a tariff warning.

Human Rights Watch called the move “extremely worrying” and said it suggested a major shift was underway in US policy toward Myanmar’s military, which overthrew a democratically elected government in 2021 and has been implicated in crimes against humanity and genocide.

A notice from the US Treasury Department said KT Services & Logistics and its founder, Jonathan Myo Kyaw Thaung; the MCM Group and its owner Aung Hlaing Oo; and Suntac Technologies and its owner Sit Taing Aung; and another individual, Tin Latt Min, were being removed from the US sanctions list. KT Services & Logistics and Jonathan Myo Kyaw Thaung were added to the sanctions list in January 2022 under the Biden administration in a step timed to mark the first anniversary of the military seizure of power in Myanmar that plunged the country into chaos.

Sit Taing Aung and Aung Hlaing Oo were placed on the sanctions list the same year for operating in Myanmar’s defense sector. Tin Latt Min, identified as another close associate of the military rulers, was placed on the list in 2024 to mark the third anniversary of the coup.

The Treasury Department did not explain the reason for the move, and the White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

On July 11, Myanmar’s ruling military general, Min Aung Hlaing, asked Trump in a letter for a reduction in the 40 percent tariff rate on his country’s exports to the US and said he was ready to send a negotiating team to Washington if needed.

“The senior general acknowledged the president’s strong leadership in guiding his country toward national prosperity with the spirit of a true patriot,” state media said at the time.

In his response to a letter from Trump notifying Myanmar of the tariff to take effect on August 1, Min Aung Hlaing proposed a reduced rate of 10 percent to 20 percent, with Myanmar slashing its levy on US imports to a range of zero to 10 percent.

Min Aung Hlaing also asked Trump “to reconsider easing and lifting the economic sanctions imposed on Myanmar, as they hinder the shared interests and prosperity of both countries and their peoples.” Myanmar is one of the world’s main sources of sought-after rare earth minerals used in high-tech defense and consumer applications. Securing supplies of the minerals is a major focus for the Trump administration in its strategic competition with China, which is responsible for 90 percent of rare earth processing capacity. Most of Myanmar’s rare earth mines are in areas controlled by the Kachin Independence Army (KIA), an ethnic group fighting the junta, and are processed in China.

John Sifton, Asia advocacy director of Human Rights Watch, called the US move “shocking” and its motivation unclear.

“The action suggests a major shift is underway in US policy, which had centered on punitive action against Myanmar’s military regime, which only four years ago carried out a coup d’etat against a democratically elected government and is implicated in crimes against humanity and genocide,” he said in an emailed statement.

“The decision will cause deep concern among victims of the Myanmar military and everyone who has been fighting and advocating for a return to democratic rule in Myanmar,” Sifton said.


Tropical storm adds to Philippines’ weather toll with 25 dead and 278,000 evacuated this week

Tropical storm adds to Philippines’ weather toll with 25 dead and 278,000 evacuated this week
Updated 26 min 31 sec ago
Follow

Tropical storm adds to Philippines’ weather toll with 25 dead and 278,000 evacuated this week

Tropical storm adds to Philippines’ weather toll with 25 dead and 278,000 evacuated this week
  • Tropical storm Co-may, locally called Emong, made landfall Thursday night with maximum sustained winds of 120kph hour and gusts of up to 165kph
  • At least 77 towns and cities, mostly in Luzon, have declared a state of calamity, a designation that speeds emergency funds and freezes the prices of commodities

MANILA: A tropical storm was blowing across the Philippines’ mountainous north Friday, worsening more than a week of bad weather that has caused at least 25 deaths and prompted evacuations in villages affected by flooding and landslides.

The storm was Typhoon Co-may when it made landfall Thursday night in the town of Agno in Pangasinan province with maximum sustained winds of 120 kilometers (74 miles) per hour and gusts of up to 165 kph (102 mph). It was weakening as it advanced northeastward and had sustained winds of 100 kph (62 mph) Friday morning.

Co-may was intensifying seasonal monsoon rains that had swamped a large swath of the country for more than a week.

Disaster-response officials have received reports of at least 25 deaths since last weekend, mostly due to flash floods, toppled trees, landslides and electrocution. Eight other people were reported missing.

There were no immediate reports of deaths or injuries directly caused by Co-may, locally called Emong, the fifth weather disturbance to hit the Philippines since the rainy season started in last month. More than a dozen more tropical storms were expected to batter the Southeast Asian country the rest of the year, forecasters said.

The government shut down schools in metropolitan Manila for the third day Friday and suspended classes in 35 provinces in the main northern region of Luzon. At least 77 towns and cities, mostly in Luzon, have declared a state of calamity, a designation that speeds emergency funds and freezes the prices of commodities, including rice.

The days of stormy weather have forced 278,000 people to leave their homes for safety in emergency shelters or relatives’ homes. Nearly 3,000 houses have been damaged, the government’s disaster response agency said.

Travel by sea and air has been restricted in northern provinces being pounded or in the typhoon’s path.

Thousands of army forces, police, coast guard personnel, firefighters and civilian volunteers have been deployed to help rescue people in villages swamped in floodwaters or isolated due to roads blocked by landslides, fallen trees and boulders.

After returning from his White House meeting with US President Donald Trump, President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. visited emergency shelters Thursday in Rizal province to help distribute food packs to displaced residents. He later convened an emergency meeting with disaster-response officials, where he underscored the need for the government and the people to adapt to and brace for climate change and the larger number of and more unpredictable natural calamities it’s setting off.

“Everything has changed,” Marcos said. “Let’s not say, `The storm may come, what will happen?’ because the storm will really come.”

The United States, Manila’s longtime treaty ally, has pledged to provide military aircraft to airlift food and other aid to remote island provinces and the countryside if the calamity worsens, the Philippines military said.

The Philippines, which lies between the Pacific Ocean and the South China Seas, is battered by about 20 typhoons and storms each year. It’s often hit by earthquakes and has about two dozen active volcanoes, making it one of the world’s most disaster-prone countries.


Columbia genocide scholar says she may leave over university’s new definition of antisemitism

Columbia genocide scholar says she may leave over university’s new definition of antisemitism
Updated 26 min 7 sec ago
Follow

Columbia genocide scholar says she may leave over university’s new definition of antisemitism

Columbia genocide scholar says she may leave over university’s new definition of antisemitism
  • The university recently adopted the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s definition of antisemitism
  • Columbia University genocide scholar Marianne Hirsch, is reconsidering her teaching role

NEW YORK: For years, Marianne Hirsch, a prominent genocide scholar at Columbia University, has used Hannah Arendt’s book about the trial of a Nazi war criminal, “Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil,” to spark discussion among her students about the Holocaust and its lingering traumas.

But after Columbia’s recent adoption of a new definition of antisemitism, which casts certain criticism of Israel as hate speech, Hirsch fears she may face official sanction for even mentioning the landmark text by Arendt, a philosopher who criticized Israel’s founding.

For the first time since she started teaching five decades ago, Hirsch, the daughter of two Holocaust survivors, is now thinking of leaving the classroom altogether.

“A university that treats criticism of Israel as antisemitic and threatens sanctions for those who disobey is no longer a place of open inquiry,” she told The Associated Press. “I just don’t see how I can teach about genocide in that environment.”

Hirsch is not alone. At universities across the country, academics have raised alarm about growing efforts to define antisemitism on terms pushed by the Trump administration, often under the threat of federal funding cuts.

Promoted by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, the definition lists 11 examples of antisemitic conduct, such as applying “double standards” to Israel, comparing the country’s policies to Nazism or describing its existence as “a racist endeavor.”

Ahead of a $220 million settlement with the Trump administration announced Wednesday, Columbia agreed to incorporate the IHRA definition and its examples into its disciplinary process. It has been endorsed in some form by Harvard, Yale and dozens of other universities.

While supporters say the semantic shift is necessary to combat evolving forms of Jewish hate, civil liberties groups warn it will further suppress pro-Palestinian speech already under attack by President Donald Trump.

For Hirsch, the restrictions on drawing comparisons to the Holocaust and questioning Israel’s founding amount to “clear censorship,” which she fears will chill discussions in the classroom and open her and other faculty up to spurious lawsuits.

“We learn by making analogies,” Hirsch said. “Now the university is saying that’s off-limits. How can you have a university course where ideas are not up for discussion or interpretation?”

A spokesperson for Columbia didn’t respond to an emailed request for comment.

The ‘weaponization’ of an educational framework

When he first drafted the IHRA definition of antisemitism two decades ago, Kenneth Stern said he “never imagined it would one day serve as a hate speech code.”

At the time, Stern was working as the lead antisemitism expert at the American Jewish Committee. The definition and its examples were meant to serve as a broad framework to help European countries track bias against Jews, he said.

In recent years, Stern has spoken forcefully against what he sees as its “weaponization” against pro-Palestinian activists, including anti-Zionist Jews.

“People who believe they’re combating hate are seduced by simple solutions to complicated issues,” he said. “But when used in this context, it’s really actually harming our ability to think about antisemitism.”

Stern said he delivered that warning to Columbia’s leaders last fall after being invited to address them by Claire Shipman, then a co-chair of the board of trustees and the university’s current interim president.

The conversation seemed productive, Stern said. But in March, shortly after the Trump administration said it would withhold $400 million in federal funding to Columbia over concerns about antisemitism, the university announced it would adopt the IHRA definition for “training and educational” purposes.

Then last week, days before announcing a deal with the Trump administration to restore that funding, Shipman said the university would extend the IHRA definition for disciplinary purposes, deploying its examples when assessing “discriminatory intent.”

“The formal incorporation of this definition will strengthen our response to and our community’s understanding of modern antisemitism,” Shipman wrote.

Stern, who now serves as director of the Bard Center for the Study of Hate, called the move “appalling,” predicting it would spur a new wave of litigation against the university while further curtailing pro-Palestinian speech.

Already, the university’s disciplinary body has faced backlash for investigating students who criticized Israel in op-eds and other venues, often at the behest of pro-Israel groups.

“With this new edict on IHRA, you’re going to have more outside groups looking at what professors are teaching, what’s in the syllabus, filing complaints and applying public pressure to get people fired,” he said. “That will undoubtedly harm the university.”

Calls to ‘self-terminate’

Beyond adopting the IHRA definition, Columbia has also agreed to place its Middle East studies department under new supervision, overhaul its rules for protests and coordinate antisemitism trainings with groups like the Anti-Defamation League.

Earlier this week, the university suspended or expelled nearly 80 students who participated in pro-Palestinian demonstrations.

Kenneth Marcus, chair of the Louis D. Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law, said Columbia’s actions were an overdue step to protect Jewish students from harassment.

He dismissed faculty concerns about the IHRA definition, which he said would “provide clarity, transparency and standardization” to the university’s effort to root out antisemitism.

“There are undoubtedly some Columbia professors who will feel they cannot continue teaching under the new regime,” Marcus said. “To the extent that they self-terminate, it may be sad for them personally, but it may not be so bad for the students at Columbia University.”

But Hirsch, the Columbia professor, said she was committed to continuing her long-standing study of genocides and their aftermath.

Part of that work, she said, will involve talking to students about Israel’s “ongoing ethnic cleansing and genocide” in Gaza, where more than 58,000 Palestinians have died, over half of them women and children, according to Gaza’s Health Ministry.

“With this capitulation to Trump, it may now be impossible to do that inside Columbia,” Hirsch said. “If that’s the case, I’ll continue my work outside the university’s gates.”