Brazil, Colombia — but not US — favor fresh Venezuela elections

Brazil, Colombia — but not US — favor fresh Venezuela elections
Venezuelans living in Colombia take part in a protest against Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro's disputed victory in Venezuela's presidential elections during a rally in Medellin, Colombia, on August 7, 2024. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 16 August 2024
Follow

Brazil, Colombia — but not US — favor fresh Venezuela elections

Brazil, Colombia — but not US — favor fresh Venezuela elections

CARACAS: The presidents of Brazil and Colombia called Thursday for fresh elections in Venezuela after international condemnation of last month’s vote that the opposition says was stolen by strongman Nicolas Maduro.

From Washington, US President Joe Biden signalled he was also calling for a new vote, but hours later the White House walked back his comment.

The two South American leaders, who spoke on the phone Wednesday to discuss a possible “political exit” from Venezuela’s post-election crisis, independently urged Maduro to consider a new election.

But Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado said it would show “a lack of respect” for the popular will already expressed on July 28.

If Maduro “is sensible,” said Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, “he could try to appeal to the people of Venezuela, perhaps even organize elections.”

Lula told a Brazilian radio station there should be “criteria for participation of all candidates” in a new election, which should “allow observers from all over the world.”

For his part, Colombian President Gustavo Petro called on X for the lifting of all sanctions against Caracas, a “general national and international amnesty,” “new, free elections” and a “transitional cohabitation government.”

Biden meanwhile addressed the issue Thursday. Asked by a reporter whether he supported the idea of fresh Venezuelan elections, the US leader replied: “I do.”

But the White House suggested Biden meant something more general.

“The president was speaking to the absurdity of Maduro and his representatives not coming clean about the July 28 elections,” a spokesman said, adding it was “abundantly clear” that opposition candidate Edmundo Gonzalez Urrutia had won.

“The United States again calls for the will of the Venezuelan people to be respected and for discussions to begin on a transition back to democratic norms,” a National Security Council spokesman said.

Machado, who was replaced on the ballot by a proxy after being barred from seeking election by Maduro-friendly state institutions, told a virtual press conference that “to ignore what happened on July 28 shows a lack of respect for Venezuelans” who voted “in very adverse conditions where there was fraud and we still managed to win.”

Venezuela’s CNE electoral council proclaimed Maduro the winner of a third, six-year term, giving him 52 percent of votes cast but without providing a detailed breakdown of the results.

The opposition says polling station-level results show its candidate Gonzalez Urrutia, a 74-year-old retired diplomat, defeated Maduro by a wide margin.

Gonzalez Urrutia himself reaffirmed Thursday on X that he had won the election “by an overwhelming majority,” and that “we reiterate our commitment to democracy.”

Gonzalez Urrutia and Machado have been in hiding since the president accused them of seeking to foment a “coup d’etat” and demanded they be jailed.

Anti-Maduro protests have claimed 25 lives so far, with dozens injured and more than 2,400 arrested.

Maduro’s victory claim has been rejected by the United States, European Union and several Latin American countries.

Mexico’s President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, meanwhile, insisted Thursday the dispute was “up to the Venezuelans to resolve.”

Maduro has rejected the possibility of new elections and asked the country’s highest court, also viewed as loyal to him, to certify the outcome.

Meanwhile, Venezuela’s legislature on Thursday approved a law to regulate the registration and funding of NGOs described by Maduro’s regime as a “facade for the financing of terrorist actions.”

The law is part of several under consideration in the regime-friendly National Assembly that critics say are meant to criminalize opponents of the strongman.

National Assembly president Jorge Rodriguez has indicated he would also seek to ban future election observation missions from foreign countries.

The vast majority of the 277 lawmakers in the single-chamber National Assembly are loyal to Maduro, who had warned of a “bloodbath” if he lost his reelection bid.

United Nations human rights chief Volker Turk and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights have urged lawmakers not to pass laws they said would limit democratic freedoms.

Since coming to power in 2013, Maduro has presided over an economic collapse that has seen more than seven million Venezuelans flee the country, as GDP plunged 80 percent in a decade.


Kremlin says it pays close attention to Trump statements after he voices disappointment with Putin call

Kremlin says it pays close attention to Trump statements after he voices disappointment with Putin call
Updated 10 sec ago
Follow

Kremlin says it pays close attention to Trump statements after he voices disappointment with Putin call

Kremlin says it pays close attention to Trump statements after he voices disappointment with Putin call
  • Kremlin leader had told Trump that Russia expects to agree a date for a third round of peace talks with Ukraine
  • Russia would prefer to achieve its goals in Ukraine by political and diplomatic means

MOSCOW: The Kremlin said on Friday that Russia closely follows all of Donald Trump’s statements after the US president said he was “very disappointed” with his latest conversation with Russian President Vladimir Putin about the war in Ukraine.

Trump, who had confidently stated last week that Putin was “looking to settle” the conflict, said after Thursday’s phone call that he did not think the Russian leader was looking to stop it.

Asked about the comments, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters: “Of course, we are paying very close attention to all of President Trump’s statements.”

He did not address Trump’s implied criticism of Putin.

Trump, who returned to the White House in January with a promise to swiftly end the “bloodbath” in Ukraine, said after Thursday’s call: “I didn’t make any progress with him at all.”

Peskov said Putin had told Trump that Russia would prefer to achieve its goals in Ukraine by political and diplomatic means, but in the meantime would continue what it calls its “special military operation.”

He said the Kremlin leader had told Trump that Russia expects to agree a date for a third round of peace talks with Ukraine, following earlier talks in May and June.


At least five dead in Pakistan building collapse: police

At least five dead in Pakistan building collapse: police
Updated 04 July 2025
Follow

At least five dead in Pakistan building collapse: police

At least five dead in Pakistan building collapse: police
  • Up to 100 people had been living in the building
  • Roof and building collapses are common across Pakistan

KARACHI: A five-story building collapse in Pakistan on Friday killed at least five people and left six injured, with more victims trapped under the rubble, police said.

Rescuers and residents in the mega port city of Karachi worked together to pull people from the debris after the incident at around 10:10 a.m. (0510 GMT).

“We have so far retrieved five dead bodies and six injured people,” a senior local police official, Arif Aziz, said.

Up to 100 people had been living in the building, he added.

Saad Edhi, of the Edhi welfare foundation that is leading the rescue operation, said there could be “at least eight to 10 more people still trapped,” describing it as a “worn out building.”

He put the death toll at four.

Roof and building collapses are common across Pakistan, mainly because of poor safety standards and shoddy construction materials in the South Asian country of more than 240 million people.

But Karachi, home to more than 20 million, is especially notorious for poor construction, illegal extensions, aging infrastructure, overcrowding, and lax enforcement of building regulations.


After decades of service, Taiwan retires its last F-5 fighter jets

After decades of service, Taiwan retires its last F-5 fighter jets
Updated 04 July 2025
Follow

After decades of service, Taiwan retires its last F-5 fighter jets

After decades of service, Taiwan retires its last F-5 fighter jets
  • To keep pace with increased threats from mainland China, Taiwan has been upgrading both its manned and unmanned aerial assets

HUALIEN, Taiwan: After decades in service, Taiwan’s Vietnam-era F-5 fighter jets are being retired as part of the island democracy’s transition to more advanced hardware.

To keep pace with increased threats from mainland China, Taiwan has been upgrading both its manned and unmanned aerial assets, including purchasing 66 of the latest generation F-16V fighters and upgrading existing aircraft to modern specifications.

China claims the island as its own territory and has never dropped its threat to invade since the sides split amid civil war in 1949.

The air force invited journalists on Friday to witness one last flyby by the F-5, which first entered service with Taiwan in 1965 and most of which have now been converted to trainers, reconnaissance planes or decoys.

The planes began moving into a backing role 30 years ago when Taiwan began acquiring more modern American F-16s, French Mirage 2000s and domestically developed Ching Kuos.

The F-5 is one of the world’s most widely produced jets, with Taiwan the largest operator at one point with 336, producing some 100 domestically. Dozens of countries still use them, including the US, which uses them as pretend opponents in training exercises.

The planes gained favor for their high speed and maneuverability, alongside their low cost and ease of maintenance. For Taiwan, they guarded the skies above the Taiwan Strait against mainland China’s Soviet and domestically built fighters.

Taiwan’s F-5s were based along the eastern coast, separated from China by both the 160 kilometer (100 mile)-wide Taiwan Strait and Taiwan’s formidable Central Mountain Range.


Rio to host BRICS summit wary of Trump

Rio to host BRICS summit wary of Trump
Updated 04 July 2025
Follow

Rio to host BRICS summit wary of Trump

Rio to host BRICS summit wary of Trump
  • The city, with beefed-up security, will play host to leaders and diplomats from 11 emerging economies
  • Tensions in the Middle East, including Israel’s ongoing war in Gaza, will weigh on the summit

RIO DE JANEIRO, Brazil: A summit of BRICS nations will convene in Rio de Janeiro on Sunday and Monday, with members hoping to weigh in on global crises while tiptoeing around US President Donald Trump’s policies.

The city, with beefed-up security, will play host to leaders and diplomats from 11 emerging economies including China, India, Russia and South Africa, which represent nearly half of the world’s population and 40 percent of its GDP.

Brazil’s left-wing President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva will have to navigate the absence of Chinese President Xi Jinping, who will miss the summit for the first time.

Beijing will instead be represented by its Prime Minister Li Qiang.

Russian leader Vladimir Putin, who is facing a pending International Criminal Court (ICC) arrest warrant, will not travel to Brazil, but is set to participate via video link, according to the Kremlin.

Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian, fresh from a 12-day conflict with Israel and a skirmish with the United States, will also be absent, as will his Egyptian counterpart Abdel Fattah El-Sisi, a Brazilian government source said.

Tensions in the Middle East, including Israel’s ongoing war in Gaza, will weigh on the summit, as well as the grim anticipation of tariffs threatened by Trump due next week.

“We’re anticipating a summit with a cautious tone: it will be difficult to mention the United States by name in the final declaration,” Marta Fernandez, director of the BRICS Policy Center at Rio’s Pontifical Catholic University said.

China, for example, “is trying to adopt a restrained position on the Middle East,” Fernandez said, pointing out that Beijing was also in tricky tariff negotiations with Washington.

“This doesn’t seem to be the right time to provoke further friction” between the world’s two leading economies, the researcher said.

BRICS members did not issue a strong statement on the Iran-Israel conflict and subsequent US military strikes due to their “diverging” interests, according to Oliver Stuenkel, an international relations professor at the Getulio Vargas Foundation.

Brazil nevertheless hopes that countries can take a common stand at the summit, including on the most sensitive issues.

“BRICS (countries), throughout their history, have managed to speak with one voice on major international issues, and there’s no reason why that shouldn’t be the case this time on the subject of the Middle East,” Brazil’s Foreign Minister Mauro Vieira said.

However, talks on finding an alternative to the dollar for trade between BRICS members are likely dead in the water.

For Fernandez, it is almost “forbidden” to mention the idea within the group since Trump threatened to impose 100 percent tariffs on countries that challenge the dollar’s international dominance.

Brazil, which in 2030 will host the COP30 UN climate conference, also hopes to find unity on the fight against climate change.

Artificial intelligence and global governance reform will also be on the menu.

“The escalation of the Middle East conflict reinforces the urgency of the debate on the need to reform global governance and strengthen multilateralism,” said foreign minister Vieira.

Since 2023, Egypt, the United Arab Emirates, Ethiopia, Iran and Indonesia have joined the BRICS, formed in 2009 as a counter-balance to leading Western economies.

But, as Fernandez points out, this expansion “makes it all the more difficult to build a strong consensus.”


A bill setting new limits on asylum-seekers passes in the Dutch parliament

A bill setting new limits on asylum-seekers passes in the Dutch parliament
Updated 04 July 2025
Follow

A bill setting new limits on asylum-seekers passes in the Dutch parliament

A bill setting new limits on asylum-seekers passes in the Dutch parliament
  • The Dutch Red Cross has estimated 23,000 to 58,000 people live in the Netherlands without an official right to residence

THE HAGUE, Netherlands: A pair of bills cracking down on asylum-seekers wishing to settle in the Netherlands has passed in the Dutch parliament after wrangling and soul-searching by some lawmakers who feared the law would criminalize offering compassionate help to undocumented migrants.

The legislation cuts temporary asylum residency from five to three years, indefinitely suspends the issuance of new asylum residency permits and reins in family reunions for people who have been granted asylum. It passed in the lower house late Thursday evening but could still be rejected in the upper house.

The Dutch Red Cross has estimated 23,000 to 58,000 people live in the Netherlands without an official right to residence.

Taking tough measures to rein in migration was a policy cornerstone for the four-party coalition led by the Party for Freedom of anti-Islam lawmaker Geert Wilders. The coalition collapsed last month after just 11 months in office, and migration is expected to be a key issue ahead of the snap election Oct. 29.

Wilders pulled the plug on the coalition saying it was taking too long to enact moves to rein in migration. His coalition partners rejected the criticism, saying they all backed the crackdown. His party currently holds a narrow lead in opinion polls over a center-left two-party bloc that recently agreed to a formal merger.

The opposition Christian Democrats withdrew their support for the legislation put to the vote Thursday over a late amendment that would criminalize people living in the Netherlands without a valid visa or asylum ruling — and would also criminalize people and organizations that help such undocumented migrants. The amendment was introduced by a member of Wilders’ party and passed narrowly because a small number of opposition lawmakers were not present for the vote.

The vote took place in the final session of parliament before lawmakers broke for the summer. The upper house will consider the legislation after it returns from the recess. If Christian Democrats in the upper chamber reject it, the legislation will be returned to the lower house.