UK planned to sanction ‘extremist’ Israeli ministers before election: Cameron

Former UK Foreign Secretary David Cameron has said he planned to sanction “extremist” Israeli ministers, including asset freezes and travel bans. (AFP/File Photo)
Short Url
Updated 15 October 2024
Follow

UK planned to sanction ‘extremist’ Israeli ministers before election: Cameron

  • Ex-FM: Asset freezes, travel bans were prepared against Bezalel Smotrich, Itamar Ben-Gvir
  • Urges new Labour government to press ahead with plan but opposes arms export bans

LONDON: Former UK Foreign Secretary David Cameron has said he planned to sanction “extremist” Israeli ministers, including asset freezes and travel bans.

Cameron, who served as foreign secretary to former Prime Minister Rishi Sunak until July, told the BBC that he had been “working up” plans to sanction Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich and National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir when Sunak called a general election, which his Conservative Party lost.

Cameron urged the UK’s new Labour government to follow through with sanctions to tell Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that his government’s conduct “is not good enough and has to stop.”

Cameron told the BBC’s “Today” program that Ben-Gvir and Smotrich “said things like encouraging people to stop aid convoys going into Gaza — they have encouraged extreme settlers in the West Bank with the appalling things they’ve been carrying out.” 

Ben-Gvir had also claimed it was “justified and moral” to starve people in Gaza, and has called for the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians from their land to “make the desert bloom,” Cameron said, adding that sanctioning them would let Netanyahu know that “when (you have) ministers in your government who are extremists and behave in this way, we are prepared to use our sanctions regime.”

Cameron said the plans to sanction the pair did not proceed as it would have been “too much of a political act” for a government entering an election.

Sources in Whitehall told the BBC that the plans were “well advanced” and “ready to go,” but there were suggestions that the move could have inflamed tensions in the UK and that the US opposed sanctioning Smotrich and Ben-Gvir.

David Lammy, the UK’s current foreign secretary, has since described the duo’s rhetoric as “entirely unacceptable,” adding: “We’re very worried about escalatory behavior, about inflamed tensions.”

On the subject of sanctions, he said: “I’m absolutely clear, if we have to act, we’ll act. I’m in discussions with G7 partners, particularly European partners, on that. I’m not announcing further sanctions today but that’s kept under close review.”

Since entering office, Lammy has ordered a review into UK arms sale licenses to Israel, which led to the suspension of 30 export licenses over concerns that the equipment would be used to break international law — a move Cameron opposed.

The government also ended its opposition to the issuing of arrest warrants for prominent Israeli politicians, including Netanyahu, by the International Criminal Court.

Cameron warned that arms export bans could hinder Israel’s ability to defend itself against Iran and Hezbollah.

“I thought the government made a mistake over the arms embargo because, fundamentally, if you’re … helping to protect Israel from a state-on-state attack by Iran, but at the same time you’re withholding the export of weapons, that policy makes no sense.”

He told the BBC: “There were other things we could do to put pressure on Netanyahu and say, ‘Of course we respect your right to self-defense but we do want you to act within the law.’”

Cameron added: “We all want this conflict to end, but it has to end in a way that’s sustainable so that it doesn’t restart. That’s why it’s right to back Israel’s right of self-defense.

“But it’s not a blank check, it’s not unconditional. We do want to see aid get through to Gaza, and we do want the role of the UN in Lebanon to be respected.”

Tom Keatinge, founding director of the Centre for Finance and Security at the Royal United Services Institute, told the BBC that sanctioning Smotrich and Ben-Gvir would send a “major political message” to the Israeli government.

Keatinge said there is no precedent for Britain sanctioning politicians of an allied nation, and it would lead to “practical issues” given that other UK allies are not in agreement on the stance.


China says Hegseth is touting a Cold War mentality in calling it a threat

Updated 40 sec ago
Follow

China says Hegseth is touting a Cold War mentality in calling it a threat

  • The Chinese foreign ministry said Hegseth had vilified Beijing with defamatory allegations the previous day before at the Shangri-La Dialogue

BEJING: China on Sunday denounced US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth for calling the Asian country a threat, accusing him of touting a Cold War mentality as tensions between Washington and Beijing further escalate.
The foreign ministry said Hegseth had vilified Beijing with defamatory allegations the previous day before at the Shangri-La Dialogue, a global security conference. The statement also accused the United States of inciting conflict and confrontation in the region.
“Hegseth deliberately ignored the call for peace and development by countries in the region, and instead touted the Cold War mentality for bloc confrontation,” it said, referring to the post-World War II rivalry between the US and the former Soviet Union.
“No country in the world deserves to be called a hegemonic power other than the US itself,” it said, alleging that Washington is also undermining peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific.
Hegseth said in Singapore on Saturday that Washington will bolster its defenses overseas to counter what the Pentagon sees as rapidly developing threats by Beijing, particularly in its aggressive stance toward Taiwan.
China’s army “is rehearsing for the real deal,” Hegseth said. “We are not going to sugarcoat it — the threat China poses is real. And it could be imminent.”
The Chinese statement stressed that the Taiwan question is entirely China’s internal affair, saying the US must “never play with fire” with it. It also alleged Washington had deployed offensive weaponry in the South China Sea, was “stoking flames and creating tensions in the Asia-Pacific” and “turning the region into a powder keg.”
In a Facebook post on Saturday, China’s Embassy in Singapore said Hegseth’s speech was “steeped in provocations and instigation.”
The US and China had reached a deal last month to cut US President Donald Trump’s tariffs from 145 percent to 30 percent for 90 days, creating time for negotiators from both sides to reach a more substantive agreement. China also reduced its taxes on US goods from 125 percent to 10 percent.
But it’s uncertain if a trade war truce will last. Trump in a social media post on Friday said he would no longer be “nice” with China when it comes to trade and accused Beijing of breaking an unspecified agreement with the US
Tensions escalated anew after the US said on Wednesday it would start revoking visas for Chinese students studying there.
Separately, the Chinese Embassy in Singapore criticized attempts to link the issue of Taiwan with that of the war in Ukraine after French President Emmanuel Macron warned of a dangerous double standard in focusing on a potential conflict with China at the cost of abandoning Ukraine.
The embassy made no mention of Macron in its post on Facebook that included a photo showing the French president at the Singapore forum.
“If one tries to denounce ‘double standards’ through the lens of a double standard, the only result we can get is still double standard,” it said.
China, which usually sends its defense minister to the Shangri-La forum, this time sent a lower-level delegation led by Maj. Gen. Hu Gangfeng, the vice president of the People’s Liberation Army National Defense University.


Bangladesh top court restores Jamaat-e-Islami party

Updated 25 min 54 sec ago
Follow

Bangladesh top court restores Jamaat-e-Islami party

  • Supreme Court’s decision allows Bangladesh’s largest religio-political party to partake in elections
  • Jamaat-e-Islami supported Islamabad during Bangladesh’s 1971 war of independence against Pakistan

DHAKA: Bangladesh on Sunday restored the registration of the largest Islamist party, allowing it to take part in elections, more than a decade after it was removed under the now-overthrown government.

The Supreme Court overturned a cancelation of Jamaat-e-Islami’s registration, allowing it to be formally listed as a political party with the Election Commission.

“The Election Commission is directed to deal with the registration of that party in accordance with law,” commission lawyer Towhidul Islam told AFP.

Jamaat-e-Islami party lawyer, Shishir Monir, said the Supreme Court’s decision would allow a “democratic, inclusive and multi-party system” in the Muslim-majority country of 170 million people.

“We hope that Bangladeshis, regardless of their ethnicity or religious identity, will vote for Jamaat, and that the parliament will be vibrant with constructive debates,” Monir told journalists.

After Sheikh Hasina was ousted as prime minister in August, the party appealed for a review of the 2013 high court order banning it.

Sunday’s decision comes after the Supreme Court on May 27 overturned a conviction against a key leader of Jamaat-e-Islami, A.T.M. Azharul Islam.

Islam had been sentenced to death in 2014 for rape, murder and genocide during Bangladesh’s 1971 war of independence from Pakistan.

Jamaat-e-Islami supported Islamabad during the war, a role that still sparks anger among many Bangladeshis today.

They were rivals of Hasina’s father, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman of the Awami League, who would become Bangladesh’s founding figure.

Hasina banned Jamaat-e-Islami during her tenure and cracked down on its leaders.

In May, Bangladesh’s interim government banned the Awami League, pending the outcome of a trial over its crackdown on mass protests that prompted her ouster last year.


Death toll in Indonesian quarry rockfall rises to 18

Updated 3 sec ago
Follow

Death toll in Indonesian quarry rockfall rises to 18

  • The victims were trapped in the rubble when the Gunung Kuda quarry in Cirebon district collapsed
  • By Saturday afternoon, rescuers had retrieved 16 bodies

BANDUNG, Indonesia: The death toll from a rockfall at a limestone quarry on Indonesia’s Java island rose to 18 on Sunday, with another seven people still missing and feared dead, a military official said.

Workers and heavy equipment were buried when rocks suddenly fell at the mining site in the city of Cirebon in West Java province on Friday morning.

The rockfall also injured at least 12 people.

“Today, we retrieved one more body, which brings the total death toll to 18 people, while seven more people are still missing,” local military chief Mukhammad Yusron said.

“We suspect the missing victims have already died.”

Rescuers have deployed excavators and rescue dogs to search for the remaining victims, Mukhammad said.

He said the search operation was challenging and dangerous due to the unstable structures of the rock.

“We must pay attention to the rescuers’ safety because there have been more rockfalls during the operation.”

The local company overseeing the mine was operating legally. Still, safety standards were lacking, according to West Java governor Dedi Mulyadi, who said he had ordered its closure following the accident.

“I have issued an order to my subordinates at the site. The company has been shut down permanently,” he said in a statement earlier this week.

Friday’s incident was the second collapse at the quarry, following an incident in February but no casualties were reported then.

Mining accidents are common across the mineral-rich Southeast Asian archipelago, especially in unlicensed sites where safety protocols are often ignored.

In July last year, at least 23 people died and 35 others were missing when a landslide hit a remote village near an illegal gold mine on the central island of Sulawesi.

In 2023 eight workers died after being trapped in an illegal gold mine in Central Java.


Myanmar junta extends ceasefire again after quake

Updated 39 min 38 sec ago
Follow

Myanmar junta extends ceasefire again after quake

  • A statement from the junta information team on Saturday said there would be an extension of the armistice, which expired May 31, until June 30

YANGON: Myanmar’s junta has extended a post-earthquake truce, after the expiry of a previous humanitarian ceasefire it was accused of flouting with a continued campaign of air strikes.
The junta initially declared a truce in the many-sided civil war after a huge quake in late March killed nearly 3,800 people and left tens of thousands homeless.
The truce has been extended before, although conflict monitors say fighting has continued, including regular air strikes.
A statement from the junta information team on Saturday said there would be an extension of the armistice — which expired May 31 — until June 30.
This would “facilitate rehabilitation and reconstruction activities in earthquake-affected areas,” it said in the statement.
It added that the state was “intensively engaging in reconstruction of damaged government offices and departments, public residences and transport facilities.”
The ceasefire would also allow the country to hold “a free and fair multi-party democracy general election,” according to the statement.
The country’s junta chief said earlier this year that a long-promised election will be held by January, the first in the war-torn nation since the military staged a coup in 2021.
In the statement, the military also warned it would still strike back against any offensives by the array of ethnic armed groups and anti-coup fighters.
The announcement comes after Malaysian foreign minister Mohamad Hasan used a regional meeting last week to call for the extension and expansion of a ceasefire “beyond the currently affected zones.”
Malaysia currently holds the rotating chairmanship of the 10-country Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN).
The bloc has led so far fruitless diplomatic efforts to end Myanmar’s conflict since the junta deposed civilian leader Aung San Suu Kyi in February 2021.


Poland holds tight vote with EU role at stake

Updated 51 min 9 sec ago
Follow

Poland holds tight vote with EU role at stake

  • An exit poll is expected as soon as ballots close and election officials predict that the final result will be known on Monday
  • Presidents in Poland have the power to veto legislation and are also the commander-in-chief of the armed forces

WARSAW: Poles began voting on Sunday in a tight presidential election with major implications for the country’s role in Europe, and for abortion and LGBTQ rights.

Warsaw’s pro-EU mayor Rafal Trzaskowski, 53, an ally of the centrist government, faces off against nationalist historian Karol Nawrocki, 42, with opinion polls showing that the race was too tight to call.

Polls close at 9:00 p.m. (1900 GMT) in the EU and NATO country, which borders Ukraine and has been a key supporter of its neighbor in the war against Russia.

An exit poll is expected as soon as ballots close and election officials predict that the final result will be known on Monday.

A victory for Trzaskowski would be a major boost for the progressive agenda of the government led by Prime Minister Donald Tusk, a former European Council president.

It could mean significant social changes such as the introduction of civil partnerships for same-sex couples and an easing of the near-total ban on abortion.

Presidents in Poland, a fast-growing economy of 38 million people, have the power to veto legislation and are also the commander-in-chief of the armed forces.

Victory for Nawrocki would embolden the populist Law and Justice (PiS) party, which ruled Poland between 2015 and 2023, and could lead to fresh parliamentary elections.

Many Nawrocki supporters want stricter curbs on immigration and advocate for conservative values and more sovereignty for the country within the European Union.

“We should not give in to European pressure,” 40-year-old Agnieszka Prokopiuk, a homemaker, said ahead of the vote.

“We need to make our own way... and not succumb to trends from the West,” she said in the city of Biala Podlaska in eastern Poland near the Belarus border.

Tomasz Czublun, a 48-year-old mechanic, said: “The European Union is important but the sovereignty of our country is much more important.”

Anna Materska-Sosnowska, a politics expert, called the election “a real clash of civilizations” because of the wide policy differences between the candidates.

Many Trzaskowski voters support greater integration within the EU and an acceleration of social reforms.

Malgorzata Wojciechowska, a tour guide and teacher in her fifties, said Polish women “unfortunately do not have the same rights as our European friends.”

“I hope that Rafal Trzaskowski will relaunch the debate on abortion so that we can finally live in a free country where we can have our own opinion,” she said.

The election is also being watched closely in Ukraine, which is seeking to bolster international diplomatic support in its negotiations with Russia as its resistance to Moscow’s invasion grinds on.

Nawrocki, an admirer of US President Donald Trump, opposes NATO membership for Kyiv and has called for curbs on benefits for the estimated one million Ukrainian refugees in Poland.

He used his last campaign hours on Friday to leave flowers at a monument to Poles killed by Ukrainian nationalists during World War II.

“It was a genocide against the Polish people,” he said.

The election’s final result is expected to hinge on whether Trzaskowski can mobilize enough supporters and whether far-right voters will cast their ballots for Nawrocki.

Far-right candidates secured more than 21 percent of the vote in the election’s first round, which Trzaskowski won by a razor-thin margin of 31 percent against 30 percent for Nawrocki.