Will Arab countries follow Norway’s step and force influencers use disclaimers about filters?

Social media companies have been increasingly trying to introduce features that encourage users to post authentic content. (File/Twitter)
Short Url
Updated 15 July 2021
Follow

Will Arab countries follow Norway’s step and force influencers use disclaimers about filters?

  • Norway last week introduced new legislation requiring influencers and advertisers to declare when images they shared had been edited or retouched
  • Filters on Instagram can allow users to conceal faces, soften skin, hide blemishes, give bigger and brighter eyes, puff up lips and shrink noses

LONDON: European countries have, in recent years, been increasingly enacting social media laws that fight unrealistic beauty standards and promote body positivity at a time when influencers are dominating the beauty scene.

Whether such laws on unrealistic body images could be translated to the Arab world remains unclear, however.

Norway last week introduced new legislation requiring influencers and advertisers to declare when images they shared had been edited or retouched.

When asked if this law could be enacted in the Arab world, influencer Danae Mercer replied that the law was “interesting but complex.”

Mercer, who is based in Dubai, is an advocate for natural beauty. While she believed that such a law was a step in the right direction in the region, she said that Norway’s approach was not as straightforward as the UK’s.

“With the UK’s decision to ban filters in advertising, the approach felt more clean cut,” she said. “It’s basically saying you can’t falsely market, which isn’t allowed anywhere.”

Social media influencer, Ameni Esseibi, felt extremely positive about the law. “I personally think that this law is great news for our industry, I can’t wait for it to be applied in the UAE also. It’s time for people to see reality and to accept real life and stop living in a bubble” she said.

Esseibi, who is based in the UAE, describes herself as the first curvy model in the MENA region and is a strong advocate of body positivity. 

“People need to wake up and save the younger generation it’s already damaged by the harsh world we live in, let’s try to make easier for them at least on this and not make it harder and impossible,” she added. 

Dr. Jad Melki, an associate professor of journalism and media studies at the Lebanese American University and director of the Institute of Media Research and Training, said that disclosing whether a photo had been edited had long been an ethical standard for most professional news institutions, particularly in the US.

“Extending this to social media influencers is certainly good for improving transparency but making it law is going to be hard to enforce, especially in the Arab region,” he told Arab News.

Government agencies across the region did not respond to queries about whether their countries would enact such a law.

In early 2021, the UK’s Advertising Standards Authority issued a decision that effectively banned influencers from using unrealistic beauty filters in advertisements.

Instagram introduced augmented reality (AR) filters, or face filters, in 2017 to compete with Snapchat. Filters were initially limited to fun touches such as animal ears, nerd glasses or a butterfly crown.

But, as the app developed, Instagram began allowing users to create their own filters. However, they have to adhere to both Instagram’s community guidelines and Spark AR policies. The new filters then go through an approval process before going live in the Spark AR Effects Gallery on Instagram.

But what started with flower crowns and puppy filters has become much more complex. Filters can now allow users to conceal faces, soften skin, hide blemishes, give bigger and brighter eyes, puff up lips and shrink noses.

“Studies have shown just how much seeing online perfection is warping our sense of self,” Mercer said. “And with apps like TikTok, where filters are pretty much built in, it can become more and more difficult to be comfortable with a regular unfiltered photo.”

Research has found that Instagram use in the US, specifically exposure to filtered and idealized Instagram images, has been linked to body dissatisfaction and body negativity among women aged between 18-29.

A 2020 study on Instagram’s role in propagating unrealistic beauty standards highlighted that prominent beauty influencers had increasingly played a part in propagating unrealistic beauty standards online.

While the name of a certain filter can be displayed clearly at the top of a story, it does not necessarily mean that people have not resorted to other ways to hide the use of filters such as posting screenshots of the original filtered photo.

Norway’s newly introduced law will require influencers to put a disclaimer on any image where edits have been made to areas including body size, shape and skin, either through a retouching app like FaceTune or ‘beautifying’ face filters.

However, as Mercer noted, a potentially similar law in the Arab region would be difficult to implement.

“It opens up the question of when does it stop. Will people have to disclose if they’ve had plastic surgery that creates the same effects as filters? What about in films, where they edit and use body adjusting all the time? Or TV? What about traditional media?” 

Social media companies have been increasingly trying to introduce features that encourage users to post authentic content that reflects their real selves and to promote positive body images.

Last month Instagram and its parent company Facebook introduced a new feature that allowed users to hide the like counts on posts they shared. This feature is intended to reduce the social pressure that comes with likes.

For their part, social media influencers have started a campaign as a response to the growing unrealistic beauty standards on Instagram. The ‘Instagram vs Reality’ movement features influencers who post two images of themselves side-by-side. One is an ideal Instagram version that is perfectly lit and posed showcasing the best attributes, and the other is the realistic version that features a natural pose.

Many Instagram accounts have popped up with the sole aim of celebrating natural poses and unfiltered images.


EU bans 4 more Russian media outlets from broadcasting in the bloc, citing disinformation

Updated 18 May 2024
Follow

EU bans 4 more Russian media outlets from broadcasting in the bloc, citing disinformation

  • The EU has already suspended Russia Today and Sputnik among several other outlets since February 2022

BRUSSELS: The European Union on Friday banned four more Russian media outlets from broadcasting in the 27-nation bloc for what it calls the spread of propaganda about the invasion of Ukraine and disinformation as the EU heads into parliamentary elections in three weeks.
The latest batch of broadcasters consists of Voice of Europe, RIA Novosti, Izvestia and Rossiyskaya Gazeta, which the EU claims are all under control of the Kremlin. It said in a statement that the four are in particular targeting “European political parties, especially during election periods.”
Belgium already last month opened an investigation into suspected Russian interference in June’s Europe-wide elections, saying its country’s intelligence service has confirmed the existence of a network trying to undermine support for Ukraine.
The Czech government has imposed sanctions on a number of people after a pro-Russian influence operation was uncovered there. They are alleged to have approached members of the European Parliament and offered them money to promote Russian propaganda.
Since the war started in February 2022, the EU has already suspended Russia Today and Sputnik among several other outlets.

 

 


Israeli soldiers post abusive videos despite army’s pledge to act: BBC analysis

Updated 17 May 2024
Follow

Israeli soldiers post abusive videos despite army’s pledge to act: BBC analysis

  • The BBC analyzed 45 photos and videos posted online by Israeli soldiers that showed Palestinian prisoners in the West Bank being abused and humiliated

LONDON: Israeli soldiers continue to post videos of abuse against Palestinian detainees despite a military pledge to take action against the perpetrators, analysis by the BBC has found.

The broadcaster said it had analyzed 45 photos and videos posted online by Israeli soldiers that showed Palestinian prisoners in the West Bank being abused and humiliated. Some were draped in Israeli flags. 

Experts say the footage and images, which showed Palestinians being stripped, beaten and blindfolded, could breach international law and amount to a war crime.

The Israel Defense Forces said some soldiers had been disciplined or suspended for “unacceptable behavior” but did not comment on the individual cases identified by the BBC.

The most recent investigation into social media misconduct by Israeli soldiers follows a previous inquiry in which BBC Verify confirmed Israeli soldiers had filmed Gazan detainees while beating them and then posted the material on social platforms.

The Israeli military has carried out arbitrary arrests across Gaza and the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, since the Hamas attack on Oct. 7. The number of Palestinian prisoners in the West Bank has since risen to more than 7,060 according to the Commission of Detainees’ Affairs and the Palestinian Prisoner Society.

Ori Givati, spokesperson for Breaking the Silence, a non-governmental organization for Israeli veterans working to expose wrongdoing in the IDF, told the BBC he was “far from shocked” to hear the misconduct was ongoing.

Blaming “current far-right political rhetoric in the country” for further encouraging the abuse, he added: “There are no repercussions. They [Israeli soldiers] get encouraged and supported by the highest ministers of the government.”

He said this played into a mindset already subscribed to by the military: “The culture in the military, when it comes to Palestinians, is that they are only targets. They are not human beings. This is how the military teaches you to behave.”

The BBC’s analysis found that the videos and photos it examined were posted by 11 soldiers of the Kfir Brigade, the largest infantry brigade in the IDF. None of them hid their identity.

The IDF did not respond when the BBC asked about the actions of the individual soldiers and whether they had been disciplined.

The BBC also attempted to contact the soldiers on social media. The organization was blocked by one, while none of the others responded.

Mark Ellis, executive director of the International Bar Association, urged an investigation into the incidents shown in the footage and called for the IDF to discipline those involved.

In response to the BBC’s investigation, the IDF said: “The IDF holds its soldiers to a professional standard … and investigates when behavior is not in line with the IDF’s values. In the event of unacceptable behavior, soldiers were disciplined and even suspended from reserve duty.

“Additionally, soldiers are instructed to avoid uploading footage of operational activities to social media networks.”

However, it did not acknowledge its pledge to act on BBC Verify’s earlier findings in Gaza, according to the broadcaster.


4 journalists killed in Gaza as death toll climbs above 100

Updated 17 May 2024
Follow

4 journalists killed in Gaza as death toll climbs above 100

  • 104 Palestinian media workers reported dead, along with 3 Lebanese and 2 Israelis

LONDON: The Gaza Media Authority on Thursday said that four journalists had been killed in an Israeli airstrike, bringing the total number of journalists killed in the conflict to more than 100.

The victims were identified as Hail Al-Najjar, a video editor at the Al-Aqsa Media Network; Mahmoud Jahjouh, a photojournalist at the Palestine Post website; Moath Mustafa Al-Ghefari, a photojournalist at the Kanaan Land website and Palestinian Media Foundation; and Amina Mahmoud Hameed, a program presenter and editor at several media outlets, according to the Anadolu Agency.

The Gaza Media Office said the four were killed in an Israeli airstrike, but did not provide additional details on the circumstances surrounding their deaths.

A total of 104 Palestinian journalists have been killed since the conflict began on Oct. 7. Two Israeli and three Lebanese media workers also have been killed.

The latest loss adds to the already heavy toll on media workers, with the Committee to Protect Journalists saying the Gaza conflict is the deadliest for journalists and media workers since it began keeping records.

Israel is continuing its offensive on Gaza despite a UN Security Council resolution demanding an immediate ceasefire.

On Thursday, South Africa, which has brought a case accusing Israel of genocide to the International Court of Justice, urged the court to order Israel to halt its assault on Rafah.

According to Gaza medical authorities, more than 35,200 Palestinians have been killed, mostly women and children, and over 79,200 have been injured since early October when Israel launched its offensive following an attack by Hamas.


Russia outlaws SOTA opposition news outlet

Updated 17 May 2024
Follow

Russia outlaws SOTA opposition news outlet

  • Authorities said outlet tries to destabilize the socio-political situation in Russia
  • Move could criminalize SOTA content and puts its reporters at risk of arrest

LONDON: Russia declared opposition media outlet SOTA “undesirable” on Thursday, a move that could criminalize the sharing of its content and put its reporters at risk of arrest.
Authorities in Russia have declared dozens of news outlets, think tanks and non-profit organizations “undesirable” since 2015, a label rights groups say is designed to deter dissent.
In a statement, Russia’s Prosecutor General accused SOTA of “frank attempts to destabilize the socio-political situation in Russia” and “create tension and irritation in society.”
“Such activities, obviously encouraged by so-called Western inspirers, have the goal of undermining the spiritual and moral foundations of Russian society,” it said.
It also accused SOTA of co-operating with TV Rain and The Insider, two other independent Russian-language outlets based outside of the country that are linked to the opposition.
SOTA Project, which covers opposition protests and has been fiercely critical of the Kremlin, denied it had anything to do with TV Rain and The Insider and rejected the claims.
But it advised its followers in Russia to “remove reposts and links” to its materials to avoid the risk of prosecution. SOTA’s Telegram channel has around 137,000 subscribers.
“Law enforcement and courts consider publishing online to be a continuing offense. This means that you can be prosecuted for reposts from 2023, 2022, 2021,” it said.
SOTA Project was born out of a split with a separate news outlet called SOTAvision, which still covers the opposition but distanced itself from the prosecutors’ ruling on Thursday.
Since launching its offensive in Ukraine, Moscow has waged an unprecedented crackdown on dissent that rights groups have likened to Soviet-era mass repression.
Among other organizations labelled as “undesirable” in Russia are the World Wildlife Fund, Greenpeace, Transparency International and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty.


OpenAI strikes deal to bring Reddit content to ChatGPT

Updated 17 May 2024
Follow

OpenAI strikes deal to bring Reddit content to ChatGPT

  • Deal underscores Reddit’s attempt to diversify beyond its advertising business
  • Content will be used to train AI models

LONDON: Reddit has partnered with OpenAI to bring its content to popular chatbot ChatGPT, the companies said on Thursday, sending the social media platform’s shares up 12 percent in extended trade.
The deal underscores Reddit’s attempt to diversify beyond its advertising business, and follows its recent partnership with Alphabet to make its content available for training Google’s AI models.
ChatGPT and other OpenAI products will use Reddit’s application programming interface, the means by which Reddit distributes its content, following the new partnership.
OpenAI will also become a Reddit advertising partner, the company said.
Ahead of Reddit’s March IPO, Reuters reported that Reddit struck its deal with Alphabet, worth about $60 million per year.
Investors view selling its data to train AI models as a key source of revenue beyond Reddit’s advertising business.
The social media company earlier this month reported strong revenue growth and improving profitability in the first earnings since its market debut, indicating that its Google deal and its push to grow its ads business were paying off.
Reddit’s shares rose 10.5 percent to $62.31 after the bell. As of Wednesday’s close, the stock is up nearly 12 percent since its market debut in March.