Philippine ex-president Duterte wins mayoral election from ICC detention

Special Philippine ex-president Duterte wins mayoral election from ICC detention
Philippines’ former president Rodrigo Duterte’s supporters gather for a prayer rally in Manila on March 15, 2025. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 24 sec ago
Follow

Philippine ex-president Duterte wins mayoral election from ICC detention

Philippine ex-president Duterte wins mayoral election from ICC detention
  • Duterte was mayor of Davao for more than 20 years before becoming president
  • Local residents credit him with creating a peaceful, safe and livable city 

MANILA: Former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte has won the mayoral election in his home city by a landslide, poll results showed on Tuesday, despite his detention at the International Criminal Court on charges of crimes against humanity.

Duterte won another term as mayor of Davao City with more than 662,000 votes, which is about 85 percent of the total and eight times more than his closest rival. 

In ICC custody since March, Duterte is awaiting trial over the “war on drugs” campaign during his time as president in 2016-22, which the court estimates resulted in the extrajudicial killings of 30,000 Filipinos.

But even from a jail cell halfway across the world, his legacy as mayor of Davao for more than two decades before becoming president lives on, enough for his supporters to show up in masses at the polls. 

“He is the father figure for most Davaoenos (people of Davao). He is largely credited for the peace and order in the city, which is far better than anywhere else,” Davao resident and former journalist Allan Afdal Dawal told Arab News. 

“Things worked and people can walk in the busy streets without being pickpocketed or robbed. For example, Agdao was a gangland until the ’90s. Now it’s a bustling commercial district,” he said. “As for his ICC case, most people believed he would eventually be exonerated as the charges were seen as trumped up.” 

Under Philippine law, candidates facing criminal charges, including those in detention, can run for office, unless they have been convicted and have exhausted all appeals. 

Duterte, 80, first became mayor of Davao in 1988, at a time when the city was plagued by violence, insurgency and gang warfare. 

“Davao’s peace and order situation in the ’80s was unimaginable. When PRRD (President Rodrigo Roa Duterte) took over, it was a miraculous 360-degree turn. He ruled with an iron fist but made Davaoenos feel safer,” Davao native Jojie told Arab News. 

Davao, the third most-populated city in the Philippines, has since topped global lists of safest and most livable cities across Asia. 

In Duterte, the people of Davao remember a leader who is approachable and relatable. 

“He’s very different from the typical politician who’s like ‘high and mighty’ or usually has a lot of bodyguards … So many of the people here felt that finally, there’s someone who is ‘one of them,’” business owner May Ann told Arab News. 

People often saw him in public spaces, including driving a taxi around the city. Interacting with Duterte, who locals call Digong, was a normal occurrence that made people “feel like they know him personally and have a close connection with him,” she added. 

“I used to volunteer at a halfway home for children with cancer, and he would always be there on Survivors’ Day. Even though I knew about the EJKs (extrajudicial killings), many of us overlooked it because of what he had done for the city.”

Duterte’s deadly anti-drugs campaign has been the subject of international investigation for years, leading to his arrest in March. He has repeatedly defended the crackdown and denied the extrajudicial killing of alleged drug suspects, although he has also openly admitted to instructing police to kill in self-defense.

He could become the first Asian former head of state to go on trial at the ICC. But while his legal fate remains uncertain, Duterte could still take his oath as mayor despite being behind bars. 

“If I were President Duterte, I will ask ICC to be given the chance to take an oath of office as elected mayor of Davao before an official of the Philippines’ consulate to make more official his victory. Though it could be a long shot, depends on his lawyers’ arguments,” election lawyer Romy Macalintal told Arab News. 

“In his absence, the vice mayor will act as mayor ... The elected vice mayor is his son.” 


Bomb scare on plane halts operations at Belgian airport

Bomb scare on plane halts operations at Belgian airport
Updated 4 sec ago
Follow

Bomb scare on plane halts operations at Belgian airport

Bomb scare on plane halts operations at Belgian airport
A bomb threat was triggered on board an aircraft that landed at Charleroi airport
“Ryanair was informed of a security threat on flight FR6313,” the company said

BRUSESL: Operations at Belgium’s second largest airport were briefly suspended on Tuesday due to a bomb alert on a Ryanair flight from Portugal, the company running the airport and the airline said.

Shortly before 11:00 am (0900 GMT) “a bomb threat was triggered” on board an aircraft that landed at Charleroi airport, said a spokeswoman for its operator.

“A security perimeter was established around the aircraft,” the spokeswoman said.

This required the runway to be closed as authorities took over, halting operations, she added. Air traffic eventually resumed at 1:45 pm.

Charleroi, south of Brussels, is a major European hub for low-cost airline Ryanair, which said the threat concerned one of its planes.

“Ryanair was informed of a security threat on flight FR6313 from Faro to Brussels Charleroi,” the company said.

“Passengers have been disembarked and the aircraft is being prepared for return to service. We sincerely apologize to any passengers affected.”

Belgian police did not immediately reply to a request for comment.

UK export of F-35 parts to Israel unlawful, Palestinian NGO tells court

UK export of F-35 parts to Israel unlawful, Palestinian NGO tells court
Updated 5 min 38 sec ago
Follow

UK export of F-35 parts to Israel unlawful, Palestinian NGO tells court

UK export of F-35 parts to Israel unlawful, Palestinian NGO tells court

LONDON: Britain's decision to allow the export of F-35 fighter jet components to Israel, despite accepting they could be used in breach of international humanitarian law in Gaza, was unlawful, a Palestinian rights group told London's High Court on Tuesday.
Al-Haq, a group based in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, is taking legal action against Britain's Department for Business and Trade over its decision to exempt F-35 parts when it suspended some arms export licences last year.
The United Kingdom had assessed that Israel was not committed to complying with international humanitarian law, in relation to humanitarian access and the treatment of detainees, as the basis for its decision in September.
But, after the Ministry of Defence said suspending licences for F-35 parts would have an impact on international security and "undermine U.S. confidence in the UK and NATO", Britain decided to "carve out" F-35 licences.
Al-Haq, which documents alleged rights violations by Israel and the Palestinian Authority, the Palestinians' self-rule body in the West Bank, argues that the ministry's decision was unlawful as it was in breach of Britain's obligations under international law, including the Geneva Convention.
The group's lawyer, Raza Husain, said its case at the High Court was being heard "against a backdrop of human calamity unfolding in Gaza", since Israel responded to the October 7, 2023 Hamas attacks with a devastating military campaign.
Nearly 53,000 Palestinians have been killed, according to Hamas-run Gaza health authorities.
Husain said the vast majority of Al-Haq's case did not require the High Court to rule on "the lawfulness or otherwise" of Israel's actions in Gaza, but whether British ministers had misunderstood the law when it decided on the F-35 carve-out.
The British government, however, argues ministers were entitled to take "exceptional measures" to not suspend F-35 licences to avoid the potential impact on international peace and security.
Its lawyer, James Eadie, said in court filings that the decision was "consistent with the UK's domestic and international legal obligations".
Last year, a coalition of groups, including Al-Haq, asked a Dutch court to stop the Netherlands exporting weaponry to Israel and trading with Israeli settlements in occupied Palestinian territories.
Israel says it takes care to avoid harming civilians and denies committing abuses or war crimes in Gaza.
In March Israel ended a January ceasefire deal with Hamas, after the two sides could not agree on terms for extending it, and renewed its military operations.


Hundreds of ex-Daesh fighters face no prosecution in UK

More than 400 former Daesh fighters have returned to Britain without facing prosecution, a group of MPs and peers has warned.
More than 400 former Daesh fighters have returned to Britain without facing prosecution, a group of MPs and peers has warned.
Updated 13 May 2025
Follow

Hundreds of ex-Daesh fighters face no prosecution in UK

More than 400 former Daesh fighters have returned to Britain without facing prosecution, a group of MPs and peers has warned.
  • Parliamentary committee calls for urgent action to ensure they face justice
  • ‘To date, no Daesh fighters have been prosecuted for international crimes in the UK and we find this unacceptable’

LONDON: More than 400 former Daesh fighters have returned to Britain without facing prosecution, a group of MPs and peers has warned, calling for legal changes to ensure those guilty of war crimes and genocide face justice in the UK.

Hundreds of British nationals over the past decade traveled to join Daesh, which once held vast swathes of territory across Syria and Iraq.

The terror group committed campaigns of murder and rape against minority groups such as the Yazidis.

Yet of the more than 400 former members of the group who have since returned to the UK, none have been prosecuted for their crimes, the Daily Telegraph reported on Tuesday.

The parliamentary joint committee on human rights raised the alarm over the lack of justice and called on the government to take urgent measures to address the issue.

Former Daesh fighters must face justice in the UK rather than in Syria and Iraq, the committee said.

Government ministers have previously argued that Daesh members should be investigated and prosecuted under local laws in Middle Eastern countries. But the committee said this is unlikely to happen in the countries where Daesh held territory.

“Where the UK has jurisdiction over international crimes, the UK should seek to investigate and prosecute such crimes,” a report by the committee said.

However, British courts face a “key barrier” when trying to deal with cases of war crimes and genocide because the accused must be UK nationals, residents or “subject to service personnel laws.”

This can be resolved by amending the Crime and Policing Bill now making its way through Parliament, the committee said.

Lord Alton, the committee’s chairman, said: “This is not something the UK can simply wash its hands of because it happened overseas. We know that British nationals committed the most horrendous crimes in Iraq and Syria under the Daesh regime and we have a duty to see them brought to justice.

“To date, no Daesh fighters have been successfully prosecuted for international crimes in the UK and we find this unacceptable.”

As well as prosecuting former Daesh fighters, the committee called for greater government transparency over the deprivation of citizenship.

The UK on a number of occasions has stripped British nationals of their citizenship because of ties to Daesh.

The case of Shamima Begum, who traveled to join Daesh aged 15, is the most prominent example.

More must also be done to repatriate children from camps in northeast Syria, the committee said.

Lord Alton highlighted the “deplorable” conditions in the camps, where the families of former Daesh fighters are detained.

“It is in the UK’s interest to ensure they do not become a new generation of the radicalized and they must be brought home,” he added.


Russia launches smallest nighttime attack on Ukraine in months in run-up to possible peace talks

Russia launches smallest nighttime attack on Ukraine in months in run-up to possible peace talks
Updated 13 May 2025
Follow

Russia launches smallest nighttime attack on Ukraine in months in run-up to possible peace talks

Russia launches smallest nighttime attack on Ukraine in months in run-up to possible peace talks

KYIV: Russia launched 10 Shahed and decoy drones at Ukraine in nighttime attacks, the Ukrainian air force said Tuesday, in its smallest drone bombardment this year as the warring countries prepare for possible peace talks in Turkey.
The Kremlin hasn’t directly responded to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s challenge for Russian leader Vladimir Putin to meet him in person at the negotiations in Istanbul on Thursday.
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov refused for the second straight day Tuesday to tell reporters whether Putin will travel to Istanbul and who else will represent Russia at the potential talks. “As soon as the president considers it necessary, we will make an announcement,” Peskov said.
Russia has said it will send a delegation to Istanbul without preconditions.
The U.S. has been applying stiff pressure on both sides to come to the table since President Donald Trump came to power in January with a promise to end the war.
Military analysts say both sides are preparing a spring-summer campaign on the battlefield, where a war of attrition has killed tens of thousands of soldiers on both sides along the roughly 1,000-kilometer (620-mile) front line. The Institute for the Study of War, a Washington think tank, said Monday that Russia is “quickly replenishing front-line units with new recruits to maintain the battlefield initiative.”
Zelenskyy will not be meeting with any Russian officials in Istanbul other than Putin, Mykhailo Podolyak, an adviser to Zelenskyy, said Tuesday on a YouTube show run by prominent Russian journalists in exile.
Lower-level talks would amount to simply “dragging out” any peace process, Podolyak said. European leaders have recently accused Putin of dragging his feet in peace efforts while he attempts to press his bigger army’s battlefield initiative and capture more Ukrainian land.
Russia effectively rejected an unconditional 30-day ceasefire demanded by Ukraine and Western European leaders from Monday, when it fired more than 100 drones at Ukraine. Putin instead offered direct peace talks with Ukraine in Istanbul on Thursday.
Russia shunned the ceasefire proposal tabled by the U.S. and European leaders but offered direct talks with Ukraine.
Putin has repeatedly questioned the legitimacy of the Ukrainian government, especially Zelenskyy himself, saying his term expired last year. Under Ukraine’s constitution, it is illegal for the country to hold national elections while it’s under martial law, as it now is.
In a further complication, a Ukrainian decree from 2022 rules out negotiations with Putin.
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio spoke Monday with the top diplomats from the United Kingdom, France, Germany and Poland, who were meeting in London, to assess “the way forward for a ceasefire and path to peace in Ukraine,” spokesperson Tammy Bruce said.
Those European countries had pledged further sanctions on Russia if it didn’t comply with a full ceasefire that Ukraine had accepted from Monday, but they made no announcement of additional punitive measures.
 


Putin skipping talks would be 'final signal' Moscow unwilling to end war

Putin skipping talks would be 'final signal' Moscow unwilling to end war
Updated 13 May 2025
Follow

Putin skipping talks would be 'final signal' Moscow unwilling to end war

Putin skipping talks would be 'final signal' Moscow unwilling to end war

KYIV: Ukraine on Tuesday said that if Russian President Vladimir Putin skips talks in Turkey on Thursday with Volodymyr Zelensky, it would be a clear sign that Moscow does not have any intentions of halting its invasion.
Zelensky has called on Putin to personally attend direct Russia-Ukraine talks that the Kremlin leader himself suggested, but Moscow on Tuesday declined to respond to that invitation for the second day running.
"If Vladimir Putin refuses to come to Turkey, it will be the final signal that Russia does not want to end this war, that Russia is not willing and not ready for any negotiations," Zelensky's chief of staff, Andriy Yermak, said in a statement published by the Ukrainian presidency.
Putin's spokesman on Tuesday refused to say who Russia would send to Istanbul.
"The Russian side continues to prepare for the talks scheduled for Thursday. That is all we can say at this point. We do not intend to comment further at this time," spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters.
Asked if he could name Russia's negotiating team, Peskov said: "No... as soon as the president deems it necessary, we will announce it."
The meeting between Russian and Ukrainian negotiators in Turkey would be the first direct talks on the invasion between the two sides since the first months of the war.
Putin proposed negotiations in a late-night statement from the Kremlin over the weekend, a counteroffer after Kyiv and Europe urged Moscow to agree to a full and unconditional 30-day ceasefire starting Monday.