Surge in Arab, Muslim candidates in Illinois elections may be reflected across US: Activists

Surge in Arab, Muslim candidates in Illinois elections may be reflected across US: Activists
Lena Matariyeh and colleague Daniel Flores, both running on the Orland Township United state in the April 1 elections. (Photo courtesy of the Arab American Democracy Coalition)
Short Url
Updated 25 February 2025
Follow

Surge in Arab, Muslim candidates in Illinois elections may be reflected across US: Activists

Surge in Arab, Muslim candidates in Illinois elections may be reflected across US: Activists
  • Number of Arabs, Muslims seeking office in Illinois has almost quadrupled compared to 2021
  • Activists say Gaza war, anti-Arab racism, Islamophobia are fueling greater engagement

CHICAGO: The number of Arab and Muslim Americans seeking office in the state of Illinois has almost quadrupled from previous years’ elections, and some activists believe it is a response to the Gaza war, as well as rising anti-Arab racism and Islamophobia.

In 2021, nine candidates filed for local elections in three counties — Cook, DuPage and Will — where the Arab and Muslim populations are concentrated.

This year, however, 34 Arab and Muslim candidates filed for local offices in the April 1 elections.

Ahmad Sows, president of the Arab American Democracy Coalition — which advocates for voter registration and engagement in the election process — said Gaza has been one of the key factors pushing more Arabs and Muslims into public engagement, including running for local public office.

“The Arab-American community has experienced a profound sense of disillusionment as they witness a lack of genuine representation among politicians for their concerns. The rise in hate crimes against Arabs is deeply troubling, and it feels disheartening to see tax dollars being used to support actions that many perceive as unjust,” he told Arab News.

“When community concerns are raised, responses from some politicians often emphasize unwavering support for Israel, leaving constituents feeling sidelined and unheard. This situation has left many Arab Americans wanting their voices to be truly acknowledged.

“They believe that running for office could be a vital step toward ensuring their community’s perspectives and needs are represented in the political landscape.”

Illinois holds its local elections before many other US states. Sows said the increased engagement in Illinois is indicative of what can be expected in other states where Arab and Muslim Americans have large voter populations, such as California, New York and New Jersey.

There are an estimated 450,000 Arab Americans in Illinois, about 10 percent of the national population living around the city of Chicago. Illinois has the fifth-largest Arab and Muslim population among US states.

Mohammed Jaber, a local schoolteacher elected to serve on the District 230 board — which has three high schools with significant Arab and Muslim populations — told Arab News that local elections are often taken for granted by all voters.

But he stressed that local elections offer Arabs and Muslims the best opportunity to directly engage American public policy.

“Our community understands that if you want to influence the nation’s national and international policies, such as in Palestine and Lebanon, you have to first influence public attitudes on the local level where you live,” said Jaber, the first Arab and Muslim to serve on the District 230 high school board representing Palos, Orland Park and Tinley Park. 

“The most effective way to do that is to run for and win election to local offices, from schools to villages, libraries and park boards.

“That’s where you can help change the false perceptions that the public has about Arabs and Muslims.”

Four efforts to elect an Arab or Muslim to the District 230 school board failed, in 1992, 2002, 2004 and 2008.

However, Jaber said the district became more accepting as the community became more engaged and involved.

Today, the Arab and Muslim student population of District 230’s three high schools has tripled, to about 25 percent of the nearly 7,700 students, he added.

However, the board last week voted against Jaber’s proposal to shift student finals in May 2026 to avoid conflicting with Eid. “We have to keep fighting to make our voices heard,” he said.

Tasneem Amine, a candidate who hopes to join Jaber on District 230 as a trustee, said her parents encouraged her to help people and pursue a career in law or public diplomacy.

“I always liked to speak up whenever I saw something wrong. I was truly passionate about helping others. I was never a bystander,” she told Arab News.

“I’ve attended several board meetings before, and although the current District 230 board has been fantastic, I truly believe that our community would benefit from having a young voice on the board who offers a fresh perspective.”

Amine, who graduated from the District 230 school system, added: “We need more Arab leaders to represent our community. Muslim constituents make up a large percentage of District 230, and therefore we need more representation as there’s power in numbers.

“Of course, however, I’m committed to representing all constituents regardless of background, because every voice matters.”

She said: “It’s time we have seats at the table, not just a single seat. This is the minimum we owe to a community that has worked hard and continues to contribute in meaningful ways.”

Lena Matariyeh, who is running for a trustee position on the influential Orland Township board — which represents large and growing Arab and Muslim populations — said the community must be more active, vocal and engaged.

“I believe in strong, community-focused leadership that prioritizes the well-being of all residents,” she told Arab News.

“Local government plays a vital role in providing essential services, fostering inclusivity, and ensuring that every voice is heard.

“I want to contribute to a township that supports families, businesses and individuals through practical, non-partisan solutions.”

She added: “I think many people, regardless of background, are feeling more compelled to step up and serve.

“Civic engagement is growing across the board, and people want to be part of the decision-making process that shapes their communities. Representation is important, but so is the desire to bring positive change.”

Suzan Atallah, who is running for a seat on the District 118 school board serving Palos, said she wants to make the schools and community better for all families and children.

“My family and I chose to live in District 118 because of the wonderful reputation of the schools. What motivated me to run are my very own kids in 118, coupled with my strong background in education as a teacher at Stagg High School for over 14 years,” she told Arab News.

“I believe people of different backgrounds should be afforded the opportunity to have a seat at the table, as reflection in the demographic is crucial in understanding student and taxpayer needs.”

While it is encouraging to see more Arabs and Muslims run for elected offices, Sows stressed that many non-Arab and non-Muslim elected officials have “stood by the community to support their needs and fight for their rights,” and should not be forgotten.


Over 100 inmates escape from a Pakistan prison after an earthquake evacuation in Karachi

Updated 3 sec ago
Follow

Over 100 inmates escape from a Pakistan prison after an earthquake evacuation in Karachi

Over 100 inmates escape from a Pakistan prison after an earthquake evacuation in Karachi
  • Senior police official Kashif Abbasi says 216 inmates who were involved in ordinary crimes fled the prison before dawn
  • No one convicted or facing trial as a militant is among those who escaped
KARACHI: More than 100 inmates escaped from a prison and at least one was killed in a shootout in the southern city of Karachi overnight after they were temporarily moved out of their cells following mild earthquake tremors, officials said Tuesday.
Kashif Abbasi, a senior police official, said 216 inmates who were involved in ordinary crimes fled the prison in the capital of Sindh province before dawn. Of those, 78 had been recaptured. No one convicted or facing trial as a militant is among those who fled, he said.
One prisoner was killed and three security officials were wounded in the ensuing shootout, but the situation has been brought under control, Abbasi said, adding that police are conducting raids to capture the remaining escapees.
Ziaul Hassan, the home minister of Sindh province, said the jailbreak occurred after prisoners were evacuated from their cells for safety during the earthquake. The inmates were still outside of the cells when a group suddenly attacked guards, seized their weapons, opened fire and fled.
Though prisoners have escaped while being transporting to court for trial, prison beaks are not common in Pakistan, where authorities have enhanced security since 2013 when the Pakistani Taliban freed more than 200 inmates in an attack on a prison in the northwestern Dera Ismail Khan district.

UK renationalizes first train operator under Labour reforms

Updated 8 min 40 sec ago
Follow

UK renationalizes first train operator under Labour reforms

UK renationalizes first train operator under Labour reforms
LONDON: A private train operator servicing parts of southern England, including London, on Sunday became the first to be returned to public ownership under a government plan to renationalize Britain’s much-maligned railways.
All UK rail operators are due to be renationalized within the next two years in a key policy launched by Prime Minister Keir Starmer following his Labour party’s return to government last July after 14 years in opposition.
“South Western Railway is now under public ownership. And this is just the start,” Starmer said on X, formerly Twitter, naming the service kickstarting his government’s plan.
He vowed the renationalization “will put passengers first,” with “better services, with simpler ticketing, on more comfortable trains.”
Train passengers in Britain suffer from frequent cancelations, in addition to high ticket prices and regular confusion over which services they can be used on.
The privatization of rail operations took place in the mid-1990s under the Conservative prime minister of the time, John Major, but the rail network remained public, run by Network Rail.
Four of the 14 operators in England are already run by the state owing to poor performance in recent years, but this was originally meant to be a temporary fix before a return to the private sector.
Labour triumphed over the Conservative party in elections last year, with its manifesto including promises to fix the country’s ailing transport services.
Legislation was approved in November to bring rail operators into public ownership when the private companies’ contracts expire — or sooner in the event of poor management — and be managed by “Great British Railways.”
Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said in a statement that will end “30 years of fragmentation,” but warned that “change isn’t going to happen overnight.”


“We’ve always been clear that public ownership isn’t a silver bullet, but we are really firing this starting gun in that race for a truly 21st-century railway, and that does mean refocusing away from private profit and toward the public good,” she added.
In an example of how passengers might not immediately notice much difference, South Western’s first service under public ownership on Sunday was set to include a rail replacement bus because of engineering work.
Government figures show that the equivalent of four percent of train services in Britain were canceled in the year to April 26.
The rate was three percent for South Western.
Rail unions — which have staged a stream of strikes in recent years over pay and conditions due to a cost-of-living crisis — welcomed the state takeover.
“We’re delighted that Britain’s railways are being brought back where they belong — into the public sector,” said Mick Whelan, general secretary of union Aslef.
“Everyone in the rail industry knows that privatization... didn’t, and doesn’t, work,” he added.
Two operators serving towns and cities in southeastern and eastern England are next to be brought back into public ownership by late 2025.
All the current contracts are set to expire by 2027.
UK media reported that the renationalization of South Western means a third of journeys are now on publicly owned services.
The government has said renationalization will save up to £150 million ($200 million) per year because it will no longer have to pay compensation fees to rail operators.
The main rail operators in Scotland and Wales, where transport policy is handled by the devolved administrations in Edinburgh and Cardiff, are also state-owned.

UK renationalizes first train operator under Labour reforms

Updated 11 min 27 sec ago
Follow

UK renationalizes first train operator under Labour reforms

UK renationalizes first train operator under Labour reforms
LONDON: A private train operator servicing parts of southern England, including London, on Sunday became the first to be returned to public ownership under a government plan to renationalize Britain’s much-maligned railways.
All UK rail operators are due to be renationalized within the next two years in a key policy launched by Prime Minister Keir Starmer following his Labour party’s return to government last July after 14 years in opposition.
“South Western Railway is now under public ownership. And this is just the start,” Starmer said on X, formerly Twitter, naming the service kickstarting his government’s plan.
He vowed the renationalization “will put passengers first,” with “better services, with simpler ticketing, on more comfortable trains.”
Train passengers in Britain suffer from frequent cancelations, in addition to high ticket prices and regular confusion over which services they can be used on.
The privatization of rail operations took place in the mid-1990s under the Conservative prime minister of the time, John Major, but the rail network remained public, run by Network Rail.
Four of the 14 operators in England are already run by the state owing to poor performance in recent years, but this was originally meant to be a temporary fix before a return to the private sector.
Labour triumphed over the Conservative party in elections last year, with its manifesto including promises to fix the country’s ailing transport services.
Legislation was approved in November to bring rail operators into public ownership when the private companies’ contracts expire — or sooner in the event of poor management — and be managed by “Great British Railways.”
Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said in a statement that will end “30 years of fragmentation,” but warned that “change isn’t going to happen overnight.”


“We’ve always been clear that public ownership isn’t a silver bullet, but we are really firing this starting gun in that race for a truly 21st-century railway, and that does mean refocusing away from private profit and toward the public good,” she added.
In an example of how passengers might not immediately notice much difference, South Western’s first service under public ownership on Sunday was set to include a rail replacement bus because of engineering work.
Government figures show that the equivalent of four percent of train services in Britain were canceled in the year to April 26.
The rate was three percent for South Western.
Rail unions — which have staged a stream of strikes in recent years over pay and conditions due to a cost-of-living crisis — welcomed the state takeover.
“We’re delighted that Britain’s railways are being brought back where they belong — into the public sector,” said Mick Whelan, general secretary of union Aslef.
“Everyone in the rail industry knows that privatization... didn’t, and doesn’t, work,” he added.
Two operators serving towns and cities in southeastern and eastern England are next to be brought back into public ownership by late 2025.
All the current contracts are set to expire by 2027.
UK media reported that the renationalization of South Western means a third of journeys are now on publicly owned services.
The government has said renationalization will save up to £150 million ($200 million) per year because it will no longer have to pay compensation fees to rail operators.
The main rail operators in Scotland and Wales, where transport policy is handled by the devolved administrations in Edinburgh and Cardiff, are also state-owned.

Trump ‘open’ to meeting Ukraine, Russia leaders to push ceasefire

Trump ‘open’ to meeting Ukraine, Russia leaders to push ceasefire
Updated 03 June 2025
Follow

Trump ‘open’ to meeting Ukraine, Russia leaders to push ceasefire

Trump ‘open’ to meeting Ukraine, Russia leaders to push ceasefire
  • Russia will only agree a full ceasefire if Ukrainian troops pull back entirely from four regions — Donetsk, Lugansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson

ISTANBUL: US President Donald Trump is “open” to meeting his Russian and Ukrainian counterparts in Turkiye, the White House said, after the two sides failed on Monday to make headway toward an elusive ceasefire.
Delegations from both sides did, however, agree another large-scale prisoner exchange in their meeting in Istanbul, which in mid-May also hosted their first round of face-to-face talks.
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan proposed that Russian President Vladimir Putin, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Trump come together for a third round later this month in either Istanbul or Ankara.
Putin has so far refused such a meeting. But Zelensky has said he is willing, underlining that key issues can only be resolved at leaders-level.
Trump, who wants a swift end to the three-year war, is “open” to a three-way summit “if it comes to that, but he wants both of these leaders and both sides to come to the table together,” White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt said in Washington.
But despite Trump’s willingness to meet with Putin and Zelensky, no US representative took part in Monday’s talks in Istanbul, according to a State Department spokesperson.
Zelensky said that, “We are very much awaiting strong steps from the United States” and urged Trump to toughen sanctions on Russia to “push” it to agree to a full ceasefire.
In Monday’s meeting, Ukraine said that Moscow had rejected its call for an unconditional ceasefire. It offered instead a partial truce of two to three days in some areas of the frontline.
Russia will only agree a full ceasefire if Ukrainian troops pull back entirely from four regions — Donetsk, Lugansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson — according to its negotiating terms reported on by Russian state media. Russia currently only partly controls those regions.
Moscow has also demanded a ban on Kyiv joining NATO, limiting Ukraine’s military and ending Western military support.
Top negotiators from both sides agreed to swap all severely wounded soldiers and captured fighters under the age of 25.
Russia’s lead negotiator Vladimir Medinsky said it would involve “at least 1,000” on each side.
The two sides also agreed to hand over the bodies of 6,000 soldiers, Ukraine said after the talks.
“The Russian side continued to reject the motion of an unconditional ceasefire,” Ukraine’s Deputy Foreign Minister Sergiy Kyslytsya told reporters after the talks.
Russia said it had offered a limited pause in fighting.
“We have proposed a specific ceasefire for two to three days in certain areas of the front line,” Medinsky said, adding that this was needed to collect the bodies of dead soldiers from the battlefield.
Zelensky hit back on social media: “I think ‘idiots’, because the whole point of a ceasefire is to stop people from becoming dead in the first place.”
Kyiv said it would study a document the Russian side handed its negotiators outlining its demands for both peace and a full ceasefire.
Zelensky said after the Istanbul talks concluded that any deal for lasting peace must not “reward” Putin, and has called for an immediate and unconditional ceasefire to cover combat on air, sea and land.
Ukrainian Defense Minister Rustem Umerov, who led his country’s delegation, called for a next meeting to take place before the end of June. He also said a Putin-Zelensky summit should be discussed.
Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan said after the talks — inside a luxury hotel on the banks of the Bosphorus — that they were held “in a constructive atmosphere.”
“During the meeting, the parties decided to continue preparations for a possible meeting at the leader level,” Fidan said on social media.
Tens of thousands have been killed since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, with swathes of eastern and southern Ukraine destroyed and millions forced to flee their homes in Europe’s largest refugee crisis since World War II.
In the front-line town of Dobropillya in eastern Ukraine, 53-year-old Volodymyr told AFP he had no hope left for an end to the conflict.
“We thought that everything would stop. And now there is nothing to wait for. We have no home, nothing. We were almost killed by drones,” he said.
After months of setbacks for Kyiv’s military, Ukraine said it had carried out an audacious attack on Sunday, smuggling drones into Russia and then firing them at air bases, damaging around 40 strategic Russian bombers worth $7 billion in a major special operation.


US commerce secretary expects India trade deal soon

US commerce secretary expects India trade deal soon
Updated 03 June 2025
Follow

US commerce secretary expects India trade deal soon

US commerce secretary expects India trade deal soon

WASHINGTON: US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on Monday voiced optimism for a trade deal soon with India to avoid tariffs threatened by President Donald Trump.
“You should expect a deal between the United States and India in the not too distant future,” he told the US-India Strategic Partnership Forum, which promotes relations between the two countries, calling himself “very optimistic.”
Trump has set a delayed deadline of July 9 for countries to avoid sweeping tariffs, as he seeks to shake up the global economy to correct what he says is unfairness to the United States.
Lutnick, a strong advocate of tariffs, said he was a “great fan” of India — but voiced longstanding concern about the emerging economy’s use of tariffs.
On tariff negotiations with India, “bringing them down to a level that is reasonable and appropriate so we can be great trading partners with each other, I think is absolutely on the table,” Lutnick said.
“There were certain things that the Indian government did that generally rubbed the United States the wrong way. For instance, they generally buy military gear from Russia,” he said.
But he said that Trump believed in raising concerns and “the Indian government is addressing it specifically and directly.”