Saudi Airlines flight’s landing gear catches fire at Peshawar airport, prompting emergency response

Short Url
Updated 11 July 2024
Follow

Saudi Airlines flight’s landing gear catches fire at Peshawar airport, prompting emergency response

  • Air traffic controller saw sparks coming out of the left landing gear and notified fire and rescue services
  • PCAA says all 276 passengers and 21 crew members safely exited the aircraft using inflatable slides

ISLAMABAD: The landing gear of a Saudi Airlines flight caught fire upon landing at Peshawar’s Bacha Khan International Airport on Thursday, the Pakistan Civil Aviation Authority (PCAA) said in a statement, prompting the air traffic controller to deploy fire tenders to handle the emergency situation.

Incidents involving landing gear fires and other emergencies have occasionally occurred with different airlines at various Pakistani airports.

To address such situations, Pakistani authorities have implemented comprehensive emergency response plans to ensure they meet international safety standards and are prepared to handle these eventualities effectively.

“After Saudi Airlines flight 792 landed at Peshawar Airport, the air traffic controller noticed smoke and sparks coming from the left landing gear,” the PCAA said in a statement. “The air traffic controller informed the pilot about the smoke and sparks coming from the left landing gear.”

It informed the air traffic controller immediately notified the fire and rescue services, who promptly arrived at the scene and immediately controlled the fire, preventing a major accident.

“All 276 passengers and 21 crew members safely exited the aircraft using inflatable slides,” the statement added. “The Saudi Airlines flight had arrived from Riyadh to Peshawar.”

Later, Saudi Airlines acknowledged the incident, saying all passengers and crewmembers were safely evacuated.

“The aircraft is now undergoing technical evaluation by specialists,” it announced in a statement. “This includes repairs, along with comprehensive inspections and subsequent tests, to ensure its safety.”

The Pakistani aviation industry has been under international scrutiny for its security standards in recent years. The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) conducted a comprehensive assessment last year and noted significant improvements.

To ensure compliance with international standards, the PCAA has actively sought certification from various countries.

Earlier this month, the UAE General Civil Aviation Authority certified the aviation security at Islamabad and Karachi airports, confirming that they meet “international standards.”


Pakistan sees minimal fiscal impact from India standoff as economists estimate billions in losses

Updated 5 sec ago
Follow

Pakistan sees minimal fiscal impact from India standoff as economists estimate billions in losses

  • Economists warn prolonged conflict could deter investment in both India and Pakistan
  • Estimated total losses reach $80-90 billion, with 20 percent borne by Pakistan and the rest by India

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s finance ministry said on Tuesday the recent four-day standoff with India will not have a significant fiscal impact, as analysts estimated that the conflict cost both countries losses of around $1 billion per hour.

Tensions between India and Pakistan escalated after a deadly April 22 attack on Hindu tourists in Indian-administered Kashmir, which killed 26 people. India blamed Pakistan for the assault, an allegation denied by officials in Islamabad, though it still led to one the worst military confronts between the two nuclear-armed neighbors in decades.

A ceasefire was announced on Saturday by US President Donald Trump, following four days of fighting and intense diplomatic efforts led by Washington. However, the military confrontation, by then, had disrupted stock markets, led to airspace closures, escalated defense spending and caused economic losses amounting to billions of dollars.

“The current standoff with India won’t have a large fiscal impact on Pakistan,” Khurram Schehzad, adviser to the finance minister, told Arab News.

“It can be managed within the current fiscal space, with no need for a new economic assessment,” he added.

Schehzad said Pakistan’s economic resilience was evident from a new record at the Pakistan Stock Exchange, which on Monday posted the highest single-day gain in over 26 years, surging by 10,123 points or 9.45 percent, significantly surpassing the losses recorded last week following the Indian strike.

“Pakistan’s measured and responsible response, in both its narrative and actions on the ground, has caught investors’ eye, alongside the potential positive spillover effect of a possible settlement in the US-China tariff issue,” he added.

Arab News reached out to the defense ministry and Pakistan’s military media wing for official estimates of the conflict’s cost, but did not receive a response by the time of filing this story.

Meanwhile, economists said the recent military standoff inflicted heavy financial losses on both countries, with combined costs approaching $1 billion per hour.

“The recent conflict, over an 87-hour period, I think cost about a billion dollars an hour for both countries,” economist Farrukh Saleem told Arab News.

He estimated total combined losses of between $80 and $90 billion over the four-day period.

“About 20 percent of that was incurred by Pakistan and a good 80 to 85 percent by India,” he added.

Saleem said daily economic losses from the conflict, including stock market declines and other impacts, amounted to around $20 billion per day, with Pakistan losing up to $4 billion and India as much as $16 billion per day.

“I have tried to put things together. If this conflict had continued for 30 days, my estimate is that both countries would have lost a good $500 billion, with over a $400 billion loss for the Indian economy,” he added.

Explaining India’s higher losses, he noted that each Rafale fighter jet costs around $240 million, while Pakistan’s JF-17 Thunder or J-10C jets are priced between $20 and $25 million per unit.

“BrahMos, for instance, the Indian ballistic missile, costs $3 million apiece. If, for example, 10 units are used in a day, that amounts to $30 million in a single day,” he said.

Dr. Ali Salman, Executive Director of the Policy Research Institute of Market Economy (PRIME), an Islamabad-based independent economic policy think tank, said the conflict had disrupted economic sentiment and affected investor confidence.

“Certainly, investors would not like to come into countries, whether India or Pakistan, if they are in a constant war-like situation,” he told Arab News.

He emphasized that prolonged conflict would push people in both countries deeper into poverty, noting that one in four poor people in the world lives in India or Pakistan.

“We have 27 percent of the world’s poor in just these two countries, and I believe that we need to come out of the military context and go into an economic context,” he added.

Another economist, Shakeel Ramay, said every war has an economic dimension and that the conflict had imposed a heavy financial burden on both economies.

“Pakistan’s military expenditure over the four-day conflict, including jets, artillery and missiles, amounted to around $1.5 billion from the national budget, by my estimate,” he said, adding that this was significant, especially as the country continues to face economic challenges.

“The good thing is our economic activities continued without interruption, retail markets operated smoothly with no shortages and trade routes remained open, all indicating that the direct economic cost was minimal,” he added.


Pakistan Stock Exchange surges over 1,000 points amid ceasefire optimism

Updated 13 May 2025
Follow

Pakistan Stock Exchange surges over 1,000 points amid ceasefire optimism

  • The KSE-100 index gained 1278.15 points or 1.09 percent and closed at 118,575.88
  • Stocks rallied after President Trump announced ceasefire between nuclear-armed neighbors

ISLAMABAD: The Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) gained over 1,000 points on Tuesday, driven by investor optimism over ceasefire talks between Pakistan and India boosting regional stability, analysts said.
The KSE-100 index gained 2,769 points to reach 120,067.12 during intraday trading before settling at 118,575.88, up by 1,278.15 points or 1.09 percent from the previous close of 117,297.73.
Pakistan’s stocks had rallied after US President Donald Trump on Saturday announced a ceasefire between nuclear-armed neighbors Pakistan and India.
Both states had exchanged missile, drone and artillery strikes last week amid surging tensions.
“Stocks closed higher as investors weigh Pak-India ceasefire talks fostering stability and the foreign minister’s assurance on thin fiscal impact of conflict,” Ahsan Mehanti, the Chief Executive Officer of Arif Habib Commodities, told Arab News.
Pakistan Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb had also told Reuters in an interview on Monday that the conflict would not have a large fiscal impact on Pakistan. He described the standoff as a “short duration escalation” with minimal fiscal impact, saying it can be “accommodated within the fiscal space which is available to the government of Pakistan.”
Mehanti added that rupee stability, upbeat global equities, and a surge in global crude oil prices also played a catalytic role in the bullish close at the PSX.
Head of Intermarket Securities Raza Jafri highlighted that the KSE-100 was holding its levels following yesterday’s massive rise.
On May 12, Pakistani stocks rose more than nine percent, the highest single-day gain in decades, according to analysts, following a ceasefire with India and the approval of a $1 billion tranche by the International Monetary Fund (IMF), which Pakistan is expected to receive today as part of a larger $7 billion bailout agreement.
“The energy sector continues its rebound — on hopes of circular debt clearance — while news reports of a possible construction package (low-income housing units and mortgage financing) saw the Cement sector rally,” Jafri added.


Pakistan says won’t let India stop its water, hopes Trump will help resolve Kashmir issue

Updated 13 May 2025
Follow

Pakistan says won’t let India stop its water, hopes Trump will help resolve Kashmir issue

  • Nuclear-armed Pakistan and India have a history of bitter relations, with disputed Kashmir being a flashpoint between the two for decades
  • India suspended key water treaty with Pakistan amid tensions over an attack in Kashmir that escalated into a military conflict last week

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s Information Minister Ataullah Tarar has said that Islamabad will not let India stop its share of water under the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) and expressed hope that US President Donald Trump will resolve the Kashmir issue between the neighbors, following a ceasefire between them after last week’s military conflict.

India and Pakistan last week attacked each other with fighter jets, missiles and artillery fire, in worst fighting between them in more than two decades that has killed more than 70 people on both sides.

The fighting, which came to an end on Saturday after the US brokered a ceasefire, had erupted amid heightened tensions between the neighbors over an attack in Indian-administered Kashmir on April 22 that India blamed on Pakistan. Islamabad denies involvement.

In an interview with Britain’s Sky News channel, Tarar said since things were moving forward after the ceasefire between the two nations, Pakistan was looking forward to the resolution of its concerns, including India’s suspension of the IWT.
“India has not stopped the water yet and they don’t have the capacity to stop that water,” he said on Monday. “We obviously won’t let India deny the right of water to our people.”

India announced suspending the 1960 World Bank-brokered treaty, which ensures water for 80 percent of Pakistani farms, a day after the April 22 attack in Pahalgam that killed 26 tourists.

The IWT grants Pakistan rights to the western rivers — Indus, Jhelum, and Chenab — for irrigation, drinking, and non-consumptive uses like hydropower, while India controls the eastern rivers — Ravi, Beas, and Sutlej — for unrestricted use but must not significantly alter their flow. India can use the western rivers for limited purposes such as power generation and irrigation, without storing or diverting large volumes, according to the agreement.

Last week, India’s Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri said the treaty would remain in abeyance, signaling deeper diplomatic rifts between the two nations as they traded fire across several cities.

“The fact is that there have been fundamental changes in the circumstances in which the Indus Waters Treaty was concluded,” Indian Foreign Secretary Misri was quoted as saying by NDTV on Thursday.

He said there is now a need to “reassess the obligations under that treaty.”

But Tarar believed Pakistan’s case on the agreement was “very strong,” adding they would wait to see how things unfold.

“At this point in time, the water is flowing normally and there is no stoppage,” he told Sky News.

Pakistan and India have a history of bitter relations and frequently accuse each other of fomenting militancy in the other’s territory.

Kashmir, which has been divided between Pakistan and India since their independence from Britain in 1947, has been a flashpoint for decades, with the neighbors having fought two of their three wars over the region. Last week’s military conflict also originated from tensions over an assault in the disputed region.

Asked about details of the ceasefire, Tarar said many countries had been speaking to both Pakistan and India, and President Trump had been “pivotal” in securing the truce.

He hoped the US president would also help bring together the two nuclear-armed neighbors to resolve the enduring conflict in Kashmir.

Trump “has made things abundantly clear because he wants a resolution to major issues between us, between India and Pakistan,” Tarar said.

“And he has specifically mentioned Kashmir that he would like to settle.”

On Sunday, Trump said he would try to work with both India and Pakistan to see if they can resolve their dispute over Kashmir.

“I will work with you both to see if, after a ‘thousand years,’ a solution can be arrived at concerning Kashmir,” Trump wrote on his social media platform, Truth Social, referring to India and Pakistan.

But India has for years insisted Kashmir is a bilateral issue and not allowed any third-party mediation.

In his first address to the nation since last week’s conflict, Prime Minister Narendra Modi made clear that militancy was the only issue he wanted to discuss with Pakistan.

“I will tell the global community also, if we talk to Pakistan, it will be about terrorism only,” Modi said on Monday.


No truce in India-Pakistan disinformation war

Updated 13 May 2025
Follow

No truce in India-Pakistan disinformation war

  • On social media, citizens on both sides are vying to control public perceptions by peddling disinformation
  • Now that ceasefire has been declared, analysts warn hate speech “will once again refocus on religious minorities”

NEW DELHI: India and Pakistan have announced a ceasefire after coming close to all-out conflict, but on social media citizens on both sides are vying to control public perceptions by peddling disinformation.
Platforms such as Facebook and X are still awash with misrepresented footage of the attacks that killed at least 60 people and sent thousands fleeing. AFP fact-checkers have debunked many of the clips, which actually show the Israeli-Palestinian conflict or the war in Ukraine.
Indian and Pakistani media outlets have also amplified misinformation, including false or unverifiable claims of military victories that experts say have exacerbated tensions and contributed to a flood of hate speech.
“It’s complicated to establish the military facts because, in addition to the reality of strikes that are difficult to ascertain, there’s a communication war going on,” said General Dominique Trinquand, an international relations analyst and former head of the French military mission to the United Nations.
Disinformation peaked when India launched deadly air strikes on Wednesday targeting “terrorist camps” in Pakistan, two weeks after a deadly attack on the Indian-administered side of disputed Kashmir.
New Delhi blames Islamabad for backing the April 22 attack near the tourist town of Pahalgam, which killed 26 people — almost all of them Hindu men. Pakistan denies the claim.
After the first round of Indian air strikes, the Pakistani military shared footage that had previously circulated in reports about a 2023 Israeli air strike in Gaza. The clip quickly appeared on television and social media but was later retracted by numerous media outlets, including AFP.
AI-generated imagery has also muddied the waters, including a video that purportedly shows a Pakistan Army general saying the country lost two of its aircraft. AFP fact-checkers found the clip was altered from a 2024 press conference.
“We have seen a new wave of AI-based content in both video and still images due to increased access to deepfake tools,” said Joyojeet Pal, an associate professor in the School of Information at the University of Michigan.
Both India and Pakistan have taken advantage of the information vacuum to raise alarm bells and promote their own claims and counter-claims.
Pakistan appears to have lifted a more than one-year-old ban on X the same day of the Indian strikes, according to an AFP analysis of data from the nonprofit Open Observatory of Network Interference.
“In a time of crisis, the government needed its people’s voice to be heard all around the world and not to be silenced anymore like it was before for domestic political purposes,” said Usama Khilji, a digital rights expert and activist in Pakistan.
The country’s National Cyber Emergency Response Team (NCERT) on May 8 issued an alert about “increased cyberattacks and misinformation via emails, social media, QR codes, and messaging apps.”
Both Pakistan’s Ministry of Economic Affairs and the Karachi Port Trust later said their X accounts had been hacked.
A post from the latter account said the port — one of South Asia’s busiest — was attacked by the Indian military. The page was later restored and the port authority said no attack had taken place.
India, meanwhile, has executed a sweeping crackdown targeting the social media accounts of Pakistani politicians, celebrities and media organizations.
The government ordered X to block more than 8,000 accounts and banned more than a dozen Pakistani YouTube channels for allegedly spreading “provocative” content, including news outlets.
Press Information Bureau (PIB) Fact Check, a government-run website, has also refuted more than 60 claims about the ongoing crisis, many having to do with supposed Pakistani military victories.
The avalanche of disinformation online has been accompanied by a spike in hate speech offline.
A report from the US-based India Hate Lab documented 64 in-person hate speech events between April 22 and May 2. Most were filmed and later shared on social media.
“There is a cyclical relationship between offline hate speech and the rise of harmful online content,” said Raqib Hameed Naik, executive director of the Center for the Study of Organized Hate.
He said the Pahalgam attack sparked in India a “significant surge in rallies where far-right leaders weaponized the tragedy to incite hate and violence against Muslim Indians and Kashmiris.”
Several clips online show people dressed in Hindu garb calling for economic boycotts of minority Muslims. Rallies in the northern Indian states of Himachal Pradesh and Uttarakhand have seen similar incendiary speeches.
Now that a ceasefire has been declared, Naik warned that hate speech “will once again refocus on religious minorities.”
“The war machine may have paused, but the hate machinery never stops. I worry it might return with a greater force.”


Pakistan says committed to ceasefire after Modi warns of more strikes 

Updated 13 May 2025
Follow

Pakistan says committed to ceasefire after Modi warns of more strikes 

  • Modi has said will hit “terror hideouts” in Pakistan in case of new attacks on India, won’t be deterred by “nuclear blackmail“
  • Foreign office says India’s portrayal of Pakistan as seeking a ceasefire in “despair and frustration is yet another blatant lie”

ISLAMABAD: Islamabad said on Tuesday it was committed to a recent ceasefire deal with New Delhi and taking necessary steps toward de-escalation, after Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi warned he would target “terrorist hideouts” across the border if there were fresh attacks on India.

Modi, who also said India would not be deterred by what he called Islamabad’s “nuclear blackmail,” was speaking two days after the nuclear-armed neighbors agreed to a ceasefire, reached after four days of intense exchanges of fire as the old enemies targeted each other’s military installations with missiles and drones, killing dozens of civilians.

The military confrontation began on Wednesday, when India said it launched strikes on nine “terrorist infrastructure” sites in Pakistan and Azad Kashmir, with Pakistan retaliating by downing five Indian fighter jets. The escalation was triggered by tensions over an attack on Hindu tourists by militants in Indian-administered Kashmir last month that New Delhi has said Pakistan was involved in. Islamabad has denied any links to the attack and called for a neutral investigation.

In a statement released by the foreign office, Pakistan rejected the “provocative and inflammatory assertions” made by Modi, saying they signaled a “dangerous escalation rooted in misinformation, political opportunism, and a blatant disregard for international law.”

“This statement also reflects a propensity to fabricate misleading narratives to justify aggression,” the foreign office said. 

“Pakistan remains committed to the recent ceasefire understanding and taking necessary steps toward de-escalation and regional stability.”

The FO said the ceasefire was achieved through the mediation of several friendly countries and the portrayal of Pakistan as seeking a ceasefire in “despair and frustration is yet another blatant lie.”

On Tuesday morning, the Pakistan army put out figures for deaths in the latest confrontation, saying 11 armed forces personnel and 41 civilians, including women and children, had been killed. 

“Indian actions set a dangerous precedent for aggression, dragging the entire region to the brink of disaster. This reflects the mindset of a revisionist actor that seeks to upend strategic stability in South Asia without regard for consequences,” the foreign office added.

“Moreover, India is justifying the cold-blooded murder of innocent civilians, mostly women and children, as well as its highly irresponsible brinkmanship as the new normal for the region.

“Make no mistake, we will closely monitor India’s actions and behavior in this regard in the coming days. We also urge the international community to do the same.” 
 
The statement ended by saying any future aggression would be met with “full resolve” and called on India to prioritize regional stability and the well-being of its citizens “over narrow, politically motivated jingoism.”

Bitter rivals India and Pakistan have fought two of their three wars over Kashmir, a region split between them, since gaining independence from British colonial rule in 1947. Both nations are nuclear-armed, raising global alarm every time an armed conflict breaks out between them.

“If there is a terrorist attack on India, a fitting reply will be given... on our terms,” Modi had said in Monday’s speech in Hindi in a televised address. “In the coming days, we will measure every step of Pakistan... what kind of attitude Pakistan will adopt.”

“India will strike precisely and decisively at the terrorist hideouts developing under the cover of nuclear blackmail,” he said, and listed New Delhi’s conditions for holding talks with Islamabad and lifting curbs imposed after the Kashmir attack.

“India’s position is clear: terror and talks cannot go together, terror and trade cannot go together and water and blood cannot flow together,” he said, referring to a water sharing pact between the two countries New Delhi unilaterally suspended after the April 22 militant attack. 

- With inputs from Reuters