From Egypt to Pakistan, Coke and Pepsi boycott over Gaza lifts local sodas 

From Egypt to Pakistan, Coke and Pepsi boycott over Gaza lifts local sodas 
A worker pushes a wood pilot loaded with packs of Cola Next at a warehouse in Karachi, Pakistan on May 9, 2024. (REUTERS)
Short Url
Updated 04 September 2024
Follow

From Egypt to Pakistan, Coke and Pepsi boycott over Gaza lifts local sodas 

From Egypt to Pakistan, Coke and Pepsi boycott over Gaza lifts local sodas 
  • In Pakistan, local colas like Cola Next and Pakola soared in popularity to become about 12% of soft drinks category from 2.5% previously 
  • Cola Next’s factories cannot meet the sharp surge in demand, CEO of brand’s parent company Mezan Beverages said in an interview 

KARACHI/CAIRO/NEW YORK: Coca-Cola and rival PepsiCo. spent hundreds of millions of dollars over decades building demand for their soft drinks in Muslim-majority countries including Egypt to Pakistan. 
Now, both face a challenge from local sodas in those countries due to consumer boycotts that target the globe-straddling brands as symbols of America, and by extension Israel, at a time of war in Gaza.
In Egypt, sales of Coke have cratered this year, while local brand V7 exported three times as many bottles of its own cola in the Middle East and the wider region than last year. In Bangladesh, an outcry forced Coca-Cola to cancel an ad campaign against the boycott. And across the Middle East, Pepsi’s rapid growth evaporated after the Gaza war started in October.
Pakistani corporate executive Sunbal Hassan kept Coke and Pepsi off her wedding menu in Karachi in April. She said she didn’t want to feel her money had reached the tax coffers of the United States, Israel’s staunchest ally.
“With the boycott, one can play a part by not contributing to those funds,” Hassan said. Instead, she served her wedding guests Pakistani brand Cola Next.




An Egyptian walks next to the bottles of Coca-Cola and other products on shelves, in Cairo, Egypt, on August 27, 2024. (REUTERS)

She is not alone. While market analysts say it is hard to put a dollar figure on lost sales and PepsiCo. and Coca-Cola still have growing businesses in several countries in the Middle East, Western beverage brands suffered a 7 percent sales decline in the first half of the year across the region, market researcher NielsenIQ says.




An Egyptian supermarket owner shows bottles of Egypt's local beverage brands Spiro Spathis and Diva Masr at his store, in Cairo, Egypt on September 1, 2024. (REUTERS)

In Pakistan, Krave Mart, a leading delivery app, has seen local cola rivals like Cola Next and Pakola soar in popularity to become about 12 percent of the soft drinks category, founder Kassim Shroff told Reuters this month. Before the boycott, the figure was closer to 2.5 percent.
Shroff said Pakola, which is ice-cream soda flavored, made up most of the purchases before the boycott. He declined to provide figures for Coca-Cola and PepsiCo. sales.
Consumer boycotts date back at least as far as an 18th century anti-slavery sugar protest in Britain. The strategy was used in the 20th century to fight apartheid in South Africa and has been widely wielded against Israel through the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement.




A Pepsi refrigerator is seen at a local corner store with Pepsi and its drinks displayed for sale in Isa Town, Bahrain, August on 30, 2024. (REUTERS)

Many consumers shunning Coca-Cola and PepsiCo. cite US support of Israel over decades, including in the current, ongoing war with Hamas. “Some consumers are deciding to make different options in their purchases because of the political perception,” PepsiCo. CEO Ramon Laguarta told Reuters in a July 11 interview, adding that boycotts are “impacting those particular geographies” such as Lebanon, Pakistan and Egypt.
“We will manage through it over time,” he said. “It’s not meaningful to our top line and bottom line at this point.”
PepsiCo’s total revenue from its Africa, Middle East and South Asia division was $6 billion in 2023, earnings releases show. The same year, Coca-Cola’s revenue from its Europe, Middle East and Africa region was $8 billion, company filings show.
In the six months following the Oct. 7 Hamas attacks on Israel that triggered the invasion of Gaza, PepsiCo. beverage volumes in the Africa, Middle East and South Asia division barely grew, after notching up 8 percent and 15 percent growth in the same quarters of 2022/23, the company said. Volumes of Coke sold in Egypt declined by double-digit percentage points in the six months ended June 28, according to data from Coca-Cola HBC, which bottles there. In the same period last year, volumes rose in high single digits.
Coca-Cola has said it does not fund military operations in Israel or any country. In response to a Reuters request, PepsiCo. said neither the company “nor any of our brands are affiliated with any government or military in the conflict.”
Palestinian-American businessman Zahi Khouri founded Ramallah-based Coca-Cola bottler National Beverage Company, which sells Coke in the West Bank. The company’s $25 million plant in Gaza, opened in 2016, has been destroyed in the war, he said. Employees were unharmed, he said.
Khouri said boycotts were a matter of personal choice but didn’t really help Palestinians. In the West Bank itself, he said, they had limited sales impact.
“Only ending the occupation would help the situation,” said Khouri, who supports the creation of a Palestinian state alongside Israel.
Israel’s government did not respond to a request for comment.
HISTORICAL TARGETS
The big soda companies are no stranger to pressure among the Muslim world’s hundreds of millions of consumers. After Coke opened a factory in Israel in the 1960s, it was hit by an Arab League boycott that lasted until the early 1990s and benefited Pepsi for years in the Middle East.
Coke still lags Pepsi’s market share in Egypt and Pakistan, according to market research firm GlobalData.
PepsiCo, which entered Israel in the early 1990s, itself faced boycotts when it purchased Israel’s SodaStream for $3.2 billion in 2018.
In recent years though, Muslim-majority countries with young, rising populations have provided some of the soda giants’ fastest growth. In Pakistan alone, Coca-Cola says it has invested $1 billion since 2008, yielding years of double-digit sales growth. PepsiCo. had similar gains, according to securities filings.
Now, both are losing ground to local brands.
Cola Next, which is cheaper than Coke and Pepsi, changed its ad slogan in March to “Because Cola Next is Pakistani,” emphasizing its local roots.
Cola Next’s factories cannot meet the surge in demand, Mian Zulfiqar Ahmed, the CEO of the brand’s parent company, Mezan Beverages, said in an interview. He declined to share volume figures.




Zulfiqar Ahmed, CEO of Mezan Beverages (Pvt) Ltd, that makes Cola NEXT, speaks with Reuters during an interview at his office in Karachi, Pakistan, on May 3, 2024. (REUTERS)

Restaurants, Karachi’s private schools association and university students have all taken part in anti-Coca-Cola actions, eroding goodwill built through sponsorship of Coke Studio, a popular music show in Pakistan.
Exports of Egyptian cola V7 have tripled this year compared to 2023, founder Mohamed Nour said in an interview. Nour, a former Coca-Cola executive who left the company after 28 years in 2020, said V7 was now sold in 21 countries.
Sales in Egypt, where the product has only been available since July 2023, were up 40 percent, Nour said.
Paul Musgrave, an associate professor of government at Georgetown University in Qatar, warned of long-term damage to consumer loyalty due to boycotts. “If you break habits, it’s going to be harder to win you back in the long run,” he said, without giving an estimate of the financial cost to the companies.
BANGLADESH BACKFIRE
In Bangladesh, Coke launched advertising showing a shopkeeper talking about the company’s operations in Palestine.
After a public outcry over perceived insensitivity, Coke pulled the ad in June and apologized. In response to a question from Reuters, the company said the campaign “missed the mark.”
The ad made the boycott worse, said one Bangladeshi advertising executive, who declined to be named because he was not authorized to speak to the media. Other American brands seen as symbols of Western culture, such as McDonalds and Starbucks, also face anti-Israel boycotts.
Market share for global brands fell 4 percent in the first half of 2024 in the Middle East, according to NielsenIQ. But the protests have been more visible against the widely-available sodas.
As well as boycotts, inflation and economic turmoil in Pakistan, Egypt and Bangladesh eroded consumers’ buying power even before the war, making cheaper local brands more appealing.
Last year, Coke’s market share in the consumer sector in Pakistan fell to 5.7 percent from 6.3 percent in 2022, according to GlobalData, while Pepsi’s fell to 10.4 percent from 10.8 percent.
FUTURE PLANS
Coca-Cola and its bottlers, and PepsiCo, still see the countries as important areas for growth, particularly as Western markets slow down.
Despite the boycotts, Coke invested another $22 million upgrading technology in Pakistan in April, it said in a press release at the time.
Coca-Cola’s bottler in Pakistan said to investors in May that it remained “positive about the opportunity” the world’s fifth most-populous country offers, and that it invested in the market with a long-term commitment.
In recent weeks, PepsiCo. reintroduced a brand called Teem soda, traditionally lemon-lime flavored, in Pakistani market, a spokesperson confirmed. The product is now available in a cola flavor with “Made in Pakistan” printed prominently on the label.




A view of a passenger bus with an advertisement of TEEM soft drink moves along a road in Karachi, Pakistan on September 1, 2024. (REUTERS)

The companies are also still injecting the Coke and Pepsi brands into the fabric of local communities by sponsoring charities, musicians and cricket teams.
Those moves are key to Coke and Pepsi keeping a toehold in the countries long-term even as they face setbacks now, Georgetown’s Musgrave said.
“Anything you can do to make yourself an ally or presence, a part of a community,” helps, he said.


Pakistan, Afghanistan agree to enhance trade and connectivity in push to reset ties

Pakistan, Afghanistan agree to enhance trade and connectivity in push to reset ties
Updated 16 sec ago
Follow

Pakistan, Afghanistan agree to enhance trade and connectivity in push to reset ties

Pakistan, Afghanistan agree to enhance trade and connectivity in push to reset ties
  • Ties with Kabul have been strained over a spike in militancy and a deportation drive against Afghan nations
  • Pakistani deputy PM and special envoy to Kabul visited Islamabad last week in an attempt to resolve issues

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan and Afghanistan have agreed to enhance trade and connectivity during a visit to Kabul by top officials from Islamabad, the foreign office said on Friday, amid a push by the two neighbors to reset soured relations.
Pakistan-Afghanistan relations have been strained by a spike in militancy in Pakistan’s western regions that border Afghanistan, following the Taliban’s takeover of Kabul in 2021. Islamabad says anti-Pakistan militants carry out cross-border attacks using safe havens in Afghanistan, a charge Kabul denies.
Another source of tension has been Pakistan’s decision to expel undocumented Afghans and those who had temporary permission to stay, saying it can no longer cope. Since November 2023 when Islamabad first launched the deportation drive against illegal foreigners, over 900,000 Afghans have left the country. The Afghan government has condemned the “unilateral measures” to forcibly deport tens of thousands of Afghans. Afghans have also reported weeks of arbitrary arrests, extortion and harassment by authorities as Islamabad has accelerated the deportation drive since April, a charge officials deny.
Amid these tensions, Pakistani Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Dar and special envoy to Kabul, Ambassador Mohammad Sadiq, went to Afghanistan on a one-day visit last week widely seen as an attempt to resolve outstanding issues of contention.
“During the visit, the deputy prime minister [and] foreign minister held meetings with the acting Afghan prime minister, acting Afghan deputy prime minister and acting Afghan foreign minister,” Shafqat Ali Khan, a Pakistani foreign office spokesperson, told reporters at a weekly news briefing in Islamabad.
“Both sides held extensive discussions on a range of issues including peace and security, people-to-people contacts and agreed to enhance bilateral trade and economic cooperation to the mutual benefit of people of both countries.”
Pakistan remains at loggerheads with two of its main neighbors, India and Afghanistan, while Islamabad’s relations with Iran have also seen friction in recent weeks over the killing of eight Pakistani laborers in Iran’s Sistan-Baluchestan province. Both Pakistan and Iran last year exchanged strikes against what they called militant hideouts, but quickly moved to de-escalate tensions.
This week, an attack on tourists in India’s Himalayan territory of Kashmir has sparked a new crisis between nuclear armed neighbors India and Pakistan, with New Delhi blaming militants with “cross-border linkages” for the killings, which Islamabad denies. Both nations have announced tit-for-tat measures to downgrade ties in the aftermath of the violence.
The tensions have come as Pakistan navigates a tricky path to economic recovery, seeking to boost trade by enhancing connectivity with regional countries and attract foreign investment from allies in the region and beyond.
In this regard, Dar on Thursday held a telephonic conversation with Uzbekistan Foreign Minister Seyedov Bakhtiar Odilovic and apprised him of his discussions with Afghan officials about a tri-nation railway line project involving Uzbekistan, Pakistan and Afghanistan.
“The deputy prime minister shared his discussions in Kabul regarding Uzbekistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan railway line project and hoped that the three countries would soon sign the framework agreement for this important regional connectivity project,” the foreign office spokesman said at the briefing.
The project is part of Pakistan’s efforts to position itself as a key trade and transit hub, connecting the landlocked Central Asian states to the global market.


‘Out of the question’ Pakistan’s Nadeem will attend Bengaluru meet, Indian javelin hero Chopra says

‘Out of the question’ Pakistan’s Nadeem will attend Bengaluru meet, Indian javelin hero Chopra says
Updated 25 April 2025
Follow

‘Out of the question’ Pakistan’s Nadeem will attend Bengaluru meet, Indian javelin hero Chopra says

‘Out of the question’ Pakistan’s Nadeem will attend Bengaluru meet, Indian javelin hero Chopra says
  • Chopra had earlier announced world’s top throwers, including Olympian Nadeem, had been invited to first Neeraj Chopra Classic on May 24
  • Tuesday’s attack in Kashmir prompted heavy criticism of Chopra’s decision to invite Nadeem even though he was unlikely to attend

NEW DELHI: India’s Olympic javelin gold medalist Neeraj Chopra said it was now “completely out of the question” that rival Arshad Nadeem of Pakistan will attend his meet in Bengaluru next month following Tuesday’s deadly militant attack in Indian-administered Kashmir.
Relations between nuclear-armed neighbors India and Pakistan have plummeted to their lowest level in years after the killing of 26 tourists on Wednesday.
A day before the attack, Chopra had announced that the world’s top throwers, including Paris Olympics champion Nadeem, had been invited to the first Neeraj Chopra Classic on May 24, an event he hoped would pave the way for a Diamond League meet in India one day.
However, the attack in Kashmir prompted heavy criticism of Chopra’s decision to invite Nadeem, even though it was unlikely the Pakistan thrower was going to attend.

“There has been so much talk about my decision to invite Arshad Nadeem to compete in the Neeraj Chopra Classic, and most of it has been hate and abuse,” Chopra, who won gold in Tokyo and silver in Paris, said in a social media post on Friday.
“The invitation I extended to Arshad was from one athlete to another — nothing more, nothing less. The aim of the NC Classic was to bring the best athletes to India and for our country to be the home of world-class sporting events.
“After all that has taken place over the last 48 hours, Arshad’s presence at the NC Classic was completely out of the question.”
Media reports said Nadeem, Pakistan’s first individual Olympic gold medalist, had opted not to attend the Bengaluru meet, which clashed with his training schedule for the Asian Championships in South Korea next month.
The soured relations between the two countries also spilled over to the sports world earlier this year when India’s cricket team refused to travel to Pakistan for the Champions Trophy and played all their matches, including the March 9 final, in Dubai.


Islamabad says army ‘fully prepared’ as Indian and Pakistani troops exchange fire in Kashmir

Islamabad says army ‘fully prepared’ as Indian and Pakistani troops exchange fire in Kashmir
Updated 48 min 46 sec ago
Follow

Islamabad says army ‘fully prepared’ as Indian and Pakistani troops exchange fire in Kashmir

Islamabad says army ‘fully prepared’ as Indian and Pakistani troops exchange fire in Kashmir
  • India accuses Pakistan of involvement after attack in Indian-administered Kashmir, Islamabad calls charges “devoid of rationality”
  • There is growing concern since Tuesday’s attack that India could conduct military strikes in Pakistani territory as it did in 2019

ISLAMABAD: Pakistani Foreign Office Spokesman Shafqat Ali Khan said on Thursday the country’s armed forces were “fully prepared” to defend its sovereignty as troops from Pakistan and India exchanged fire overnight across the Line of Control in disputed Kashmir.
Relations have plunged to their lowest level in years, with India accusing Pakistan of supporting “cross-border terrorism” after gunmen carried out the worst attack on civilians in Indian-administered Kashmir for a quarter of a century. Pakistan has rejected India’s accusations as being “devoid of rationality,” saying they were made without any “credible investigation” or “verifiable evidence.”
Both nations have since announced tit-for-tat measures, including closing the only open land border they share, and suspending special South Asian visas that enabled people to travel between them. They have declared each other’s defense advisers in missions in New Delhi and Islamabad persona non grata and reduced the strength of their embassies.
India has also suspended a critical treaty that regulated the sharing of water from the Indus River and its tributaries, with Pakistan warning that any attempt to stop or divert its water would be considered an act of war and met with “full force.” Pakistan has paused all bilateral agreements, suspended all trade with India, including to and from any third country and closed its airspace to all Indian-owned and Indian-operated airlines.

Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif chairs a meeting of the National Security Committee in Islamabad, Pakistan on April 24, 2025. (PID)

“The National Security Committee underscored that Pakistan, its armed forces, remain fully capable and prepared to defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity against any misadventure,” the foreign office spokesman told a weekly news briefing, referring to Thursday’s meeting of top Pakistani military and civilian officials to finalize Islamabad’s response to India’s accusations and escalatory actions. 
“The Pakistani nation remains committed to peace, but will never allow anyone to transgress its sovereignty, security, dignity and their inalienable rights.”

Pakistani security personnel stand guard at the diplomatic enclave near the Indian High Commission in Islamabad on April 24, 2025, during an anti-India protest. (AFP)

There is growing concern since Tuesday’s attack that India could conduct a military strike in Pakistani territory as it did in 2019 in retaliation for a suicide bombing in Pulwama in Indian-administered Kashmir in which at least 40 Indian paramilitary police were killed. Pakistan had denied official complicity in that assault. Several leaders of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party have also variously called for military action against Pakistan this week. 
Speaking to an international media outlet on Thursday evening, Pakistani Defense Minister Khawaja Muhammad Asif said Islamabad would respond “in kind and with full force” to any Indian incursion on the pretext of Tuesday’s militant attack.

People shout slogans during an anti-India protest in Karachi on April 24, 2025. (AFP)

Meanwhile, Syed Ashfaq Gilani, a government official in Pakistan-administered Kashmir known as Azad Kashmir, told AFP Friday that troops exchanged fire along the Line of Control (LOC), which runs 742km (460 miles), dividing Indian- and Pakistan-controlled Kashmir, and acts as part of the de facto border between the two countries. The military frontline, which runs through inhospitable terrain, has separated hundreds of families and even divided villages and mountains.
“There was no firing on the civilian population,” Gilani added.
India’s army confirmed there had been limited firing of small arms that it said had been “initiated by Pakistan,” adding it had been “effectively responded to.”

People carry baggage as they travel toward the Attari-Wagah border crossing on the India-Pakistan border, near Amritsar, India, April 25, 2025. (REUTERS)

India’s army chief is expected to review security arrangements on Friday and visit the site in the Pahalgam area of Tuesday’s attack, Reuters reported on Friday, quoting army sources. 
The two countries both claim Muslim-majority Kashmir in full but rule it in part. India, a Hindu majority nation, has long accused Muslim-majority Pakistan of aiding separatists who have battled security forces in its part of the territory — accusations Islamabad denies.


Pakistan to respond to any Indian incursion ‘in kind,’ defense minister says

Pakistan to respond to any Indian incursion ‘in kind,’ defense minister says
Updated 25 April 2025
Follow

Pakistan to respond to any Indian incursion ‘in kind,’ defense minister says

Pakistan to respond to any Indian incursion ‘in kind,’ defense minister says
  • The statement comes after an attack in Indian-administered Kashmir’s Pahalgam which has brought India, Pakistan to the brink of another war
  • Pakistan Defense Minister Khawaja Asif says they strongly suspect the Pahalgam attack, which killed 26 tourists, to be a ‘false-flag operation’

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan Defense Minister Khawaja Muhammad Asif has said that Islamabad will respond “in kind” to any Indian incursion on the pretext of a militant attack in Indian-administered Kashmir that killed over two dozen tourists this week.
India has said there were Pakistani elements in Tuesday’s attack, when militants shot dead 26 men in a meadow in the Pahalgam area. Islamabad has denied any involvement and described Indian allegations as “frivolous.”
The nuclear-armed nations have unleashed a raft of measures against each other, with India keeping a critical river water-sharing treaty in abeyance and Pakistan closing its airspace to Indian airlines, among other steps.
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Thursday vowed to chase the perpetrators of the Pahalgam attack to “the ends of the earth” after Indian police identified two of the three fugitive gunmen as Pakistani. India has not shared any proof to support its claims.
“If there is incursion from Indian side, Pakistan will meet that incursion in kind and [with] full force,” Asif said in an international media interview shared on Friday.
“We cannot allow this incursion of our soil, of our country. This is something which is very fundamental for the Pakistanis.”
Both Pakistan and India claim Muslim-majority Kashmir in full but rule it in part and have fought two of their three wars over the disputed region. India has long accused Pakistan of aiding separatists who have battled security forces in the part of the territory it controls, accusations Islamabad denies.
Since Tuesday’s attack, there have been calls for and fears that India could conduct a military strike in Pakistani territory as it did in 2019 in retaliation for a suicide bombing in Pulwama in Indian-administered Kashmir that killed at least 40 Indian paramilitary police. Several leaders of Modi’s Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party have called for military action against Pakistan.
Last week, Pakistan’s Army Chief General Asim Munir also voiced his support for the Kashmiri people, reiterating that Kashmir is the "jugular vein" of Pakistan.
“Our stance on Kashmir is absolutely clear. It was our jugular vein and it is our jugular vein,” he said at a convention of Overseas Pakistanis. "We will not forget it and we will not leave our Kashmiri brethren in their heroic struggle against the Indian occupation."
Indian officials and media have also criticized recent comments by the Pakistan army chief in support of Kashmiris’ right to self-determination, and linked it with the Pahalgam attack.
Asif said there was “absolutely no linkage” between Gen. Munir’s remarks and what happened in Pahalgam, adding that they suspected Tuesday’s attack to be a “false-flag operation.”
“There is absolutely no linkage. We make these speeches and, sort of, reiterate our commitment to Kashmir, which is a very fundamental commitment. It is something which goes with our existence as a state,” he said.
“We suspect, very strongly suspect, this was a false-flag operation and Pulwama, the last time, you are talking about 2019, ultimately proved to be a hoax. It was admitted by the India media that it was a hoax created or orchestrated to, you know, blame Pakistan for something which was never connected to Pakistan, and ultimately they were humiliated.”
As both India and Pakistan teeter on the brink of another conflict, there have been calls by the United Nations (UN) for both nuclear-armed rivals to show “maximum restraint,” while the United States (US) has said it is “closely” monitoring the situation.


US says ‘closely’ monitoring situation after attack on tourists in Kashmir

US says ‘closely’ monitoring situation after attack on tourists in Kashmir
Updated 25 April 2025
Follow

US says ‘closely’ monitoring situation after attack on tourists in Kashmir

US says ‘closely’ monitoring situation after attack on tourists in Kashmir
  • The attack in Pahalgam, which killed 26 people, has once again brought India and Pakistan to the brink of another war
  • The UN has urged both nations to show ‘maximum restraint’ as the nuclear-armed rivals announced tit-for-tat measures

ISLAMABAD: The United States (US) is “closely” monitoring the situation after an attack on tourists in Indian-administered Kashmir, the State Department said on Thursday, as both India and Pakistan teeter on the brink of another conflict.
India and Pakistan have come close to a war as the two nuclear-armed South Asian neighbors downgraded diplomatic and trade relations, closed the main border crossing and revoked visas for each other’s nationals in tit-for-tat moves this week.
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has vowed to pursue and punish the gunmen responsible for killing 26 civilians in the tourist hotspot of Pahalgam on Tuesday, accusing Pakistan of supporting “cross-border terrorism.” Pakistan has denied it was behind the attack, claimed by a previously unknown militant group.
“As we all know, it’s a rapidly changing situation and we are monitoring it closely,” State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce said during a press briefing.
The statement came after Modi vowed to hunt down the gunmen responsible for killing 26 civilians in Pahalgam and the Indian police identified two of the three fugitive gunmen as Pakistani.
“I say to the whole world: India will identify, track and punish every terrorist and their backer,” Modi said, in his first speech since Tuesday’s attack in the Himalayan region. “We will pursue them to the ends of the Earth.”
Islamabad has called the attempts to link Pakistan to the Pahalgam attack “frivolous” and vowed to respond to any Indian action.
“Any threat to Pakistan’s sovereignty and to the security of its people will be met with firm reciprocal measures in all domains,” a Pakistani government statement said.
Kashmir has been divided between India and Pakistan since their independence in 1947, with both claiming the territory in full but governing separate portions of it. The Muslim-majority region has been the cause of two of their three wars and also witnessed a bloody insurgency against Indian rule.
Bruce, however, declined to comment on the status of the disputed region.
“We, of course, are not now taking a position on the status of Kashmir or of Jammu either,” she said.
Also on Thursday, the United Nations urged both India and Pakistan to show “maximum restraint” as the nuclear-armed rivals imposed tit-for-tat diplomatic measures.