France’s Marine Le Pen ‘will never forgive’ herself for expelling father

French far-right leader Marine Le Pen accompanies the hearse transporting the coffin that contain the remains of her father, former far-right National Front party leader Jean-Marie Le Pen, in Trinite-sur-Mer, western France, Saturday, Jan. 11, 2025. (AP)
French far-right leader Marine Le Pen accompanies the hearse transporting the coffin that contain the remains of her father, former far-right National Front party leader Jean-Marie Le Pen, in Trinite-sur-Mer, western France, Saturday, Jan. 11, 2025. (AP)
Short Url
Updated 14 January 2025
Follow

France’s Marine Le Pen ‘will never forgive’ herself for expelling father

France’s Marine Le Pen ‘will never forgive’ herself for expelling father
  • Jean-Marie Le Pen declared in 1987 that the Nazi gas chambers used to exterminate Jews are “just a detail in the history of World War II”

PARIS: French far-right leader Marine Le Pen said she will never forgive herself for expelling her father Jean-Marie Le Pen from her party, after he died last week aged 96.

Nicknamed “the devil of the Republic” by opponents, Jean-Marie Le Pen was often openly racist, made no secret of anti-Semitic views, for which he received criminal convictions, and boasted of torturing prisoners during the war against Algeria.

Marine Le Pen took over as head of the National Front (FN) in 2011 but rapidly took steps toward making the party an electable force, renaming it the National Rally (RN) and embarking on a policy known as dediabolization (de-demonization).

She slung her father out of the party for his anti-Semitic views in 2015. But the pair had reconciled in recent years.

“I will never forgive myself for this decision, because I know it caused him immense pain,” he told the Journal du dimanche (JDD) newspaper in an interview published on its website late Sunday.

“This decision was one of the most difficult of my life. And until the end of my life, I will always ask myself the question: ‘could I have done this differently?’,” she said.

Jean-Marie Le Pen declared in 1987 that the Nazi gas chambers used to exterminate Jews are “just a detail in the history of World War II.”

In 2014, he said of Patrick Bruel, a Jewish singer critical of Le Pen, that he would be part of “a batch we will get next time.”

Addressing such remarks, Marine Le Pen said: “It’s somewhat unfair to judge him solely on the basis of these controversies.”

After his long political career, “it is inevitable to have subjects that arouse controversy,” she argued, while saying it was “unfortunate” that Jean-Marie Le Pen “got bogged down in these provocations.”

The interview marked a rare insight from Marine Le Pen into her relationship with her father, who was buried on Saturday in a quiet family ceremony in his home region of Brittany in western France.

Marine Le Pen, who stood three times for the Elysee and is likely preparing another run in 2027, is extremely discreet about her private and family life.

News magazine Paris Match posted a picture of Marine Le Pen in tears on being informed of the news of her father’s death, but deleted the image following protests from the RN.

Jean-Marie Le Pen’s death was announced to AFP on Tuesday in a statement signed “Le Pen Family.”

But Marine Le Pen, who was on a plane taking her back from the cyclone-ravaged French island of Mayotte to mainland France, only learned of the news afterwards, during a stopover in Nairobi.

Some French media have interpreted this as a sign of conflict within her family and with her two sisters Marie-Caroline and Yann.

“At the time, I didn’t believe it (his death). Then... knowing that he was in very fragile health, I called my sister to find out what was going on. And she was the one who told me,” she said.

 

 


Trump and Putin: a strained relationship

Updated 2 sec ago
Follow

Trump and Putin: a strained relationship

Trump and Putin: a strained relationship
WASHINGTON: Donald Trump styles himself as a strongman. And that’s exactly what he sees in Vladimir Putin.
Their complicated relationship will be put to the test at a summit in Alaska on Friday, where the two leaders who claim to admire each other will seek to outmaneuver one another over how to end Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
While the two were close to a bromance during Trump’s first term (2017-2021), their relationship has grown strained during his second term. The US president has expressed anger with Putin for pressing on with his brutal three-year-old war in Ukraine, which Trump calls “ridiculous.”
Trump describes the summit as “really a feel-out meeting” to evaluate Putin’s readiness to negotiate an end to the war.
“I’m going to be telling him, ‘You’ve got to end this war,’” Trump said.
The two leaders notably have radically different negotiating strategies: the Republican real estate magnate usually banks on making a deal, while the Russian president tends to take the long view, confident that time is on his side.


Referring to Trump’s meeting with Putin, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Tuesday that Trump needs “to see him face to face... to make an assessment by looking at him.”
Trump praised Putin for accepting his invitation to come to the US state of Alaska, which was once a Russian colony.
“I thought it was very respectful that the president of Russia is coming to our country, as opposed to us going to his country or even a third place,” Trump said Monday.
It will be only the second one-on-one meeting between the men since a 2018 Helsinki summit.
Trump calls Putin smart and insists he’s always “had a very good relationship” with the Kremlin leader.
But when Russian missiles pounded Kyiv earlier this year, Trump accused him of “needlessly killing a lot of people,” adding in a social media post: “He has gone absolutely CRAZY!“
For his part, Putin has praised the Republican billionaire’s push to end the Ukraine war. “I have no doubt that he means it sincerely,” Putin said last year when Trump was running for president.
Since returning to the White House in January, the American president has forged a rapprochement with Putin, who has been sidelined by the international community since the February 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
Trump and Putin, aged 79 and 72 respectively, spoke for 90 minutes by phone in February, both expressing hope for a reset of relations.
But after a series of fruitless talks and continued deadly Russian bombing of Ukrainian cities, Trump has appeared increasingly frustrated.
“I am very disappointed with President Putin,” Trump told reporters last month. “I thought he was somebody that meant what he said. And he’ll talk so beautifully and then he’ll bomb people at night. We don’t like that.”


Trump and Putin have met six times, mostly on the sidelines of international events during Trump’s first term.
In his recent book “War,” Washington Post journalist Bob Woodward wrote that Trump spoke to Putin seven times between leaving the White House in 2021 and returning there earlier this year. The Kremlin denies this.
But the defining moment in their relationship remains the July 16, 2018 summit in the Finnish capital Helsinki. After a two-hour one-on-one meeting, Trump and Putin expressed a desire to mend relations between Washington and Moscow.
But Trump caused an uproar during a joint press conference by appearing to take at face value the Russian president’s assurances that Moscow did not attempt to influence the 2016 US presidential election — even though US intelligence agencies had unanimously confirmed that it did.
“I have great confidence in my intelligence people, but I will tell you that President Putin was extremely strong and powerful in his denial today,” Trump said. “He just said it’s not Russia. I will say this: I don’t see any reason why it would be.”
Given this history, Democratic Senator Jeanne Shaheen is worried about what could happen at the Trump-Putin summit.
“I am very concerned that President Putin will view this as a reward and another opportunity to further prolong the war instead of finally seeking peace,” she said.

South Korea prosecutors raid party HQ after ex-first lady arrested

South Korea prosecutors raid party HQ after ex-first lady arrested
Updated 2 min 33 sec ago
Follow

South Korea prosecutors raid party HQ after ex-first lady arrested

South Korea prosecutors raid party HQ after ex-first lady arrested
  • Former first lady Kim Keon Hee was arrested late Tuesday on a range of charges including stock manipulation and corruption, prosecutors said

SEOUL: South Korean prosecutors raided the headquarters of the former party of jailed ex-president Yoon Suk Yeol on Wednesday to gather evidence in an election meddling case against his wife, a day after she was arrested on corruption and other charges.

Former first lady Kim Keon Hee was arrested late Tuesday on a range of charges including stock manipulation and corruption, prosecutors said.

Her arrest came hours after Seoul Central District Court reviewed the prosecutors’ request for an arrest warrant against the 52-year-old.

The court granted the warrant, citing the risk of tampering with evidence, after prosecutors submitted an 848-page opinion laying out Kim’s alleged “unlawful acts.”

Prosecutors said Wednesday they raided the People Power Party office to collect evidence of Kim’s alleged meddling in parliamentary elections.

Yoon quit the party in May after his removal from office but endorsed its candidate in the snap presidential election that was won by the Democratic Party’s Lee Jae Myung.

Opposition leader Song Eon-seog slammed the raid as “nothing short of gangster behavior.”

“I cannot contain my outrage at the Lee Jae Myung administration’s ruthless political persecution and retaliation against the opposition, spearheaded by the special prosecution,” Song said at a news briefing.

With the arrest, South Korea now has a former president and first lady both behind bars for the first time in the nation’s history.

The charges against Kim include violations of capital market and financial investment laws, as well as political funds laws.

The arrest caps a dramatic fall for the former first couple after Yoon’s stunning martial law declaration on December 3, which saw soldiers deployed to parliament but was swiftly voted down by opposition MPs.

Yoon, a former top prosecutor, was impeached and removed from office in April over the martial law declaration, prompting the country to hold a snap election in June.

He has been in detention since July 10.

Last week, Kim underwent hours-long questioning by prosecutors, who filed for an arrest warrant the next day.

“I sincerely apologize for causing trouble despite being a person of no importance,” Kim said as she arrived at the prosecutors’ office on Wednesday.

Controversy has long surrounded Kim, with lingering questions about her alleged role in stock manipulation.

Public criticism was reignited in 2022 when a left-wing pastor filmed himself presenting her with a Dior handbag that she appeared to accept.

She is also accused of interfering in the nomination process for MPs in Yoon’s party, a violation of election laws.

Yoon, as president, vetoed three special investigation bills passed by the opposition-controlled parliament that sought to probe the allegations against Kim, with the last veto issued in late November.

A week later, Yoon declared martial law.

Investigators also searched an interior company allegedly linked to Kim in connection with suspected favoritism in repairs to the presidential office.

While she would typically have been held at the same detention center as her husband, prosecutors on Monday requested that she be detained at a separate facility about 20 kilometers (13 miles) away.

Her Presidential Security Service protection was terminated once the warrant was issued.

Kim can be held for up to 20 days as prosecutors prepare to formally indict her, legal expert Kim Nam-ju told AFP.

“Once Kim is indicted, she could remain detained for up to six months,” the lawyer said.

The former first lady can challenge the warrant in court as unlawful, “but given the current circumstances, there appears to be a high risk of evidence destruction, making it unlikely that the warrant will be revoked and the individual released,” he added.

“Another option is bail, but this too is not granted if there are concerns about the destruction of evidence.”


Vietnam wants to be the next Asian tiger and it’s overhauling its economy to make it happen

Vietnam wants to be the next Asian tiger and it’s overhauling its economy to make it happen
Updated 51 min 17 sec ago
Follow

Vietnam wants to be the next Asian tiger and it’s overhauling its economy to make it happen

Vietnam wants to be the next Asian tiger and it’s overhauling its economy to make it happen
  • Vietnam is launching its biggest economic overhaul in a generation, aiming to become Asia’s next “tiger economy with reforms focused on tech, green energy and AI
  • For the first time, the ruling Communist Party is calling Vietnam’s private sector the most important force in the economy

HANOI: Beneath red banners and a gold bust of revolutionary leader Ho Chi Minh in Hanoi’s central party school, Communist Party chief To Lam declared the arrival of “a new era of development” late last year. The speech was more than symbolic— it signaled the launch of what could be Vietnam’s most ambitious economic overhaul in decades.

Vietnam aims to get rich by 2045 and become Asia’s next “tiger economy” — a term used to describe the earlier ascent of countries like South Korea and Taiwan.

The challenge ahead is steep: Reconciling growth with overdue reforms, an aging population, climate risks and creaking institutions. There’s added pressure from President Donald Trump over Vietnam’s trade surplus with the US, a reflection of its astounding economic trajectory.

In 1990, the average Vietnamese could afford about $1,200 worth of goods and services a year, adjusted for local prices. Today, that figure has risen by more than 13 times to $16,385.

Vietnam’s transformation into a global manufacturing hub with shiny new highways, high-rise skylines and a booming middle class has lifted millions of its people from poverty, similar to China. But its low-cost, export-led boom is slowing, while the proposed reforms — expanding private industries, strengthening social protections, and investing in tech, green energy. It faces a growing obstacle in climate change.

“It’s all hands on deck...We can’t waste time anymore,” said Mimi Vu of the consultancy Raise Partners.

The export boom can’t carry Vietnam forever

Investment has soared, driven partly by US-China trade tensions, and the US is now Vietnam’s biggest export market. Once-quiet suburbs have been replaced with industrial parks where trucks rumble through sprawling logistics hubs that serve global brands.

Vietnam ran a $123.5 billion trade surplus with the US trade in 2024, angering Trump, who threatened a 46 percent US import tax on Vietnamese goods. The two sides appear to have settled on a 20 percent levy, and twice that for goods suspected of being transshipped, or routed through Vietnam to avoid US trade restrictions.

During negotiations with the Trump administration, Vietnam’s focus was on its tariffs compared to those of its neighbors and competitors, said Daniel Kritenbrink, a former US ambassador to Vietnam. “As long as they’re in the same zone, in the same ballpark, I think Vietnam can live with that outcome,” he said. But he added questions remain over how much Chinese content in those exports might be too much and how such goods will be taxed.

Vietnam was preparing to shift its economic policies even before Trump’s tariffs threatened its model of churning out low-cost exports for the world, aware of what economists call the “middle-income trap,” when economies tend to plateau without major reforms.

To move beyond that, South Korea bet on electronics, Taiwan on semiconductors, and Singapore on finance, said Richard McClellan, founder of the consultancy RMAC Advisory.

But Vietnam’s economy today is more diverse and complex than those countries were at the time and it can’t rely on just one winning sector to drive long-term growth and stay competitive as wages rise and cheap labor is no longer its main advantage.

It needs to make “multiple big bets,” McClellan said.

Vietnam’s game plan is hedging its bets

Following China’s lead, Vietnam is counting on high-tech sectors like computer chips, artificial intelligence and renewable energy, providing strategic tax breaks and research support in cities like Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh City, and Danang.

It’s also investing heavily in infrastructure, including civilian nuclear plants and a $67 billion North–South high-speed railway, that will cut travel time from Hanoi to Ho Chi Minh City to eight hours.

Vietnam also aspires to become a global financial center. The government plans two special financial centers, in bustling Ho Chi Minh City and in the seaside resort city of Danang, with simplified rules to attract foreign investors, tax breaks, support for financial tech startups, and easier ways to settle business disputes.

Underpinning all of this is institutional reform. Ministries are being merged, low-level bureaucracies have been eliminated and Vietnam’s 63 provinces will be consolidated into 34 to build regional centers with deeper talent pools.

Private business to take the lead

Vietnam is counting on private businesses to lead its new economic push — a seismic shift from the past.

In May, the Communist Party passed Resolution 68. It calls private businesses the “most important force” in the economy, pledging to break away from domination by state-owned and foreign companies.

So far, large multinationals have powered Vietnam’s exports, using imported materials and parts and low cost local labor. Local companies are stuck at the low-end of supply chains, struggling to access loans and markets that favored the 700-odd state-owned giants, from colonial-era beer factories with arched windows to unfashionable state-run shops that few customers bother to enter.

“The private sector remains heavily constrained,” said Nguyen Khac Giang of Singapore’s ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute.

Again emulating China, Vietnam wants “national champions” to drive innovation and compete globally, not by picking winners, but by letting markets decide. The policy includes easier loans for companies investing in new technology, priority in government contracts for those meeting innovation goals, and help for firms looking to expand overseas. Even mega-projects like the North-South High-Speed Rail, once reserved for state-run giants, are now open to private bidding.

By 2030, Vietnam hopes to elevate at least 20 private firms to a global scale. But Giang warned that there will be pushback from conservatives in the Communist Party and from those who benefit from state-owned firms.

A Closing Window from climate change

Even as political resistance threatens to stall reforms, climate threats require urgent action.

After losing a major investor over flood risks, Bruno Jaspaert knew something had to change. His firm, DEEP C Industrial Zones, houses more than 150 factories across northern Vietnam. So it hired a consultancy to redesign flood resilience plans.

Climate risk is becoming its own kind of market regulation, forcing businesses to plan better, build smarter, and adapt faster. “If the whole world will decide it’s a priority...it can go very fast,” said Jaspaert.

When Typhoon Yagi hit last year, causing $1.6 billion in damage, knocking 0.15 percent off Vietnam’s GDP and battering factories that produce nearly half the country’s economic output, roads in DEEP C industrial parks stayed dry.

Climate risks are no longer theoretical: If Vietnam doesn’t take strong action to adapt to and reduce climate change, the country could lose 12–14.5 percent of its GDP each year by 2050, and up to one million people could fall into extreme poverty by 2030, according to the World Bank.

Meanwhile, Vietnam is growing old before it gets rich.

The country’s “golden population” window — when working-age people outnumber dependents — will close by 2039 and the labor force is projected to peak just three years later. That could shrink productivity and strain social services, especially since families — and women in particular — are the default caregivers, said Teerawichitchainan Bussarawan of the Center for Family and Population Research at the National University of Singapore.

Vietnam is racing to pre-empt the fallout by expanding access to preventive health care so older adults remain healthier and more independent. Gradually raising the retirement age and drawing more women into the formal workforce would help offset labor gaps and promote “healthy aging,” Bussarawan said.


One of the world’s most polluted cities, Lagos, has banned single-use plastics. It’s not so easy

One of the world’s most polluted cities, Lagos, has banned single-use plastics. It’s not so easy
Updated 53 min 53 sec ago
Follow

One of the world’s most polluted cities, Lagos, has banned single-use plastics. It’s not so easy

One of the world’s most polluted cities, Lagos, has banned single-use plastics. It’s not so easy
  • In Geneva this week, countries including Nigeria are negotiating a treaty to end plastic pollution
  • The city’s over 20 million people contributed 870,000 tons of the world’s 57 million tons of plastic waste in 2024

LAGOS: Nigerian shop manager Olarewanju Ogunbona says he uses Styrofoam and plastic packs at least five times a day — nothing unusual in the megacity of Lagos, one of the world’s most plastics-polluted urban areas.

The city’s over 20 million people contributed 870,000 tons of the world’s 57 million tons of plastic waste in 2024. Lagos state authorities last month imposed a ban on single-use plastics, but residents say weak enforcement and the absence of alternatives have weakened its effectiveness.

Under the law that kicked off on July 1, the use of single-use plastics such as cutlery, plates and straws is banned and offenders risk their businesses being shut down. However, other forms of plastics, which make up a smaller percentage of the city’s waste, are still in use.

The ban is far from being fully implemented, as some shops still display Styrofoam packs on their shelves.

“Sellers are still using it very well,” said Ogunbona, who continues to buy his Styrofoam-packed meals.

A global treaty on plastics

In Geneva this week, countries including Nigeria are negotiating a treaty to end plastic pollution. Such talks broke down last year, with oil-producing countries opposed to any limits on plastic production. In large part, plastics are made from fossil fuels like oil and gas.

Lagos generates at least 13,000 tons of waste daily, almost a fifth of which is plastics, officials have said. In the absence of a proper waste management system, most of it ends up in waterways, clogging canals, polluting beaches and contributing to devastating floods.

Although the state government has promoted the ban on single-use plastics as a major step, watchdogs are skeptical.

“Its effectiveness is limited without strong enforcement, affordable alternatives for low-income vendors and meaningful improvements in the city’s overwhelmed waste management systems,” Olumide Idowu, a Lagos-based environmental activist, told The Associated Press.

The Lagos state government did not respond to a request for comment.

Scraping off labels with razor blades

With the quest for a better life driving millions of Nigerians to Lagos, some in the city are finding ways to manage the pollution. Recent years have seen a rise of private waste managers and sustainability groups helping to tackle the crisis.

At a sorting site in Obalende, a bustling commercial suburb adjacent to the upscale Ikoyi neighborhood, two women with razor blades scraped labels from plastic soft drink bottles. They uncapped the bottles and threw them into different nets, ready to be compressed and sold for recycling.

Competition has become tougher as more people join the work, the women said. The informal network of waste collectors sell to, or sort for, private waste management companies. They can make around around 5,000 naira ($3.26) a day.

But far more work is needed.

Manufacturers have a key role to play in tackling the plastic waste problem, according to Omoh Alokwe, co-founder of the Street Waste Company that operates in Obalende.

“They need to ... ensure that the plastics being produced into the environment are collected back and recycled,” Alokwe said.

Experts also call for a behavioral change among residents for the law banning single-use plastics to be effective.

Lagos residents need alternatives to plastics, shop owner Ogunbona said. Otherwise, “we will keep using them.”


Zelensky, European leaders to speak to Trump ahead of Putin summit

Zelensky, European leaders to speak to Trump ahead of Putin summit
Updated 13 August 2025
Follow

Zelensky, European leaders to speak to Trump ahead of Putin summit

Zelensky, European leaders to speak to Trump ahead of Putin summit
  • Trump agreed last week to the first US-Russia summit since 2021, abruptly shifting course after weeks of voicing frustration with Putin for resisting the US peace imitative
  • The unpredictability of how the summit will play out has fueled European fears that the US and Russian leaders could take far-reaching decisions and even seek to coerce Ukraine into an unfavorable deal

BRUSSELS/LONDON/KYIV: Europe and Ukraine’s leaders will speak to US President Donald Trump at a virtual meeting on Wednesday ahead of his summit with Russia’s Vladimir Putin, as they try to drive home the perils of selling out Kyiv’s interests in pursuit of a ceasefire.

Trump hosts Putin, a pariah in the West since Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine, at talks in Alaska on Friday that the US president has said will serve as a “feel-out” meeting in his efforts to end the Russo-Ukraine war.

Trump agreed last week to the first US-Russia summit since 2021, abruptly shifting course after weeks of voicing frustration with Putin for resisting the US peace imitative. Trump said his envoy had made “great progress” at talks in Moscow.

The US president says both Kyiv and Moscow will have to cede land to end the war. Russian troops have already occupied almost a fifth of Ukraine.

The unpredictability of how the summit will play out has fueled European fears that the US and Russian leaders could take far-reaching decisions and even seek to coerce Ukraine into an unfavorable deal.

“We are focusing now to ensure that it does not happen — engaging with US partners and staying coordinated and united on the European side. Still a lot of time until Friday,” said one senior official from eastern Europe.

Trump’s administration tempered expectations on Tuesday for major progress toward a ceasefire, calling his meeting with Putin in Alaska a “listening exercise.”

The video conference among Trump, Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky and the leaders of Germany, Finland, France, Britain, Italy, Poland and the European Union is expected to take place at 1200 GMT (1400 CET), a German government spokesperson said.

NATO’s secretary general will also attend the conference hosted by German Chancellor Friedrich Merz.

Ukraine hopes the meeting will serve — at least partially — as a European counterweight to the summit in Alaska.

European leaders, who are wary of provoking Trump’s ire, have repeatedly emphasized that they welcome his peace efforts, while underlining that there should be no deal about Ukraine without Ukraine’s participation.

Half a dozen senior European officials told Reuters that they see a risk of a deal being struck that is unfavorable for Europe and Ukraine’s security. They said European unity would be vital if that happened. A source familiar with internal US deliberations said it could not be ruled out that Trump would seek a deal directly with Putin without involving Ukraine or Europe. But the source voiced doubt about that, saying it could cause problems with Kyiv and the EU.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters on Tuesday the summit will be a “listening exercise” for Trump to hear what it will take to get to a deal.

After the call, Trump and Vice President JD Vance were expected to speak to European leaders at a separate online meeting at 1300 GMT (1500 CET), the German spokesperson said.

That will be followed at 1430 GMT by an online meeting of the “coalition of the willing,” a group of countries working on plans to support Ukraine in the event of a ceasefire.

MOUNTING BATTLEFIELD PRESSURE

A Gallup poll released last week found that 69 percent of Ukrainians favor a negotiated end to the war as soon as possible. But polls also show Ukrainians do not want peace at any cost if that means crushing concessions.

Ahead of the calls, Zelensky said it would be impossible for Kyiv to agree to a deal that would require it to withdraw its troops from the eastern Donbas region, a large swathe of which is already occupied by Russia.

That, he told reporters on Tuesday, would deprive Ukraine of a vast defensive network in the region, easing the way for Russia to mount a new push deeper into Ukraine in the future.

Territorial issues, he added, could only be discussed once a ceasefire has been put in place and Ukraine has received security guarantees.

Moscow’s troops have recently ramped up pressure on the battlefield, tightening their stranglehold on the cities of Pokrovsk and Kostyantynivka in eastern Ukraine.