Lebanon awaits US envoy, maintaining a firm stance on UN Resolution 1701

White House envoy to the Middle East Amos Hochstein is due in Lebanon on Tuesday. (File/AFP)
White House envoy to the Middle East Amos Hochstein is due in Lebanon on Tuesday. (File/AFP)
Short Url
Updated 18 November 2024
Follow

Lebanon awaits US envoy, maintaining a firm stance on UN Resolution 1701

White House envoy to the Middle East Amos Hochstein is due in Lebanon on Tuesday. (File/AFP)
  • Israeli strike on central Beirut kills five

BEIRUT: White House envoy to the Middle East Amos Hochstein is due in Lebanon on Tuesday for talks on a ceasefire as the Israeli army continued to carry out violent airstrikes, causing massive destruction.

Airstrikes receded in Beirut and its southern suburbs but intensified in southern Lebanon.

Sunday saw intense attacks and assassinations in Beirut’s southern suburbs and neighborhoods.

Israeli media outlets reported Hochstein would arrive in Tel Aviv on Wednesday.

His visit comes as part of his previously disrupted efforts to reach a diplomatic solution to stop the expanded war, which has been ongoing for 60 days between the Israeli army and Hezbollah.

Lebanon has yet to confirm Hochstein’s visit to Beirut. Citing a Lebanese political source, Reuters reported that “Hochstein arrives in Beirut on Tuesday,” while Israel’s Channel 12 announced that “Hochstein arrives in Tel Aviv on Wednesday.”

Fares Gemayel, media advisor to the caretaker prime minister, said Najib Mikati’s schedule was still the same and had yet to be modified.

He told Arab News: “We were not informed of Hochstein’s visit, and just like you, we heard that he is coming and that he is meeting with Mikati and Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, but nothing is confirmed.”

Following his meeting with Berri, caretaker Labor Minister Mustafa Bayram said Berri looped him in on the draft ceasefire proposal, adding that “the situation was positive,” but “all is well that ends well.”

Bayram, a Hezbollah minister, said that Berri — whom Hezbollah assigned to negotiate with the West — was waiting for Hochstein’s visit on Tuesday.

“He’s waiting to inform him of Lebanon’s positive stance in this regard, and therefore, all eyes will be on the Israeli stance, whether it wants to stop its aggression or continue with its war crimes witnessed live by people,” he added.

Bayram pointed out that the expansion of war was an Israeli decision, saying that “war crimes are not a sign of victory for the aggressor.”

He clarified: “Lebanon is committed to Resolution 1701 fully, including its mechanisms, so why do we want to put in place other mechanisms that would complicate the matter?”

Bayram emphasized that “there are points in the draft that were not even discussed because it’s impossible to accept them, including Israel’s right to act freely.”

He said no patriotic Lebanese would agree to such issues and waive their sovereignty.

He also stressed that Hezbollah “abides by Resolution 1701, which stipulates that Israel should stop its violations against Lebanon, so is it going to stop them?”

He added: “The resistance is a reaction and not an action. If the Israelis abide by the resolution, we can have a different discussion, especially since what the resistance owns is no longer linked to a 10 km geographical area.

“The resistance can fight anywhere, but it all comes down to whether or not the Israelis will abide by 1701.”

Bayram believes that “the more you concede to the Israelis, the more they ask and kill you.”

Hezbollah submitted to Berri its response to the US draft proposal based on Resolution 1701.

However, the response leaked to some media outlets and included comments proposing a return to how things were before the last war. According to previous Israeli officials’ statements, Israel rejects this.

The Lebanese side is seeking international and American guarantees regarding Israel’s commitment to the agreement, ensuring that Israel does not violate Resolution 1701 under any pretext to carry out operations in Lebanon.

Furthermore, Lebanon also demands that the monitoring committee for the implementation of Resolution 1701 remain limited to the US, France, Lebanon, Israel, and the UN without any expansion.

Hezbollah rejects “any expansion of the role of UNIFIL forces” and “firmly opposes any enhancement of the UNIFIL forces’ mandate,” emphasizing that “coordination between these forces and the Lebanese army must persist, and that UNIFIL should not operate in private areas without prior agreement with the army.”

Furthermore, Hezbollah calls for the “prompt return of displaced individuals, preventing Israel from establishing a border security zone, and the recognition of Lebanon’s entitlement to reconstruction without external interference.”

Additionally, they demand the release of Lebanese citizens detained by Israel during the recent confrontations.

Israeli opposition leader Benny Gantz, head of the State Camp party, stated on Monday that “the condition for any agreement with Lebanon is the absolute freedom of Israeli operations in response to any violation of the agreement.”

The Iranian Foreign Ministry stated on Monday that “the Lebanese are capable of determining their interests and making decisions regarding any initiative related to halting Israel’s crimes.”

It indicated that Tehran would spare no effort in assisting the Lebanese people.

Israel escalated its military actions against Hezbollah on Sunday, resuming targeted assassinations that included the killing of Hezbollah’s media relations officer Mohammed Afif, along with four of his associates — Hilal Tarmas, Moussa Haidar, Mahmoud Al-Sharqawi, and Hussein Ramadan — in an airstrike on Beirut.

Israel announced that Mahmoud Madi, head of operations for Hezbollah’s southern front, was also targeted in a separate airstrike on Beirut later that evening.

The southern front of Lebanon remained intense on Monday as Israeli soldiers attempted to reach Al-Bayada hill after passing through the town of Chamaa in the Tyre district.

They conducted extensive airstrikes to secure their movements, targeting the valleys with phosphorus shells.

Also on Monday, Hezbollah announced that its fighters targeted an Israeli army gathering south of the town of Khiam for the fourth time and another group with the Israeli army in the settlement of Kiryat Shmona.

Israeli media reported that “rocket debris fell in Goren in the Upper Galilee, causing damage to a house, a building, and vehicles during the rocket barrage on Kiryat Shmona.”

The Israeli army announced the destruction of dozens of rocket launch platforms and combat equipment in southern Lebanon.

Israeli media reported that over 1,450 rockets had been launched toward Israel since the onset of the conflict.

The Israeli army carried out a series of violent airstrikes targeting the areas of Tyre, Nabatieh, Iqlim Al-Tufah, and Jizzine, causing massive destruction.

A strike on the water facility building in Tyre killed several people, including the Deputy Mayor of Burj Al-Shamli Qassim Wehbi and the Mukhtar of Tyre Samer Shoghari.

In a separate incident, two people were killed by an air raid that hit a house on Al-Madinah Al-Kashfiyah Road, between the areas of Nabatieh Al-Fawqa and Zawtar.

Additionally, airstrikes on the city of Nabatieh killed several citizens, namely Fadel and Hassan Mansour, Jawad Al-Sabouri, and Hussein Mansour, leaving several more injured.

Louai Al-Moussawi, whose family was killed by an Israeli strike when the attacks first started, was also killed in Nabatieh Al-Fawqa.

Red Cross and International Committee of the Red Cross ambulances entered the town of Baraachit.

They recovered the remains of the paramedics of the Hezbollah-affiliated Islamic Health Authority, who were killed in an airstrike that targeted the area weeks ago.

Lebanon's Health Ministry said Israel also struck a densely packed Beirut neighborhood, killing five people.

Monday's raid targeted a residential apartment, an office for Mayor Hasan Shuman, and a street cafe.

Zakat Al-Blat is a densely populated neighborhood shared between Hezbollah and the Amal Movement.

Hundreds of displaced people from the southern and south suburbs have taken refuge.

Relief aid was being distributed to the people in the area.

The area was targeted a month ago when an Israeli warplane bombed a residential apartment in a building that was used as a center for paramedics of the Islamic Health Authority affiliated with Hezbollah.

The raid led to the death of eight people.


Syria wildfires contained after 10 days

Syria wildfires contained after 10 days
Updated 33 min 49 sec ago
Follow

Syria wildfires contained after 10 days

Syria wildfires contained after 10 days
  • The blazes in the coastal province of Latakia broke out amid an intense heatwave across the region
  • UN humanitarian agency says fires destroyed about 100 square kilometers of forest and farmland

DAMASCUS: Syria’s civil defense agency on Sunday said wildfires in the country’s west, which have burned vast tracts of forest and farmland and forced evacuations, had been brought under control after 10 days.

In a statement on Facebook, the agency said that “with the spread of the fires halted and the fire hotspots brought under control on all fronts” on Saturday, teams on the ground were working to cool down the affected areas while monitoring any signs of reignition.

The blazes in the coastal province of Latakia broke out amid an intense heatwave across the region.

The UN humanitarian agency OCHA said they destroyed about 100 square kilometers of forest and farmland.

As the fires raged, Syrian emergency workers faced tough conditions including high temperatures, strong winds, rugged mountainous terrain and the danger of explosive war remnants.

This all comes in a country worn down by years of conflict and economic crisis.

In a post on X, the Syrian minister for emergencies and disaster management, Raed Al-Saleh, said that with help from Turkish, Jordanian, Lebanese, Qatari and Iraqi teams, firefighters had “managed to halt the spread of the fire on all fronts, which is the most important step toward containing the wildfires.”

The “situation is the best it has been in the past 10 days,” Saleh said late Saturday.

“There are still threats due to wind activity, but we are working to prevent any renewed expansion of the fires,” the minister added.

The civil defense agency said rescue teams were carrying out “operations to open pathways and firebreaks within the forests... in order to reduce the chances of fire spreading in case of reignition.”

Authorities have not reported any casualties, but several towns in Latakia province have been evacuated as a precaution.

Nearly seven months after the ousting of longtime ruler Bashar Assad, Syria is still reeling from more than a decade of civil war that ravaged the country’s economy, infrastructure and public services.

With man-made climate change increasing the likelihood and intensity of droughts and wildfires worldwide, Syria has also been battered by heatwaves and low rainfall.

In June, the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization said that Syria had “not seen such bad climate conditions in 60 years.”


Apartment fire in Turkiye’s Ankara kills 3, including a baby

Apartment fire in Turkiye’s Ankara kills 3, including a baby
Updated 29 sec ago
Follow

Apartment fire in Turkiye’s Ankara kills 3, including a baby

Apartment fire in Turkiye’s Ankara kills 3, including a baby
  • The blaze started late Saturday night on the fourth floor and spread rapidly, according to local media
  • Firefighters took four hours to extinguish the flames. The state-run Anadolu Agency reported that 39 suffered light smoke inhalation, including seven firefighters

Istanbul: A fire at a 26-story apartment building in the Turkish capital, Ankara, killed three people, including a three-and-a-half-month-old baby, local media said.

The blaze broke out at around 10:00 p.m. local time Saturday night on the fourth floor and quickly spread through the structure, according to the state-run Anadolu Agency. It took firefighters four hours to put out the fire.

The agency also reported that 39 suffered light smoke inhalation, including seven firefighters. Paramedics attended to 26 people on site, while 20 others have been hospitalized, one in critical condition.


59 Palestinians in Gaza killed by Israeli airstrikes or shot dead while seeking aid

59 Palestinians in Gaza killed by Israeli airstrikes or shot dead while seeking aid
Updated 13 July 2025
Follow

59 Palestinians in Gaza killed by Israeli airstrikes or shot dead while seeking aid

59 Palestinians in Gaza killed by Israeli airstrikes or shot dead while seeking aid
  • The Red Cross said its field hospital saw its largest influx of dead in more than a year of operation after the shootings

DEIR AL-BALAH, Gaza Strip: At least 31 Palestinians were fatally shot on their way to an aid distribution site in the Gaza Strip on Saturday, while Israeli airstrikes killed at least 28 Palestinians including four children, Palestinian hospital officials and witnesses said.

There were no signs of a breakthrough in ceasefire talks following two days of meetings between US President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Trump had said he was nearing an agreement between Israel and Hamas that would potentially wind down the war.

The 31 Palestinians shot dead were on their way to a distribution site run by the Israeli-backed American organization Gaza Humanitarian Foundation near Rafah in southern Gaza, hospital officials and witnesses said.

The Red Cross said its field hospital saw its largest influx of dead in more than a year of operation after the shootings, and that the overwhelming majority of the more than 100 people hurt had gunshot wounds.

Airstrikes in central Gaza’s Deir Al-Balah killed 13 including the four children, officials at Al-Aqsa Martyrs Hospital said. Fifteen others were killed in Khan Younis in the south, according to Nasser Hospital. Israel’s military did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Intense airstrikes continued Saturday evening in the area of Beit Hanoun in northern Gaza.

Israelis rallied yet again for a ceasefire deal. “Arrogance is what brought the disaster upon us,” former hostage Eli Sharabi said of Israeli leaders.

Teen’s first attempt to pick up food ends in death

The 21-month war has left much of Gaza’s population of over 2 million reliant on outside aid while food security experts warn of famine. Israel blocked and then restricted aid entry after ending the latest ceasefire in March.

“All responsive individuals reported they were attempting to access food distribution sites,” the Red Cross said after the shootings near Rafah, noting the “alarming frequency and scale” of such mass casualty incidents.

Israel’s military said it fired warning shots toward people it said were behaving suspiciously to prevent them from approaching. It said it was not aware of any casualties. The GHF said no incident occurred near its sites.

Abdullah Al-Haddad said he was 200 meters from the aid distribution site run by the GHF close to the Shakoush area when an Israeli tank started firing at crowds of Palestinians.

“We were together, and they shot us at once,” he said, writhing in pain from a leg wound at Nasser Hospital.

Mohammed Jamal Al-Sahloo, another witness, said Israel’s military had ordered them to proceed to the site when the shooting started.

Sumaya Al-Sha’er’s 17-year-old son, Nasir, was killed, hospital officials said.

“He said to me, ‘Mom, you don’t have flour and today I’ll go and bring you flour, even if I die, I’ll go and get it,’” she said. “But he never came back home.”

Until then, she said, she had prevented the teenager from going to GHF sites because she thought it was too dangerous.

Witnesses, health officials and UN officials say hundreds have been killed by Israeli fire while heading toward GHF distribution points through military zones off limits to independent media. The military has acknowledged firing warning shots at Palestinians who it says approached its forces in a suspicious manner.

The GHF denies there has been violence in or around its sites. But two of its contractors told The Associated Press that their colleagues have fired live ammunition and stun grenades as Palestinians scramble for food, allegations the foundation denied.

In a separate effort, the UN and aid groups say they struggle to distribute humanitarian aid because of Israeli military restrictions and a breakdown of law and order that has led to widespread looting.

The first fuel – 150,000 liters – entered Gaza this week after 130 days, a joint statement by UN aid bodies said, calling it a small amount for the “the backbone of survival in Gaza.” Fuel runs hospitals, water systems, transport and more, the statement said.

Hamas-led militants killed some 1,200 people in their Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel that sparked the war and abducted 251. Hamas still holds some 50 hostages, with at least 20 believed to remain alive.

Israel’s retaliatory offensive has killed over 57,800 Palestinians, more than half of them women and children, according to Gaza’s Health Ministry. The ministry, under Gaza’s Hamas-run government, doesn’t differentiate between civilians and combatants in its count. The UN and other international organizations see its figures as the most reliable statistics on war casualties.


Iran says it would resume nuclear talks with US if guaranteed no further attacks

Iran says it would resume nuclear talks with US if guaranteed no further attacks
Updated 13 July 2025
Follow

Iran says it would resume nuclear talks with US if guaranteed no further attacks

Iran says it would resume nuclear talks with US if guaranteed no further attacks
  • Following the US strikes, Iran suspended cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog, which led to the departure of inspectors
  • Top Iran envoy says that under Iranian law, the country will answer the agency’s request for cooperation ‘case by case’

Iran’s foreign minister said Saturday that his country would accept a resumption of nuclear talks with the US if there were assurances of no more attacks against it, state media reported.

Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said in a speech to Tehran-based foreign diplomats that Iran has always been ready and will be ready in the future for talks about its nuclear program, but, “assurance should be provided that in case of a resumption of talks, the trend will not lead to war.”

Referring to the 12-day Israeli bombardment of Iran’s nuclear and military sites, and the US strike on June 22, Araghchi said that if the US and others wish to resume talks with Iran, “first of all, there should be a firm guarantee that such actions will not be repeated. The attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities has made it more difficult and complicated to achieve a solution based on negotiations.”

Following the strikes, Iran suspended cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog, which led to the departure of inspectors.

Araghchi said that under Iranian law, the country will answer the agency’s request for cooperation “case by case,” based on Iran’s interests. He also said any inspection by the agency should be done based on Iran’s “security” concerns as well as the safety of the inspectors. “The risk of proliferation of radioactive ingredients and an explosion of ammunition that remains from the war in the attacked nuclear sites is serious,” he said.

He also reiterated Iran’s position on the need to continue enriching uranium on its soil. US President Donald Trump has insisted that cannot happen.

Israel claims it acted because Tehran was within reach of a nuclear weapon. US intelligence agencies and the International Atomic Energy Agency had assessed Iran last had an organized nuclear weapons program in 2003, though Tehran had been enriching uranium up to 60 percent – a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90 percent.

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian in an interview published Monday said the US airstrikes so badly damaged his country’s nuclear facilities that Iranian authorities still have not been able to access them to survey the destruction.


Why BCG’s involvement in Gaza marks an all-time low for consulting firms

Why BCG’s involvement in Gaza marks an all-time low for consulting firms
Updated 13 July 2025
Follow

Why BCG’s involvement in Gaza marks an all-time low for consulting firms

Why BCG’s involvement in Gaza marks an all-time low for consulting firms
  • FT investigation examined Boston Consulting Group’s role in Gaza aid planning, including plans for Palestinian relocation
  • BCG has disavowed the work and fired two senior partners — but the scandal sheds light on the wider industry’s irresponsibility

LONDON: A Financial Times investigation, published on July 4, found that a consulting firm connected to the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation secured a multimillion-dollar contract to help shape the initiative and a proposal for the possible “relocation” of Palestinians from the Gaza Strip.

The Boston Consulting Group was found to have played a central role in designing and managing the US- and Israeli-backed project, which aimed to replace the UN as the primary coordinator of humanitarian aid in Gaza.

Amid growing criticism, BCG denied any ongoing involvement in the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. In a June 7 statement, the firm said it initially provided “pro bono support” in October 2024 to help launch “an aid organization intended to operate alongside other relief efforts.”

BCG has faced heavy scrutiny for its role in Gaza’s postwar reconstruction, mainly through its work with the controversial Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. (AFP file)

The firm said two senior US-based partners who led the initiative “failed to disclose the full nature of the work” and later engaged in “unauthorized” activities outside the firm’s oversight.

“Their actions reflected a serious failure of judgment and adherence to our standards,” the firm said. “We are shocked and outraged by the actions of these two partners. They have been exited from the firm.

“BCG disavows the work they undertook. It has been stopped, and BCG has not and will not be paid for any of their work.”

The company emphasized it is strengthening internal controls to prevent future breaches. “We deeply regret that in this situation we did not live up to our standards,” the statement said. “We are committed to accountability for our failures and humility in how we move forward.”

FAST FACTS:

• A Financial Times investigation examined BCG’s role in Gaza aid planning, including controversial proposals for Palestinian relocation.

• BCG disavowed the work and fired two senior partners, but documents suggest deeper involvement and lapses in internal oversight.

• The scandal underscores wider concerns about consulting firms’ ethics, with similar controversies involving PwC, KPMG, EY and McKinsey.

Following the FT story, BCG issued another statement on July 6 disputing aspects of the reporting. “Recent media reporting has misrepresented BCG’s role in post-war Gaza reconstruction,” the firm said.

BCG reiterated that the initiative was not an official company project and was carried out in secret. “Two former partners initiated this work, even though the lead partner was categorically told not to,” the statement read.

“This work was not a BCG project. It was orchestrated and run secretly outside any BCG scope or approvals. We fully disavow this work. BCG was not paid for any of this work.”

Buildings that were destroyed during the Israeli ground and air operations stand in northern of Gaza Strip as seen from southern Israel on July 10, 2025. (AP Photo)

However, individuals familiar with “Aurora” told the FT that BCG’s involvement ran deeper. The report revealed that BCG created a financial model for Gaza’s postwar reconstruction that included scenarios for mass displacement.

This revelation intensified scrutiny of the consulting industry’s ethical boundaries.

“Consulting companies… are held to a higher standard of professionalism and ethics than other lines of work,” Dr. Abdel Aziz Aluwaisheg, the Gulf Cooperation Council assistant secretary-general for political affairs and negotiation, wrote in an April opinion piece for Arab News.

He warned that without corrective action, major firms risk alienating clients.

Displaced Palestinians carrying relief supplies from the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) return from aid distribution centers in Rafah to their tents in the southern Gaza Strip on May 29, 2025. (AFP)

ndeed, in recent years, top consulting firms like McKinsey, PwC, KPMG, and EY have faced growing scrutiny for putting profit over ethics, with scandals revealing conduct lapses worldwide.

McKinsey, for instance, faced heavy backlash for its role in the US opioid crisis. The firm was accused of helping Purdue Pharma and other manufacturers to aggressively market addictive painkillers, including OxyContin, The New York Times reported.

Aluwaisheg noted in his op-ed that some of these ethical lapses “are quite common throughout the consulting business.”

However, he added, “big firms are more likely to commit them,” citing sprawling operations that limit senior management oversight.

The industry’s core business model may be the issue: consulting firms adopted law firms’ high-fee model for expert advice — without their legal liability.

Despite this, demand for consulting services remains high. Aluwaisheg believes governments and businesses will continue to need outside expertise.

People walk by PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) New York headquarters. (AFP)

Still, accountability concerns have prompted some governments to take action. In February, Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund banned PwC from taking on new advisory and consulting contracts for one year.

Some media outlets reported that the decision was related to an ethical violation tied to an alleged recruitment of a senior-level employee from the client’s side. The suspension did not impact PwC’s auditing work.

These events highlight ongoing concerns over consulting firms’ roles in controversial actions. In April 2024, KPMG’s Dutch arm was fined $25 million after over 500 staff cheated on internal training exams, Reuters reported.

Yet the BCG case may represent a new low for the industry.

The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation’s model bypassed traditional organizations like the UN, restricted aid distribution to limited sites under Israeli oversight and relied on private security contractors. This move has had deadly consequences.

According to Gaza’s health authority, at least 740 Palestinians have been killed and almost 4,900 injured while attempting to reach aid centers, drawing condemnation from humanitarian organizations and UN officials.

Displaced Palestinians look around on alert in the wake of gunfire shots as they receive food packages from a US-backed foundation pledging to distribute humanitarian aid in western Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip on May 27, 2025. (AFP)

UN aid chief Tom Fletcher called the initiative a “fig leaf for further violence and displacement” of Palestinians in the war-torn enclave.

In a July 10 letter to the FT editor, BCG’s CEO Christoph Schweizer pushed back against the allegations that his firm endorsed or profited from projects related to Gaza.

“None of that is true,” Schweizer wrote, adding that “a few people from BCG were involved in such work. They never should have been.”

Adding another layer to the controversy, FT reported on July 6 that staff from the Tony Blair Institute were also implicated in postwar planning that included scenarios for mass Palestinian displacement — despite being prominent advocates for peace in the Middle East.

Christoph Schweizer, CEO of Boston Consulting Group. (Supplied)

The plan, seen by the FT, imagined Gaza as a regional economic hub, complete with a “Trump Riviera” and “Elon Musk Smart Manufacturing Zone,” based on financial models developed by BCG.

While the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change denied authoring “The Great Trust” blueprint, it acknowledged two staff joined Gaza planning calls and chats. It also denied backing population relocation.

Arab News approached the TBI for comment, but did not receive a response by the time of publication.

Nevertheless, its involvement has triggered additional concerns about the ethics of postwar reconstruction planning and the role of consulting firms in shaping policies with far-reaching humanitarian consequences.